Activation hacking is still above most consumer's ability. MS Windows went from maybe 75% compliance to 90%+ compliance by requiring activation.
Epic can use records of use from before the cheats became available and the use after. That may even be compared to other properties that don't have known cheats.
That wouldn't be a question as much as what is Epic's losses from a free game.
One simple answer. Yes.
If you agree to it then they may force and enforce any silly, incomprehensible, unequal, or whatever punishment on the end user. Remember, you did agree to it.
If you get into a poker game, you agree to the rules. If the random cards end up against you then tough sheet, you lose. You agreed to the end user agreement in order to join the game.
If he is a minor, then the parents become responsible and should be named.
The suit should hinge on Epic's claim of damages. I think their showing that cheats cost them money will be an uphill fight. Without showing a loss on a free game then they have no claim.
Is the term "Fashion Cop" copyrighted?
Asking for a friend.
FIFTH AMENDMENT
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Read again, "..., nor be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, ..." By forcing him to open the phone, or a safe, or decipher a code; they are compelling him to be a witness against himself.
Ars Technica is a California based company. I suspect they will ask a California Court to hear it as they have no presence in Illinois.
And as if MicroSoft didn't have enough bad publicity about Windows 10. Suing reporters that report their problems won't get them many brownie points.
With the early MicroSoft versions of Windows, most of the people I know were sharing passwords and/or using illegal versions. Once they had killed off OS2, made Apple a shadow of it's former self, and had well over 90% market did they get serious and put controls on Windows XP.
Just saying I know a guy that had a copy.
This has zero to do with Snowden and everything to do with cops that don't have reasonable oversight.
From the sounds of the report, this was manslaughter and that doesn't have a statute of limitations.
No. His parole officer may do these things with or without the assistance of police. Police may not do these things on their own though. A person does not lose their rights just because they have been jailed or are on parole or probation.
Turning the camera off is most likely a direct obstruction of justice.
I would assume that if a court finds them personally guilty they could be banned from holding office. I don't know Florida law, but most States do allow that when a politician has been found guilty of corrupt practices.
Troll harder moron. Clinton turned over her emails when asked.
The Sheriff yes, the union, no. The employer is responsible for the conduct of its employees. While the employer may always fire an employee, as government employees, it is a lot harder to fire police. The union doesn't hire the cops so they aren't responsible for them.
I don't disagree with you, but the attitude is the police are allowed a more lenient performance than ordinary employees simply because of their job.
Not to mention Fonzi Bear and Spongebob Squarepants.
Like the arrest of Micheal Flynn, its a start.
Similar situations have happened in the US with both public and private labs. One well known case involved over 20,000 cases from a State Police lab in Boston.
The worse though are the "Field Kits" that allow cops to check suspected drugs in the field. These kits end up with a very high rate of false positives yet the courts allow they give reasonable cause.
A couple of breweries sell beer with moose heads on the bottle. Having the poor fortune of tasting what I can only describe as moose urine, ya, I can see this being a micro-brewery.
Re:
The shapes are similar, with slight modifications. I can see someone being confused by the two. However, since Apple doesn't trade in pharmaceuticals then that similarity is minimized.