Still, the DMSA feels it has the right to complain about US tech companies being less than compliant with D-notices they’re not obliged to comply with.Are you suggesting they don't have that right?
Remember, the "S" in IoT is for security.
Last summary, a study at NYU showed that when you take away algorithmic feedsThere's no such thing as a non-algorithmic feed. Chronological? That's an algorithm. Random? An algorithm. A computer cannot display information without using an algorithm to do so.
No “woe is me, how can you treat me so badly?”You've got to be kidding me. "I am greeted with a hostile press the likes of which no president has ever seen," Trump, 73, claimed Sunday night during a Fox News virtual town hall in front of the Lincoln Memorial. "The closest would be that gentleman right up there," Trump said while pointing at Lincoln's statue. "They always said nobody got treated worse than Lincoln. I believe I am treated worse." - May 2020 "Abraham Lincoln, they say, was, you know, he had a civil war going on. All right. But Abraham Lincoln had — was just vilified. He was," the former president said. "But now they say Trump got treated the worst of all..." - May 2023 He says he was treated worse than the president who got shot in the head. I could go on, and on, and on. How badly he's been treated is one of his favorite things to talk about. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/04/19/18-times-donald-trump-complained-about-being-treated-unfairly/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/17/donald-trump-presidency-media-coverage-russia-scandal https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-says-he-has-been-treated-very-unfairly-by-people-who-wrote-constitution
Not that I agree with them, but their complaint is not quite as stupid as that makes it sound. They say that Jesus washed the feet of his followers, not just anyone. However, that complaint implies that the people pictured (the only one I remember off the top of my head is someone getting an abortion but there were others that RWNJ would object to as well) could not possibly be Christians. Which is less stupid, and more evil. So on the whole I think they're even worse than you made them out to be.
There is no 10% standard; fair use is just case by case. Under some circumstances you could use the entire work under fair use.
a mark on their record for the next five years.Also it should be read aloud at the beginning of every case they preside over for that period. A little public humiliation could go a long way.
And was censured by congress (including my own Congressman!) for the temerity of being Palestinian while her people were victims of a genocide.She was censured for something she said, not for being Palestinian, and I'm pretty sure you knew that.
There is no second amendment claim for generative artificial intelligence.They're not weapons.
There is no legitimate use for generative artificial intelligence.I've used it to help me with my work. Was that illegitimate?
Generative artificial intelligence chatbots is another round of terrorism, criminal negligence, dereliction of duty, lemon law violations, bait and switch, identity theft, & fraud, by tech, in collusion with governments, military, haelthcare, mental healthcare, DARPA, & the finanxial sector.Do you have any more spaghetti, or has it all been thrown at the wall now?
Maybe they're doing it on purpose because of the belief that "all publicity is good publicity". OK not likely.
It's relevant (at least to PR) when one party is claiming to be motivated by concern for a third party.
neither, in general, deserve your vote.That's a great way to let the worse party win.
their tears claiming that people are being mean to them hold no water.The tears... hold no water?
It’s not clear if a handful of class action lawsuits will be enough to shift the company’s thinking back to reality, but being so obnoxious that you permanently pollute the HP brand reputation in the mind of an entire generation of future shoppers might just do the trick.It won't. HP is in a long, slow, and permanent decline. They will not be able to make the kind of decisions necessary to bring them back. I can't predict when they will shut down but it will not surprise me when it happens.
The question was literally What does ‘woke’ mean to you?Yes, and it was specifically asked of people (even more specifically, Democrats and progressives) who use the term as a pejorative. That is an extremely important distinction that you left out.
My point is only that "gay" and "lesbian" are not mutually exclusive terms. Nothing more.
So the social media companies should offer to make copies of a file for people to distribute themselves?
Franklin clearly understands that printing stuff is a business, and while he finds certain things objectionable, he is obligated to at least print them if he’s offered money.If he understood that, it wasn't mentioned in the quote. What he said was, "I would print the piece separately if desired". No mention of being obligated to do so.
why the FBI didn’t spend its time and money investigating and prosecuting its lead informant. "As was revealed on cross examination, in the years prior to his becoming an FBI asset, Hussain engaged repeatedly in activity that constituted various crimes, including bankruptcy fraud, tax evasion, immigration fraud, perjury, and mail fraud."Two possibilities come to mind: those aren't terrorism, which is all the FBI cares about these days, and investigating an actual criminal takes work.