The UCPD says the money taken from the vendor has been booked into evidence.
All of it?
Also, is it common to collect evidence for a misdemeanor? I mean beyond the scope of harassment. Can the money be used to pay off the fine for not having a permit?
they only read this part of your comment right?Mostly because that's all that uploaded before they got sick of waiting...
If this passes I suspect the police in PA will just start arresting affluent-looking people who happen to be near protests, just to help foot the bill.
The bill doesn't seem to address the issue of how much of the bill would be charged- if there are 500 people there, and 10 are charged (and of course found guilty) would each person found guilty of something be charged 1/500 or 1/10 of the costs? Or am I optimistic in thinking that they wouldn't each be charged 100% of the costs?
Ultimately, the role of the TSA in securing public safety is so significant that we ought not create a damages remedy in this context.
It seems like the Court is saying that actions such as harassing passengers, providing false information to police officers, and lying under oath in a court of law are all part of the job description of TSA agents? I fail to see how any of those actions help with 'securing public safety'. But what actions will be protected next? Will TSA agents be allowed to shoot passengers if their bag looks suspicious, or if the screening line gets too long? Maybe expensive jewelry or electronics will be deemed 'suspicious' and subject to forfeit. Possibly attractive passengers will be selected for 'special screening' in a back room? All OK with this court apparently, as the TSA agents job is just too important to hold them liable. Brilliant.
There is a market for this. A day or two is ok, but when we go away for more than a few days we have to board our cats. Nothing fancy like the Cateau, though, don't want them to get spoiled.
Next time one of these fraudulent arrest warrants is issued, instead of turning themselves in they should just slowly roll past the police station in a white Ford Bronco...
Seems like the judge was using any flimsy excuse he could to save the police and town from civil liability. Hopefully an appeals court will be able to correct this. IANAL, but it seems like the method he was arrested is irrelevant, and that he would have some level of valid complaint stemming from the mere existence of the fraudulent arrest warrant.
How about slot machines themed after Confederate General Stonewall Jackson?
but since he was placed in a high pressure situation he cracked in a bad way.Yeah, he meant to go to a Nazi rally held in a spa.
he had a fairly astounding 14 sources for his story.
Maybe he just wants to find out who the 14 are. His possible motives:
1: "I've only sent 12 pics, two of those sources didn't actually get one- yet."
2: "I've sent out 15 pics, that means one of them liked it! I must find out who at any cost..."
So any chance of Sheriff Larpenter or Detective Prestenbach facing charges for presenting false information to the court? Judges usually don't like it when they're lied to.
He should have just given the monkey a banana and called the selfie a work for hire...
If you look at it from their point of view, they were indeed hit by a DDoS.Distraught Denizens overloading System? The only one trying to 'deny service' is the FCC.
Soon all that will mean is that you've already been stopped by the police.
Now, E and J Gallo apparently offered Landa the rights to keep his name, but only if he limited his sales to 2 states.
Are those the states of confusion and disbelief?
Darlek? Isn't that how Cybermen spell Dalek? -Oh no they're back again!
notoriously jammed up district court calendar that caused overcrowding at the jail
Is this one of those for-profit private jails? It would be interesting to see if anyone in the court system owns part of any local private jails. Nice how they don't have funding to prosecute them but they have funding to keep them in jail.
It's tough to prove a recording existed prior to an alleged deletion when recordings that survive officers' deletion attempts usually absolves them of attempted deletion allegations.
Is this trying to say that just because the officer failed in their attempt to delete a video, or that video can be recovered, that they can't be charged with trying to delete the video? Isn't that like claiming that I can't be given a speeding ticket because now I'm stopped on the side of the road?
I don't know how I will Console myself...
I think that pun is definitive proof that typography jokes are the best of all possible jokes.It certainly seems their Times have come...
I'd have been sent up the river for 'possession of Doritos with intent to distribute' (based on amount, though it's really all for personal use) years ago.