Here is my idea. If you are accused of a crime and are required to give a DNA sample and later proven innocent then your 'profile' should be removed from CODIS. This will most likely take a court case to get compliance from the justice department (good luck there). It will likely have to go all the way to the Supreme Court which will hopefully draw enough attention to it. Otherwise, your DNA sample was taken and you are guilty of the crime then your DNA stays in CODIS. Hey, if you commit a crime you lose some rights. Now if your brother commits a crime they can hit you up for information. I'm sorry but if you are a convicted criminal you lose some rights, privacy in this instance.
'differences in voting patterns between the e-votes and absentee ballots certainly raised some eyebrows'
I would think absentee voters were a little more educated in the races than those who show up to vote for a governor and pick the name at the top of the list in the other slots.
Anybody calling their laptop a "lappy" doesn't deserve to get it back.
C'mon! You can't take away Strongbad's email responding abilities!
Armenia adopts a law to appease foreign countries and content industry pressure. I would guess that we won't see much enforcement. It will probably only be selectively enforced against government opponents similar to the tax code here in the U.S.
I could see how physicals could be making a comeback with vinyl special editions, boxed sets, etc.
Hackers: So now we have a list of 114k hipster-suckers!
Wow! Jessica Simpson as Metroid...this film has no chance...no chance whatsoever.
That would suck to be the one guy.
Is whoever told the mayor David Wallace about the posts, emails, or whatever also being prosecuted? They should be according to this judge.
Yes...good thing you live in Canada...please stay!
Sorry, no Denny's in Des Moines according to Dennys.com...I guess Iowa is less redneck than you thought.
So someone got a patent...I will give the benefit of the doubt that they may have 'innovated'...now you will just sell off the 'innovation' to someone else (lawyers mainly) to make millions who had no involvement in the creative process. The patent system...PROTECTING THE INNOVATORS!?
I am guessing that, representing rights holders in one country, they figure if they are sending threat notices out and people are paying out of fear and misunderstanding of the law, why not see how many people would pay up from a legal threat notice from rights holders in another country.
Just one testicle...mind you.
Obama better avoid turning his head left, tilting his head slightly, looking slightly above the viewer or he could get sued by the AP.
You guys are all loosers! =]
Oh Noes! It looks like TAM may be right for once. This is definitely a day to revel in TAM. Too bad most of us will forget.
Guess I'll be leaving my photocopier at home now. =(
Re: Re: We will need a court case
If you are accused of rape you probably want to give up a DNA sample to prove your innocence before you are wrongly convicted. =)