I believe is completely apparent to any sentient being that there is a distinct bias by the tech companies and that it favors the democrat party and its' candidates and policies. The fact that a leftist bias exists is so easily identified that Ray Charles or Helen Keller could see it from a thousand yards on dark night.
To try to argue that there is not or that it is not being done at the behest of and for the benefit of the democrat party and its candidates is also absurd. The democrats have a long history of trading favorable legislation for money and/or help in the areas of expertise of whomever they are dealing with at the time. While this shady method of doing business is engaged in by many, it must be acknowledged that the democrats have this area of expertise honed to a fine edge, in fact so much so that the head of their party has been engaged in this vile business both as an independent operator, enriching his entire extended family who themselves are so involved that son Hunter has become the family bagman much as biden himself served that same purpose years ago when he was Obama's bagman. And so the wheel turns. However I digress.
Back to censorship and the internet. If one examines the media treatment of the fiasco of the Russian Dossier and the myriad instances of criminality associated with that and the peripheral events surrounding it which in terms of news presented a story with the potential to make Watergate look like a parking ticket given that the Clinton campaign and the DNC had their DNA all over it, including numerous lies to federal judges on many occasions as well as perjury, false statements, suppression of evidence and so on I think one would have to concur that the word censorship doesn't have the capacity to describe the related series of events that went into the conspiracy required to cover up and suppress that story.
Following on the heels of that we find Hunter's laptop, the suppression of which absolutely altered the outcome of the 2020 election, a fact which the democrats are now belatedly admitting to that at this late date and much more.
To put it succinctly what is at issue here is the democrats are and have been controlling the flow of information in this country for decades. Their monopoly had never been totally air-tight before and many wish to make it so now and are here willing to go in open court and defend such a free republic killing philosophy. They have no interest in a Fourth Estate when a Fifth Column is within their grasp. What they are after now is akin to what they done with election law. They want to take bad ideas and worse policy and make it legal and if they fail in that because too many can see what they are trying to do and recognize the fatal effect it could have on the country, their aim is then, and here we have the analog to their game regarding election law, they wish to make it easy to cheat and impossible to be caught, precisely because cheating is so easy.
One may wish to read that twice to gain the full impact but it is quite clever. It reminds one of their climate facts in the Glo-Bull warming grift. When they were unable to falsify certain data to make it appear as though the earth were warming at a rate they wished it were, rather than continuing to falsify the data they were accumulating currently, which was hard to do because they were being watched, they cleverly went back a number of years and lowered the temperture data from the the 1930s and earlier to make it appear as though it warmed more and faster than real numbers would support. This was the cheating that came to light in some e-mail exchanges between some folks at East Anglia University .
I only mention that to illustrate the nature of our enemy in this battle for the future of our country. They will do anything and they never sleep. They are like water to someone who lives on a boat, they are always looking to gain entrance in order to sink it. Again I digress.
In any event the democrats are trying to codify the way they cheat, they are trying to normalize interference in elections but only in those cases where they are guilty of doing it. (See current persecution/railroading of President Trump),If someone else, someone who disagrees in any fashion with their rigid dogma tries to do any of what they are doing it's an impeachable offense, there needs to be a special prosecutor even if he is the defendants uncle or a life long family friend. There is no decency and there are no standards, not in a two tiered justice system where parents at school board meeting find their names on secret FBI watch lists labeled as terrorists for asking a question about one aspect of that dogma I referred to.
People who demonstrate at the capitol, the so-called people's house are held as political prisoners with no rights for years, one is even shot dead, left to bleed to death because medical help was not allowed in by those who shot her and then tried to lie to the American people by falsy claiming the demonstrators killed five police. A neat trick as none of the "insurrectionists" were even armed, although those who burned two billion dollars worth of homes and businesses in poor democrat controlled cities over the year of 2020 were not even arrested because they were doing all that at the behest of the democrats.
Vice President Harris summed up the democrats feelings toward their rioters, looters, killers and actual insurrectionists best when she stated, "They are not going to stop until they get what they want. And I don't think they should..." Now if that is not a tacit stamp of approval and a bow to the two tiered, bifurcated justice system that is all that remains of what was once the envy of the legal world, nothing is.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Rich in New Mexico.
Partisan censorship on line
I believe is completely apparent to any sentient being that there is a distinct bias by the tech companies and that it favors the democrat party and its' candidates and policies. The fact that a leftist bias exists is so easily identified that Ray Charles or Helen Keller could see it from a thousand yards on dark night. To try to argue that there is not or that it is not being done at the behest of and for the benefit of the democrat party and its candidates is also absurd. The democrats have a long history of trading favorable legislation for money and/or help in the areas of expertise of whomever they are dealing with at the time. While this shady method of doing business is engaged in by many, it must be acknowledged that the democrats have this area of expertise honed to a fine edge, in fact so much so that the head of their party has been engaged in this vile business both as an independent operator, enriching his entire extended family who themselves are so involved that son Hunter has become the family bagman much as biden himself served that same purpose years ago when he was Obama's bagman. And so the wheel turns. However I digress. Back to censorship and the internet. If one examines the media treatment of the fiasco of the Russian Dossier and the myriad instances of criminality associated with that and the peripheral events surrounding it which in terms of news presented a story with the potential to make Watergate look like a parking ticket given that the Clinton campaign and the DNC had their DNA all over it, including numerous lies to federal judges on many occasions as well as perjury, false statements, suppression of evidence and so on I think one would have to concur that the word censorship doesn't have the capacity to describe the related series of events that went into the conspiracy required to cover up and suppress that story. Following on the heels of that we find Hunter's laptop, the suppression of which absolutely altered the outcome of the 2020 election, a fact which the democrats are now belatedly admitting to that at this late date and much more. To put it succinctly what is at issue here is the democrats are and have been controlling the flow of information in this country for decades. Their monopoly had never been totally air-tight before and many wish to make it so now and are here willing to go in open court and defend such a free republic killing philosophy. They have no interest in a Fourth Estate when a Fifth Column is within their grasp. What they are after now is akin to what they done with election law. They want to take bad ideas and worse policy and make it legal and if they fail in that because too many can see what they are trying to do and recognize the fatal effect it could have on the country, their aim is then, and here we have the analog to their game regarding election law, they wish to make it easy to cheat and impossible to be caught, precisely because cheating is so easy. One may wish to read that twice to gain the full impact but it is quite clever. It reminds one of their climate facts in the Glo-Bull warming grift. When they were unable to falsify certain data to make it appear as though the earth were warming at a rate they wished it were, rather than continuing to falsify the data they were accumulating currently, which was hard to do because they were being watched, they cleverly went back a number of years and lowered the temperture data from the the 1930s and earlier to make it appear as though it warmed more and faster than real numbers would support. This was the cheating that came to light in some e-mail exchanges between some folks at East Anglia University . I only mention that to illustrate the nature of our enemy in this battle for the future of our country. They will do anything and they never sleep. They are like water to someone who lives on a boat, they are always looking to gain entrance in order to sink it. Again I digress. In any event the democrats are trying to codify the way they cheat, they are trying to normalize interference in elections but only in those cases where they are guilty of doing it. (See current persecution/railroading of President Trump),If someone else, someone who disagrees in any fashion with their rigid dogma tries to do any of what they are doing it's an impeachable offense, there needs to be a special prosecutor even if he is the defendants uncle or a life long family friend. There is no decency and there are no standards, not in a two tiered justice system where parents at school board meeting find their names on secret FBI watch lists labeled as terrorists for asking a question about one aspect of that dogma I referred to. People who demonstrate at the capitol, the so-called people's house are held as political prisoners with no rights for years, one is even shot dead, left to bleed to death because medical help was not allowed in by those who shot her and then tried to lie to the American people by falsy claiming the demonstrators killed five police. A neat trick as none of the "insurrectionists" were even armed, although those who burned two billion dollars worth of homes and businesses in poor democrat controlled cities over the year of 2020 were not even arrested because they were doing all that at the behest of the democrats. Vice President Harris summed up the democrats feelings toward their rioters, looters, killers and actual insurrectionists best when she stated, "They are not going to stop until they get what they want. And I don't think they should..." Now if that is not a tacit stamp of approval and a bow to the two tiered, bifurcated justice system that is all that remains of what was once the envy of the legal world, nothing is.