Where I am from, that would be in t'day (pronounced int day) not int he day!
I remember when 1984 was a work of fiction, and not a instruction manual!
If it is all voluntary then it is doomed from the start.. What mugger / rapist / vandal (and dare I say terrorist / paedophile) would volunteer to be tracked 24/7 and commit a crime whilst carrying all the stuff that tracks them?
Nope. Flexible implies that it will return to its original shape.
It is more MALLEABLE!
The problem with these tests is that they are misleading.
In the Consumer Reports test, they apply pressure evenly across the middle of the back of the device - not stressing the weakest area of the device, but most likely putting stress on the battery and the stronger side structures. Numerous videos have shown that the phone is much more easily bent if applying pressure to a localised area on the back of the device near the volume buttons.
How that affects the way the phone reacts in a pocket is still unclear - however I would think in a pocket the phone could be subject to uneven pressure and twisting which could have an effect.
Also unclear is how the phones react to repeated bending under much smaller pressure - since the iPhone does not have any springiness, over a period of months a much smaller pressure could lead to the same effect and result in a bent phone.
Over in Germany, the delivery service DHL has been granted permission to use fully autonomous drones to deliver parcels to an island over 7 miles away from its starting point.
Speaking of the limit, can Torrentfreak file the same request, with the additional clause that once the work required hits the 18 hour mark, whatever's gathered so far at that point is sent over? Seems like that would be at least a passable workaround to the strict time limit imposed.
Why the hell can't we just have small, cheap personal quadcopters - much like the cheap drones you can buy? eg.. a full size one of these: http://www.brentfordrc.com/281-thickbox_default/ares-ethos-qx130-ultra-micro-rtf-quad.jpg
You have a fair point, and my view is most likely obscured by the media - however my impression of say the early 1900's (aside from the wars) are not ones of teenagers threateninbg OAPs on street corners or breaking in and murdering them and robbing them so they could score some smack. These days, it seems almost daily!
This may simply be a result of 'rose tinted specs' from the media and the OAPs I interact with daily!
Agreed - I cannot cite evidence and this is just a viewpoint. However this is a strong impression I have and will accept it is is wrong if proven.
What is the percentage of violent crime today compared to say the 1910's? How many murders or violent beatings per 100K population per annum?
OK - many may disagree with my viewpoint, but here it is..
Violence, sexual assaults and the like appear to have been on the increase since at least the last century. Why this is I have no idea - however, media - be it games, comics, video - may well have played a part in it.
I don't see the fears as unfounded, although I also do not see these things as a direct causation of the problems we face.
Violent video games, comics. books, movies may have an effect on people who have already got tendencies towards unbefitting behaviour, but are unlikely to be the cause - however, as the standards of what is acceptable to view are relaxed the underlying behaviour is normalised.
As this process is gradual, such tendencies cannot be attributed directly to the behaviour of the individuals, however as a society these behaviours become more frequent until they are the norm.
I know I might attract people clicking the 'report' button, but I feel it is a discussion worth having - why do we see more delinquents and serious crime today than we did 50 years ago?
For some reason, this whole fiasco reminds me of this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218
... of visiting the toilet after my flat mate has been in there. I find it very stressful and emotionally disturbing (Not to mention nauseating, asphyxiating and horrifying). Does that mean I can torture him over it?
This is Internet 101. Posts don't come down because of errors. Errors are corrected and acknowledged, but posts aren't simply removed because someone with a financial interest in the subject matter at hand thinks mistakes should result in disappearances.
The problem as I see it with mixed content warnings is that as the average user can not tell which parts are secure and which are not, if they start seeing this warning on trusted sites they will learn to ignore the warning on any site. This ultimately leads to a less secure internet.
I never said the cert was invalid. I said "there is still a problem with SSL here on Techdirt"
On mine, the padlock symbol on the address bar has a warning symbol. Opera plain refuses to open the page unless I OK the warning.
You realise there is still a problem with the SSL here on Techdirt right?? According to Chrome there are still elements that are not secure! Opera throws an error about akamai technologies when I try to visit TD.
Can I still participate? I have a spare VM just waiting to make me money!
Is this the same Washington Post that thinks there is a difference between a 'Golden Key' and a backdoor?
According to an Apple statement published on Ars Technica: