....he's a far-right wing libertarian nutjob/hypocrite who was pissed off for some reason and didn't like his job, so he bailed out of it to Hong Kong & Russia with information the NSA has a right to have.
The sad, sorry tale can be found here:
In 2009, Ed Snowden said leakers ?should be shot.? Then he became one
As well as here (and this applies to anybody who believed this servile dunce):
How the Professional Left's Blind Obama Hatred Got them Played by a Far-Right Nutjob
Whistleblower My Ass: Snowden's Russia Connection Confirmed by Putin
Making a hero out of a whiny crybaby lunatic far-right wing libertarian nut job that stole data that compromised the safety of the United States-and who then fled to the arms of a authoritarian leader isn't helping the cause that Techdirt agitates about.
I don't particularly give a fling fuck about your hatred of the majors, or of pop; if it doesn't float your boat, as Mr. Spock once said, 'there are always alternatives'. And, you've not answered my question; what would happen if nobody cared for white people alternative rock/punk/country/whatever? The whole wishing for WMG, EMI, Sony, and UMG to die is (to be frank) you hating urban, pop, and dance because they're the top dog as far as what people like to listen to in music is concerned. Is your need to be entertained worth the loss of these companies, the jobs that people have with them, and the legacies that they represent?
Also, how sure are you that any of the independent companies won't get and develop middlemen of their own? What makes you so sure of human nature that what happens now won't happen again? Just because a company's independent doesn't mean it's perfect; things can change.
What is this 'next phase', and how will anybody else (besides you and all of the other commenters) benefit from it? It seems to me that the only reason you want the industry to collapse is for the same reasons as seen at Disco Demolition Night back in the '70's, except only with pop and the current dance music instead of disco.
Again, I'll remind you that not everybody cares for what would come out of these independent record companies that everybody here hope would take over after the collapse of the four big companies. What would happen if nobody cared for white people alternative rock/punk/country/whatever? And what if said companies fill the gap for those of us (which is most of the population) that cares for and likes pop and dance? Do you or anybody else here have a plan to cater to that section of the world's population? Or do you want them to just dive off of a cliff since you don't give a shit about them?
As I said before to somebody else, any unemployed people are bad for a nation, and any company that goes out of business (especially companies with a prestigious history like EMI and the record companies that make up Warner Music Group, or Kodak) is bad for any nation and the world. You may not give a shit, but EMI has had a prestigious history of recording music, as have the other three companies-those are not legacies to just be dismissed and thrown away like so much used paper, but to be preserved (in EMI's case, it's the cultural legacy of England itself.) This means a lot even if these companies have gone astray.
That assumes that everybody on Earth-young and old, black and white, brown, red, and yellow-want to listen to what indie companies would be putting out after said collapse of the major labels. It also assumes that said indies could even meet the demand for said artists, and if demand for said artists from said indie labels exists.
Hopefully the indies will take note of the errors the majors are making and will learn from them becoming enablers that will help spread the word and connect the artists to the fans. They will not monetize on mere sales of plastic discs or digital files but rather in providing a service to the artists and to the fans.
I'm sorry, but I don't like <>i>anybody being unemployed-not even employees of the big record companies. If people think that Warner Music Group and EMI should change, then, that's fine, but wanting the companies to go out of business and the employees to be unemployed is just completely wack. How would you like it if I said that all of the independent record companies that you and everybody else here love so much should go out of work, and the employees of those companies be unemployed?
I guess that you want to stay poor, then.
According to you. But if your kids and you weren't such lazy asses, you'd find new and vital artists to support instead of just regurgitating old music from the past.
Here are some pointers:
Exclaim (www.exclaim.ca)
The Wedge (http://www.muchmusic.com/music/thewedge/)
...then the CPC's economic mandarins wouldn't be trying to get co-productions between Hollywood studios and Chinese movie companies (in mainland China) started, would they?
Also, I don't know that the movies made after the handover were any different than the movies made before the handover. Is it possible that David's right about this one?
My daughter just moved to the UK, and is having a problem being able to play DVDs she bought legally. Bunk.
That which kills an entire industry might have bad effects on the rest of the economy.
And have you heard some of the stuff coming out these days? The recording industry is definitely how you kill music.
Let me guess, Skrillex, deadmau5, Adele, etc. are all killing music? And music is only great when it's white people rock and not anything else?
And when said happy event happens, be prepared for a downturn that might end up having an adverse effect on the world economy, just because you hate what's coming out of EMI or Warner Music Group. Real nice, wishing for people to be unemployed.
Better thing to do (especially if you're an American?) Legislate for the radio industry (the real culprit in all of this, IMHO) to be regulated like it used to be, which might have an effect on what stations become popular enough; if said stations are the kind that emphasize artists like Bon Iver or Arcade Fire, and they become popular in their market because of what they do, then things might get 'better' (no pop music overwhelming everything) instead of 'worse'.
A regional act is any act that's a local band (town, city, etc) that hasn't yet made it big nationally or internationally. Even today, there are still regional acts/artists that aren't big.
The Rhiannas, Biebers and Gagas aren't making the music industry any worse than the previous generations of pop music from the mid to late 20th century. And destroying the music industry would only likely cause ripple that would result in a recession anyway. Wishing for a version of Disco Demolition Night won't work either.
What should be done is the encouragement of radio stations like this one about to open in Toronto: Indie 88.1
The reason that radio changed wasn't because of the labels as it was because of Clinton signing a bill into law that got rid of the restriction banning any company from owning more than a set number of stations in any American city. When that law was passed allowing it back in 1995, then radio became the shit hole we now know it as. Labels (and I'm not defending them, mind you) had little to do with it other than to do what they usually do.
Re: The Results
..and that cause is commercial radio, by dint of now always needing to make a ton of profit all of the time, and always signing up pop 'musicians' and 'singers' that will make back their profits for them by singing about nothing but the moon and June (just like Marvin Gaye used to do before personal problems and the way the world at the time made him write and compose What's Going On-too bad a similar catharsis can happen to any of the pop artists we have now.)
Best thing to do? Just avoid radio (if you're doing that already, keep on doing it) and download/use Spotifiy, etc. as much as possible.