So in the same way I’d argue we legalize drugs, why not have a careful, legal pathway to break into a phone?
Translation: "I'm a technology reporter, dammit. I know stuff. Just not about technology. Or drugs. Because no one's arguing for a careful, legal pathway to drugs except me. And you're reading me, damn you, so shut up."
Well, they have internet access in prison, so if he actually broke a concrete law involing, say, hacking or something of the sort he'd still have internet access. He still has net access at school, and you can't tell me the school staff are gonna want to be monitoring him, specificly. I'm not even touching the grounds for appeal that'd provide.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by quanin.
And the logic is...
Translation: "I'm a technology reporter, dammit. I know stuff. Just not about technology. Or drugs. Because no one's arguing for a careful, legal pathway to drugs except me. And you're reading me, damn you, so shut up."
Re:
That doesn't change when you become an adult, apparently.
Re: Sentence is irrelevant
Well, they have internet access in prison, so if he actually broke a concrete law involing, say, hacking or something of the sort he'd still have internet access. He still has net access at school, and you can't tell me the school staff are gonna want to be monitoring him, specificly. I'm not even touching the grounds for appeal that'd provide.