"the resulting ratio of 375 to one would still run afoul of the Due Process Clause."
Somebody needs to tell the MAFIAA that their $150,000 to 99¢ ratio is WAYYY off then.
I speak English, but I'm pretty sure I could tell the difference between Arabic and Hindi.
I love playing the Lego games, especially the movie adaptations.
"Real" gamers tell me that I shouldn't like them.
Hey, I like mindless G-rated violence and collecting little coiny studs, OK?
"This is why they'll publish lists of every person's name found in the Contacts list of a suspected prostitute's phone."
Um, I'm pretty sure if the Chief of Police or Mayor or any Federal official is on the list, they will NOT be included in the list.
How does a "cyber-security professional" have an AOL account?!?
If my 78-year-old computer illiterate dad didn't live at my house, I would have cut the cord years ago.
Already, my older daughter is at college and watches shows for free on sites like fox.com, cbs.com and cw.com.
My younger daughter watches anime and is likely to watch Netflix, Hulu or CrunchyRoll on her phone with headphones.
I can't see either one of them paying $100 a month for cable. Why would they?
Actually, even Windows 10 supports 16-bit applications, as long as you run the 32-bit version.
Is the person it is passed to an "Author"? If not, then yes, it does say that.
Happy Birthday to You
Happy Birthday to You
Happy Birthday dear Public Domain
Happy Birthday to You
Actually, they used the word "piracy" about sheet music, radio, all sorts of things.
Are they earlier than 1987? Then they are already in MY public domain.
California recently passed a controversial law that psychologists cannot counsel someone away from homosexuality.
I've been curious with how that law will line up with freedom of speech, especially since many people have very happily been counseled away from homosexuality in the past (for instance, Rosaria Butterfield).
A medical practitioner should be able to help people in whatever way they see fit without the intrusion of government. And people should be free to find the practitioner with a method that helps them.
When they complain and sue because the city is not allowed to do that, counter that you are serving those that Verizon refuses to serve.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Or is it only a bad thing when they do it for something you're NOT in favor of?
Like "marriage" for instance. All definitions up until 50 years ago included a man and a woman.
If they had no intention of fulfilling the basic stated obligations of the contract then it's a "bad faith" contract and a "material breach" and can be voided.
I lost a lot of respect for iFixit over this. They have shown that they cannot be trusted.
They should be writing letters to the FCC instead. Lately, that seems like the best way to get traction on this.
I think you have it confused. It was more like:
Cable companies: Here, you need to pay us for protection from now on!
Netflix: From who?
Cable companies: US!
FCC: Hey, you guys, knock it off! Or so help me I'll take you out back and tan your hide...
Re: 80%
You're right, I only pay $85/month. But I rarely watch anything on it (that I couldn't watch online easily), so I really should switch to cable.