The difference might be that background music has a different rate than music used in a performance.
So, background music is one rate. And music that the girls dance to is a different rate.
Based on my understanding of the Subscription Numbers; Netflix will have one million less subscribers than they anticipated.
Instead of 49 million; they have 48 million.
Doesn't that constitute a 2% drop, give or take? Why does 2% equate to a massive customer exodus?
As a point of clarification here are instructions on how to prevent Flash Cookies from being set:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/526/52697ee8.html
With 7-11 eleven is it because the promise of Free Slurpees gets people into the store only to discover they are out of the "Free Slurpie" cups?
It actually turned me off from buying a Slurpie or going back to 7-11.
You're trusting your backups to USB Drives? I hope you mean Hard Drives, and not those sticks..
I Don't know anything about the band, but I was also wondering if it was a tongue and cheek style move.
Is it creepy? Most definitely.
Is it an invasion of Privacy? I think so. When I walk into a store, such as an Apple Store (or a Best Buy or any store w/ computers available) I think I have a reasonable expectation that the computer will not take a picture of me for future public display.
Is it an illegal invasion of privacy? I suspect not. At best he is violating some unspoken etiquette w/ regards to what you're allowed to do on public computers.
Here are some tools that convert HTML/JavaScript into Native iOS apps:
http://www.nimblekit.com/index.php
http://www.phonegap.com/
If you Google, there is a lot of info out there:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Can+I+build+native+iOS+Apps+with+HTML&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
It sounds like these work because someone wrote a a "convertor" of HTML/JavaScript to iOS byte code--similar to what Adobe did for Flash/AIR w/ their iOS Exporter.
That said, I agree the business model sucked. The company may not be shutting down if they also had a web version of their software, and a Mac version, and a Windows version, and an Android version, and a Windows Phone 7 version, etc...
I'm a bit surprised the decision was to shut down instead of convert their work to a different platform.
Of course, I'm constantly surprised these days how many people tie their business to a single source. I never consider it a good business model.
@Chronno You're probably right regarding home use. But I find it hard to believe a small business will have trouble affording $500 a year for software that is important to keeping them in business.
I think you misunderstood the issue. Adobe software will always open "down versions". The issue is that once it is saved in the new version; it can't be opened in the old version.
So, If you send me a Photoshop CS4 file; and I save it in Photoshop CS5; you can no longer open that file.
That said; many times I have been given the option to maximize version compatibility when saving. And a PhotoShop file I just saved and created in CS5 opened without problems in CS3.
Many [in the Adobe Community] feel that Adobe's new Subscription model pricing will help solve issues like this:
http://www.adobe.com/products/creativesuite/cssubscription.html
Instead of paying a single "high price" you'll pay a much lower monthly fee and always have the most up to date software.
Such a Subscription model seems to coincide with a lot of the values touted here; as they are selling their ability to continue to update their products.
I have no idea how this will play out long term, though.
Minor correction.
Their Flash Builder software is based on Eclipse. Flash Builder is an IDE for building Flex and ActionScript applications.
The Flex SDK is not built off Eclipse; nor tied to it in any way.
I think I just figured out a way to make money in the newspaper Industry.
I've noticed a bunch of the TV Series that I watch on Netflix are missing episodes, with them marked as "DVD Only". I have no idea if this is a short term glitch or an actual new approach. But, it is pretty frustrating.
I wonder if unfair competition could be used against patent trolls? Or would they argue that they aren't competing as they have no product or service available in the marketplace?
I am more prone to be scared of folks going to church than those playing D&D.
Those are cool stats.
I have some curiosity about the financial info and profitability of the site. ( How much did you make; where does it come from; what was the profit; etc.. ). It'd be very cluetrain manifesto-ish for ya'll to share that info.
As others have said or alluded to...
Isn't Trademark law supposed to be regional? That is why there can be a Joe's Diner in Boston, Connecticut, and New York all being completely separate businesses.
If Groupon has no presence in Australia, it seems the other company is acting legitimately [as best I understand the law].
Everytime you post a story like this I'm reminded of this story:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/25/earlyshow/main6331796.shtml
Although I can't find an update that positively links FB to the theft.
Nook..
I got to speak to a bunch of the marketing / evangelist folks behind the Nook at Adobe's Max conference last week. I believe Barnes and Noble seems to have an approach of using the digital stuff (Nook / Purchase) in order to extend their in-store experience.
As one example, if you have a Nook inside a Barnes and Noble store; then you can read any digital book available. As you leave the store the books are reverted to trial mode. [I assume the Nook has to be connected to the local B&N's wifi]
It seems a natural extension of that to stock their shelves w/ products that help augment this digital content strategy.