Actually the problem exists in all companies. At root the point is that capitalists don't actually like capitalism. All companies try to create monopolies for themselves. The ones who are able to use copyright to do this have an extra advantage and so are more successful.
Sorry - should read "as Walter Wolfgang found out in 2005"
Sadly I have to disagree with you there. You are wrong but the reality is even worse. In fact the UK did a lot of these bad things before the US. We are the testing ground.
Also bear in mind that the things you have to do to be considered a "terrorist" are extremely easy - as found out in 2005.
Since the days of Henry Stimson who said:
"Gentlemen do not read each others mail"
Why not use George Orwell's definition of journalism
"Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations."
Of course it seems that Durbin's defintion is the exact opposite.
(with thanks to That One Guy) for bringing this quote to my attention last week.)
Plus the $400 fee seems to be for the pre-production device - not just for the license.
Especially if he is a subcontractor and not even a regular employee.
OCLC owns all copyright rights in the Dewey Decimal Classification, and licenses the system for a variety of uses.
That does not prove that there actually are any such rights!
The worst of it is that he didn't even go down making a principled stand - so he is not even a
decent quality martyr.
A government that doesn't care about due process might well treat Trump the same way that the Russians have treated
Khodorkovsky
Nominative determinism Michael Moroney
Not that far.
After all you started the war in question for dubious (and somewhat unclear) motives at a time when the Britian was trying to deal with the threat of Napoleon. You invaded a peaceful country (Canada) and part of your motivation was to try and dispossess the Indians (who were being supported by Britain).
The episode of the burning of Washington was symptomatic of incompetence. Only a fool starts a war from such a weak position.
As for "without infringing a political, civil or religious right" I doubt if many native Americans or Canadians would agree with that.
I'm not sure if this means that no one wants to circumvent DRM to do something legal, or that no one cares about circumvention of DRM being illegal.
Actually I suspect the truth is that no one cares enough either way to bother to go through the hoops necessary to use this procedure.
n typical UK fashion, they have basically done similar to the US.
Actually the UK have not copied the US in that. They actually started the whole anti-circumvention thing some years before the DMCA and the EU directives.
However there is a cimbersome workaround as follows.
Permitted acts
Whilst it may be legitimate for right holders to use these tools to prevent copyright infringement, they can also prevent permitted activities that fall under copyright exceptions.
The exceptions for use of DRM protected works are narrow, but if you consider your use falls under one of the exceptions you may request a workaround to the protection measure from the right holder.
Under UK copyright law, if the right holder does not provide an effective workaround, you may issue a ?notice of complaint? to the Secretary of State. If your complaint is upheld the Secretary of State may issue directions on how to ensure that you are able to make use of the work in the way permitted by law.
Of course - whilst trading real freedom for spurious safety at home they were happy to give up safety for the citizens of Iraq in the cause of a "liberty" that has yet to be achieved. The same is true to a greater or lesser extent in many other countries of the world.
The reality is that this is actually driven by the need politicians feel to be seen to be doing something.
At home they achieve it by sacrificing freedom in the cause of marginal improvements in safety.
Overseas the need to be seen to be acting decisively takes the forms of military expeditions that cost many lives in the hope of achieving "liberty" which never really seems to be realised.
What we need is a government that is biased towards inaction!
And to think that authors used to complain that pirates didn't care about the integrity of the text:
Here is Martin Luther:
Now, the damage might still be
sufferable, / were it not for the fact that they
handle my books so wrongly and infamously. For
what they do is to print these in such a hurry /
that when they come back to me, / I cannot
recognise my own books! / Here something has been
omitted, / there something is displaced, / there
again the wrong word is printed, / and everywhere
one sees a lack of revision.
Now it will be the offical version that has the errors!
Given sufficient resources and time (the more resources, the less time) you can break any code.
Provably incorrect. The one time pad is theoretically unbreakable, although practically unusable for most ordinary purposes. Having said that, if you were planning a terrorist attack...
Not long.
The infamous Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) in the UK was brought in under the excuse of "terrorism" was soon used by local authorities for all kinds of trivial matters
http://requestinitiative.org/2012/08/local-councils-misusing-ripa-law-to-spy-on-citizens/
and eventually to spy on their own councillors
http://raedwald.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/council-ripa-misuse-to-cost-millions.html
Re:
I was under the impression Jesse Owens did a marvelous job showing Hitler's ideology up in 1936.
An impression which was sadly false.
In fact Hitler did not treat Owens any worse than any other non-German athlete.
Owens said "Hitler had a certain time to come to the stadium and a certain time to leave." "It happened he had to leave before the victory ceremony after the 100 meters. But before he left I was on my way to a broadcast and passed near his box. He waved at me and I waved back. I think it was bad taste to criticize the 'man of the hour' in another country."[13]"
The people who mistreated him were Americans.
He never received any acknowledgement from FDR and he had to ride the freight elevator to get to the reception for Olympic athletes at the Waldorf Astoria after the games.
In Germany he was allowed to stay in the same hotels as white athletes - not so in the US at the time...
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Owens