Do you have anything else than that ? all you can do is name call? can you dispute anything I said? give it a try, it may require some brain power but just try
What will be passed and it will in some form be passed will not be enforced in the current form, all the ACs here can scream about the Supreme court, about trump now being King or whatever, that has nothing to do with this law, the Current Supreme court has shown more than once that it is good on 1st Amendment issues, you can hate roberts or Kanavaugh all you want it does not change the facts, but some of you have your talking points from the left and refuse to engage in an type of realistic conversation, so go rant away, it is what makes some here happy
And Sosta did not even make it the Supreme court, it was not thrown out but narrowed because it was to vague. There is zero chance this bill is enforced in its current form
It is hilarious how people just blame one side for things. Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barret. all GOP appointed Judges that are very good on 1st Amendment issues, even Alito concurred in striking down the video game law 13 years ago but hey don't let facts get in the way things
I doubt you will get 6 false notices in 12 months, if you do then you have bigger problems than some silly 6 strikes fear mongering scheme that means nothing
Yes there could be potential problems but the ISPs are really not too enthusiastic about this and they already are losing customers so i doubt they will be bending over backwards to help get rid of paying customers that are not cutting the cord by themselves, i pay for cable phone and internet, i would bet my life comcast won't be cutting me off if i download some movie
no this does not affect businesses and it has nothing to do with fair use and it really is not anything new, media companies have been alerting the ISPs about infringement for a long time but now it has the label 6 strikes which is intended to strike fear into ignorant fools which i see it already has
Ok the ISPs are not monitoring you, it is a 3rd party working for he media companies and they report the infringement to the ISP,and they send you a letter saying you have been bad, if you are really stupid enough to get caught 6 times then this internet thing may not be for you
Altio did not concur sorry
The only Justice that hates 230 is Thomas, even Alito did concur with his dissent Thomas wrote about 230
230 will be voted out? is there a senator named Section 230?, try putting a correct sentence together
Do you have anything else than that ? all you can do is name call? can you dispute anything I said? give it a try, it may require some brain power but just try
What will be passed and it will in some form be passed will not be enforced in the current form, all the ACs here can scream about the Supreme court, about trump now being King or whatever, that has nothing to do with this law, the Current Supreme court has shown more than once that it is good on 1st Amendment issues, you can hate roberts or Kanavaugh all you want it does not change the facts, but some of you have your talking points from the left and refuse to engage in an type of realistic conversation, so go rant away, it is what makes some here happy
That bill has not been used against anyone other than backpage, has not been used once, and it was narrowed by the courts not congress and then passed
And Sosta did not even make it the Supreme court, it was not thrown out but narrowed because it was to vague. There is zero chance this bill is enforced in its current form
What I said was a fact, which you obviously can't dispute so you just give some opinion which may or may not be true.
It is hilarious how people just blame one side for things. Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barret. all GOP appointed Judges that are very good on 1st Amendment issues, even Alito concurred in striking down the video game law 13 years ago but hey don't let facts get in the way things
The Florida GOP does not get to appoint federal judges
Terrific but has no chance of passing
privacy both offline and online disappeared long ago
If ISSA is a supporter i am not concerned, i trust his judgmnt on these things.
This about intel sharing, jesus christ is it that difficult to be accurate or is the attempt to just scare people?
Re: Re: Re: Need confirmation
wallow seems to be the only person here who has a grasp on reality
Re: Re: Re: I don't normally do this....
what are you talking about
Re: Re:
I doubt you will get 6 false notices in 12 months, if you do then you have bigger problems than some silly 6 strikes fear mongering scheme that means nothing
Yes there could be potential problems but the ISPs are really not too enthusiastic about this and they already are losing customers so i doubt they will be bending over backwards to help get rid of paying customers that are not cutting the cord by themselves, i pay for cable phone and internet, i would bet my life comcast won't be cutting me off if i download some movie
Re:
no this does not affect businesses and it has nothing to do with fair use and it really is not anything new, media companies have been alerting the ISPs about infringement for a long time but now it has the label 6 strikes which is intended to strike fear into ignorant fools which i see it already has
Ok the ISPs are not monitoring you, it is a 3rd party working for he media companies and they report the infringement to the ISP,and they send you a letter saying you have been bad, if you are really stupid enough to get caught 6 times then this internet thing may not be for you