I was waiting for this and was satisfied within a minute. lol
Yes, it does happen like this, but not to the extent the FBI and repair employees are counting on. Personally, if it was not in the original work order, i would be asking the customer whether they wanted corrupt data recovery and a visual check to see how well that went. (Even for close friends for whom i can correctly assume they don't care and will respond in the affirmative.) Aside from that, would it not be an addition charge for the additional work?
You don't search visually through opened documents looking for an infection, and document corruption does not harm your system.
I have managed, for years, to manually fix what automated tools do not, and then fix the issues caused by the changes an infection caused (including "missing system files" which are neither missing, nor system files) without looking at anyone's personal shit.
I'd be happy to trawl everything on your drives for you next time you need a repair, if you like, but billing depends on how much i have to pointlessly snoop through for you.
I've actually wondered how ISDS determinations are enforceable at all, in the first place. What if the country says go stick it in your ear?
Good the higher court was anti-pre-post prior restraint in this ridiculous attempt to keep two news organizations from having information to report which was already in the public domain. What this unknown family was thinking, i don't even
Psst. There are no women on the internet. Also, women don't look at porn. Ever.
In the mentioned Act, also one is a directly paying customer, communicating one-to-one, and the railroads and telegraph are the first way to communicate coast to coast faster than months (or weeks during the short life of the Pony Express).
I would hazard a guess that the section of the Act was mostly directed to limit monopoly powers from hamstringing competition in markets.
Yep. So show me a human who isn't an idiot and who will stand for election somewhere. Better, a lot of them.
There ain't no such thing as a free market, and there never was. That's just just a go-to story for egoists and corporations.
Is Torrent Freak pro-infringement? Perhaps. And that is completely irrelevant. The word "torrent"? Also irrelevant.
We are all pirates and pro-infringement? Well OK then. I am glad you know each and every one of us better than we do ourselves, and what we say repeatedly should be ignored i suppose.
Have a nice day.
Oh good lord, the porn filter bill is the Human Trafficking Prevention Act. Whiskey Tango Alpha Foxtrot, on approach.
Why is this back again? Or perhaps, why did it take a vacation? Hmmm.
_Read that again. The argument is that, in effect, because Twitter has failed to ban similar "left-wing groups" this is discrimination._
Are there similar left wing groups? (There are some to be sure, but again they are more a minority than the white racist groups, who are also apparently right-wing by their own claims here.) Pretty sure the actual counterpart in a sensible argument is, do they kick off other hate extremists like extremists, terrorists, and their sympathizers? They sure as hell do that is they are Muslim or associated with some other "unamerican" polity.
Going to find me a person
Going to tie him up
To the whipping post
And beat the living shit out of him 'til the guy in the audience is satisfied
Awwww. Did you hunt the mammoth?
Why do i suddenly have a Spike Jones tune running through my head?
They all advertise like they are even remotely cognizant, never mind supportive, of small / family farming. They are not. And there is very little private farming acreage, on the whole.
There is a huge difference, for sure, but your not-driverless car is insecure already.
Giant corporations with insecure products are certainly not fly-by-night, but they are at least partly dodgy. Whether or not you consider some of their devices to be "IoT" or not, they are insecure (possibly by design) and networked. Just, idk - Google, Cisco.
I realize that some of you are arguing against some extreme claims, but you are, at the same instance, making somewhat extreme assumptions yourselves.
Also, driverless cars are not yet in production. That rather tends to change things. Will these cars be magically better than current and historical automobiles?
They may have thought they might get cheap PR points, but that isn't really happening, and it is pretty damn clear by now. Job fail. I guess that goes under "we made so much noise that now we have to follow through even if it is a gunshot to the foot".
When a fair chunk of the things you experience in life are racially motivated, you become suspicious of the rest.
Of course, one could have simply written a ticket and handed it to the driver without all the other opportunistic bullshit, but whatever.
Re:
Exactly.