RISC architecture CPUs are still used differently than 86/64 CPUs. The continuing drop in the x86 market is the general purpose desktop being killed off. (I'd go for a RISC system for an open source OS, at least with one of the more current chips that basically are comparable in function to x86, or with board design that covers what the main processor doesn't.)
Do copyright strikes come from drones now? Just wondering.
Maybe i would have, maybe not. But i would say now that "rather" is a lame position. I would personally prefer the trifecta of no laws against community broadband, NN regulations worth a damn and enforced, and limits on corporations in general. Anti-monopoly laws are underused and too narrowly used when they are considered. Remove the captured regulations that corporations lobby for or write themselves? Sure.
However, treating a thing as a monopoly and regulating it as such when it is one due to lack of competition is not bad regulation. Regulation securing monopolies (blocking others from the market) are bad, and i don't see anyone arguing against that.
Dumping on everyone because a positive rule doesn't do all the other things you want, which are in different categories and should also be addressed, certainly, makes no sense. So yeah, people will dump right back. See the thing is, both the bad things you don't like, and the better goals you want both occur by getting an initial toehold in one thing, then proceeding from there. Because you aren't impressed with the previous NN rules (which were not entirely great, but a positive step anyway) doesn't make other people stupid.
Otherwise, i am not sure why people who speak as authority and tell everyone else they are stupid get dumped on sometimes. Is mystery.
It's attributed to the author correctly.
Sure. Sounds good to me.
I am guessing the entire comment is based on sheer projection and not reading the article or anything it links to, or is otherwise related to it. It is probably copypasted itself. Hell it's probably a forum sig somewhere.
True, but that is both an enforceable policy and also puts the onus on the government for protection of government work. There can always be failures, but the attack surface would be way smaller, and frankly, the heavy security crackers and enforcers (like from the NSA) should be advising all government IT departments on threats and mitigation. Also IT departments should be properly staffed and funded to do their jobs. (Yeah right, i know.)
Need more cranks!
The City Which Shall Not Be Named.
This would be a hideous postal address, but safe, i suppose. It's going to be hell for tourism. Ĺ to da radimo na odmoru? Come to the City Which Shall Not Be Named. Let it happen now!™
First thing i thought of also. What a pair these two institutions could be.
IKR? That silenced group just keeps showing up everywhere more and more. They have voice and reach far exceeding their numbers. I feel so bad that they are shut out of every conversation.
OEMs will switch to AMD, at least in some portion of their offerings, for similar reasons as when they used AMD in the past: cost, or some feature. Considering AMD and Intel both have other IME flaws, and i don't see security as being a big point of consideration with OEMs anyway, i imagine you have a fair point here.
They keep ignoring the better nerds who actually do encryption. If Apple is actually rolling their own, the FBI probably already has what it wants and just doesn't know it. Or again, broken encryption isn't really what they want, or only part of it. They want to keep shifting what the public is used to, and probably even for no really good police-state reason, but just to suit their authoritarian tastes.
_There is NO "bomb-hoisting" even possible if you understand the notion!_
Wuh? Bomba nu explody? Modern warfare is a lie!
NYPD finally does something semi-reasonable, gets sued by slightly more unreasonable union. No film at 11.
Absolutely wrong. Cannot be true. Socialism! Bureaucracies! This is impossible. Freedom! Something something reasons!
"I'm not offended that they threw public officials in there (the non-disclosure agreement)," he said.
Irrrrrrrrelevant!
Legislation and law enforcement should not be predicated upon whether some sitting fsckwit is offended or not. (Of course that is a part of their personal reasons for making law or holding anyone accountable, but you aren't supposed to say it out loud.)
Their AI should not be reading my shit, period.
That's where the problem starts.
Let FB do a suicide watch? Are you insane? And quite frankly, if they can "do" (for various values of "do") that, then they can: Catch all the bad guys, identify exactly who is dangerous and who is not, identify exactly what is "bad" speech in every jurisdiction, identify exactly what is fake news, etc.
I'm sorry, but fsck people's "AI"s and their data farming. Call it "innovation", because don't. It's about as real, useful, and good as the whole fake-ass financial sector, or advertising and marketing.