Exactly. They're all for open internet in Iran or China, but in the US... how many websites has the DHS shut down now?
Don't worry, the plans are to extend these scanners well beyond airports. The scared, braying fools who like the idea of these scanners yet have never encountered them will, soon enough.
Please don't linke to infowars and call it facts.
Actual facts.
Why do I suspect that will fall under the banner of 'national security'?
Obama is wrong about "everything"? I think a better example would be George W. Bush... a graduate from both Yale and Harvard Business School yet still not the brightest tool in the shed.
But you're spot on about the Ivy League attitude.
Michael Chertoff? Again?
This guy has his greasy fingerprints all over government programs.
Better add Google to the list too.
Hell, why not just sue "the internet"?
But in all fairness, he had a little help.
Just wondering... when was the last piece of legislation passed which increased civil liberties and freedoms?
Now, it could just be that all the coverage goes to rights restrictions (especially in my particular blend of information sources), and there's a heap of good legislation being passed in the background, but I don't think that's the case.
"The biggest problem is that the government is assuming that the terrorists are idiots and are going to use the same tactic again."
The biggest problem is that the government is using terrorism as a means to their own ends. As has already been mentioned, the 'underwear bomber' seems to have been set up in order to push through these invasive new 'security' measures.
"People forget the terrorist idea is to make us feel unsafe and destabilize society to make way for their revolution. Unless you understand the objective of their tactics, you'll never understand their tactics at all."
That statement seems more applicable to the government at the moment.
Yeah, the judiciary is well known for making impartial decisions based solely on reason, not politics.
Exactly. If that was contracted work to Disney, then Disney can do what they like with it.
As much as Pogo may be proud of their work, it's not their call.
At least they're expecting the law suit.
It's difficult to understand why the US government -- and Homeland Security specifically -- is helping protect a single industry's obsolete business model
Control of the media is vital in a police state. This is why some of the more oppressive three letter agencies are interested in protecting it.
Physical muscle is vital to enforce unfair laws. This is why the industry is so keen to involve the state law enforcement apparatus.
As an illustration of the cozy arrangement the media and the government have in the "land of the free", compare the difference in coverage of the Wikileaks Iraq war docs leak between the New York Times and the rest of the world.
"[...] the loss of life could happen due to a DDoS".
Your lack of hyperbole is a credit to your credibility, good sir.
What do you expect from the Murdoch media?
Formal recognition of (and a substantive apology for) the hatchet job they did (and continue to do) to objective journalism?
If it comes from that network and it's not partisan, it's fluff.
Not a fan of Billy Madison?
Mike, I'm interested to know what questions you have about which aspects of CC licenses?
I was always under the opinion that if those are the terms a content creator wanted to license their content under, then fair enough. End of story.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Exactly!
I'd be happy to.
The plane in question is a DC-10. Reference photos [1][2] clearly show what the video describes as "nozzles" are actually flap track fairings.
Here is some information on the design and purpose of flap track fairings.
Here's a video of a perfectly innocuous Airbus A380 contrail, also shot from the cockpit of another plane. Note the similarities.