I don't even own a CD player any more. I don't even have a DVD drive on my computer either, built in 2010. I install all my games through Steam or other online distribution means. What would one do with a useless disc?
But does this even matter? Unless the anime industry is also in the rental industry, the anime companies have zero responsibility to care about the bottom line of rental shops. Pointing out the diminished sales of rental shops when it doesn't affect the bottom line of the anime industry in the slightest means nothing.
Yeah, I don't quite get it either.
It's not like Google really wasted a lot of time, money, and effort to catch Microsoft in the act, and once it did, it tossed up a blog post about it. Honestly to me, it seems like Google's doing exactly what Techdirt says it should, by socially shunning Microsoft for "cheating". Maybe it should've done it a little more snarky to come out quite a bit more ahead, but still, from what I've read, it's good enough.
I don't quite get why Mike says "Google complaining about Microsoft using clickstream data is a waste of time". It isn't. It puts Google in the better light socially, exactly what Mike has set forth in the past. It's been really hard to read these Google vs Bing articles in the past couple days, since it's a glaring hypocrisy in every one of the articles.
IANAL, but isn't digging up bodies illegal without an exhumation order?
From the article:
"The Chicago Police, he said, have been expanding their recordings of ordinary civilians, with blue-light cameras, cameras in patrol cars, and the like. The justification for these recordings is that what happens in public is public, and there should be no expectation of privacy."
If that's true, there's a massive double standard going on here. That just really pisses me off.
I find this to be very much true. I usually check Hulu or Netflix before any of the non-legitimate streaming sources. They could be showing me ads all day long and raking in revenue, but whenever I don't find it online, it's straight to torrents or don't even bother watching.
That's because you're identifying the wrong enemy.
The government has identified WikiLeaks as the enemy, when the real enemy is the public. The government has identified as conquering the internet as the way to engage in battle, when the real way to engage is to actually engage with the people with empathy.
Taking your hydra analogy, it's obvious that engaging in battle will only create more hydra heads. But what if you were to sidestep the whole situation by convincing the hydra to become your ally?
Well, even then, the entire question hints at corrupting democracy itself.
If you really look at the question hard enough, it boils down to:
"How much would you pay to elect your chosen representative by buying votes off?"
Majority of people probably would say zero to this.
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of whistleblowing is to not go to the people who are involved. You go to an outside party who has authority over those involved. Since the data involves pretty much everyone in government, the next best bet is to release it to the public who hopefully still has some power over the government.
Then again, everything that comes out of his mouth is pretty funny.
Wouldn't this overturn the third party doctrine though?
Isn't that what unsecured networks and computers are for?
I'm sorta hoping that these computers are in locked cabinets with limited access to the internals. Because once you have actual physical access to that, you basically can do anything with enough know how.
I'm not exactly knowledgeable on classified computers, but for the most part, they don't have any of those ports, and aren't connected to the internet. Honestly, sneaking the tools in to do any of that stuff should be the bottleneck that's checked.
Err, you do realize that this article basically tells you flat out that they're doing what you think they should be doing, right?
Most.
Operation Payback doesn't use botnets to achieve its attacks.
Wrong.
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/LOIC
That's the entire point of any protest. If everyone could just ignore the people protesting without a single bit of inconvenience, then there would literally be no point to the protest.
Keyword being independent. You mention large groups of people who have beef with WikiLeaks. That's exactly what I'm getting at. It's much less likely that the attack on WikiLeaks was some random group doing it for the lulz than a politically motivated attack, possibly government endorsed.
Re:
Actually Apple is only taking 30% royalty on the app itself (i.e. the royalty they take for bringing a user to the service.) After that, subscriptions go 100% to the service itself, and Apple takes nothing from it.