I really do not understand what is that you think there must be content moderation for.
You write snarky articles like this which are little more than "see, I told ya so" screeds.
Because after all, doncha know, you just have to censor free speech on the internet. Silly rabbit, free speech is for naive dolts.
Look at you. Content moderation is never ever ever good. Wake up.
Someone who works for a media site partly or fully financed by Russia or any other country is not automatically a liar, an automaton, or a propagandist. Was Larry King a Russian agent?
Maddow claimed that the OAN person was. That was a smear. That was pure defamation.
Meaning that claiming someone is a Russian agent simply because they did reporting for Sputnik is defamation. Meaning it's not bullshit.
Instead of celebrating corruption in the judiciary, why not support justice. Because you know.....they coming for you one day.
You'll look as stupid then as you look now. Crack down on defamation and smears.
We can only hope there is a growing backlash to Tech Dirt stupidity on this subject and several others.
When will you sincerely get woke? On the 12th of Never?
Is seeing a corrupt dirtbag cheating company fall into the trap set for them, while some imbecile at Tech Dirt cheers them on.
Think Afghanistan, buddy. They lied to you then. They are lying to you now. There is so much evidence of machine fraud. So much. You best start cooking that crow now. You're going to need a murder of crows to supply the necessary righting of your nearly terminal cognitive dissonance.....
How could Dominion be honest if Democrats send 700 lawyers to prevent discovery? 700. Think about it before your head explodes. Not long now.
Wakey wakey.
An article on Tech Dirt topic!! I appreciate it!
I love hearing news about the corrupt company suing more people and organizations. It is so great to see this SLAPP suit proceed when we all know that Dominion cannot withstand discovery.
Message to Dominion: Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.
Message to TechDirt: Try to stop cheerleading for a corrupt and evil company?
Just try, ok?
Try.
Facebook Is NOT The Internet; Stop Regulating As If It Was
Changed to:
Facebook IS The Internet For BILLIONS Of People; Start Regulating As If It Was
At no point in Trump's Presidency was the DOJ "his."
Trch Dirt has sunk to new lows.
Now, the anti-Free Speech writers at Tech Dirt are claiming their good buddy (/sarc) the Wall Street Journal is the authority on Free Speech issues, especially in regard to the now-openly-fascist social media corps.
Wow. Please do tell.....what else is the WSJ--your newest BFF--right about. Surely all of their policy stances you will now need to embrace like your lost twin brother separated in the Cave of the Clan Bear by the wolves who raised you.
Certainly the God-given right to free speech give to all humans did not reach your species yet. I hear that old copies of the WSJ burn well when there's nothing else to keep warm by.
Good luck!
So a site the pledges Free Speech is now filled with those who are exercising free speech?
Wow that is such a news scoop you found! People permitted to speak their mind, do speak their mind!!! Amazing!
So we are now back to an era of Free Speech again? What are you writing about? You are pro-totalitarianism?
Qualified immunity is NOT a protection against "bad" cops.
It IS a protection against frivolous law suits that any cop would be forced to spend 1000's of dollars to defend against.
Try to understand.
Say that anything you write about anything would be subject to immediate and numerous law suits, each one you would have to defend using attorneys paid on your own dime.
That would curtail your writing and reporting. The same happens to law enforcement.
Thinking or writing that it is any thing else than the destruction of an occupation? That's madness on your part.
You witnessed the results of your refusal to back Free Speech in social media backfire on you. 230 needs to be dismantled. Who cares how messy it will get? It could not be any worse than what we have now.
There used to be a bumper sticker, it was an answer to the common bumper stickers of America, love it or leave it. The alternative was: America, change it or lose it.
They had the opportunity to preserve freedom and fair play while under 230 protection. They didn't, cheered on by writers such as yourself.
Bye bye to 230, sooner or later. Bring the mess.
Finally! Some court somewhere has done something with the school marm fascists at Facebook!
Will the birth nation of Free Speech follow?
Yes, Disentangling Disinformation is not as easy as it looks!!! Since there is no sucha thing as disinformation, then disentangling it is hard! In fact, it is impossible.
Any other made up terms you are having trouble disentangling? How about hate speech another imaginary term (see Supreme Court, then see First Amendment).
Hope this helps!
Headline should read:
Citizen with Different Beliefs than Medical Establishment Sues Fascistic Twitter After It Bans Her Account For Spreading Free Speech
There. Fixed it for ya.
Why would you want to delete an opposite point of view? Especially in lite of all of the facts coming out revealing the dangerous effects for some of the vaccinations?
Always in previous times if even 20 people died after being vaccinated that was sufficient to halt vaccinations. So now, it's in the thousands and you write that we need to censor that news?
For why?
Could you start making sense? And making it soon?
So let me see if I can get this straight:
Enforcing the First Amendment on totalitarian tech monopolies is actually spitting on the First Amendment?
Clown World, Tech Dirt.
Clown World.
Never ceases to amaze me how, it it's conservative expression, Tech Dirt is all-in for censorship. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so short-sighted and mean-spirited.
Now Tech Dirt takes it to another level with Boomer Bashing.
But take heart. There's still a lot of room for putting down every other group who has a different point of view than the standard Williamsburg aging Gen-X'er.
I'm sure when the censors start censoring you it will be a surprise, but I've been surprised for a few years now that Tech Dijrt can't stick to copyright and patent nonsense, broadband monopolies, and a few other topics that they know something about. It's a surprise, the mission creep.
Oh well. Decay and fall.
House Republican's Entire 'Big Tech' Platform Is 'We Must Force Big Tech To Display Our Conspiracy Theories And Lies'
Correction: House Republican's Entire Big Tech [No need to put the truth in quotes] Is 'We Must Force Big Tech to Honor The First Amendment'
There. Fixed it for ya.
Remember: a 'conspiracy theory' is just a theory that a country with Free Speech honors by allowing. Countless conspiracy theories have been proven true. Remember: Who judges what is a lie? Is it the Court of Public Opinion via Free Expression? Or is it some writer at Tech Dirt?
Who would anyone with even half a brain choose? I'll take Freedom of Expression & Speech over some prejudiced writer at Tech Dirt every single minute of every single day.
And so would, anyone who believes in the First Amendment as it applies throughout the entire American society. No more nitpicking.
Glee
It never fails to astound me at your sadistic glee in chronicling the latest ruling from the corrupt District Courts, but only if it's against voters and vote fraud.
Your rousing embrace of the corrupt court's assertion that 150 million voters have no interest in honest, fraud-free elections, and thus have no "standing" and cannot be represented in a suit is similarly comical.
As usual I am mystified by your promiscuous of the Antifa word "grifter." In this case you seem to think that lawyers who raised money for their case spent it instead of on expert witnesses (or other legal costs) but really must have spent it on hookers and blow in Aruga.
Of course, neither you nor the court knows what it was spent on and therefore it is obviously not a grift and attorneys are not grifters but for unknown reasons you guys seem to think that the term is a damning indictment that proves in your mind, everything whatever that is.
Your article also claimed that Powell and Wood were sanctioned but your lead back to your own articles claiming that they might be. It's remarkable to watch all of the back-flips you do especially on the reputations of these esteemed Esq's.
Obviously there's no shame in your persona. You'll write anything if Trump has anything to do with it. Anything.