In countries like mine (Uruguay), prostitution is a regulated job. Workers pay taxes, have medical insurance, and sometimes get interviewed on television.
There's also sex trafficking, just like there's legal and illegal fishing.
Sex trafficking is a terrible and must be fought. But prostitution should be regualted like any other economic activity with supply and demand.
Duh, it's a trap. If you saw something (say underage porn), you are a criminal. Saying it means that you consumer will get punished, not the publishers.
I've read that companies oppose the use of a brand for unrelated products, feating for dillution of the brand, is a legal requirement to keep the trademark. If they don't do it, others can claim "hey, the company isn't protecting its trademark, so it's invalid".
Mega corporations are working hard to find smaller (less large) comporations to acquire. Not everyone will find a dating partner. So in this Trump administration there's some serious competition indeed.
Perhaps it was an anti-neutrality person trying to impersonate a pro-neutrality person trying to discredit the anti-neutrality, therefore trying to discredit the pro-neutrality.
Or perhaps it was a pro-neutrality person trying to imperson an anti-neutrality person trying to impersonate a pro-neutrality person trying to discredit the anti-neutrality, who would try to discredit the pro-neutrality, therefore trying to discredit the anti-neutrality.
Several criminals communicate using mail. How can FedEx and DHL allow them to do that? They should inspect every letter and package to see if there is any suspicious message or content.
Several criminals use cars and motorcycles to do their stuff. How can vehicle manufacturers, fuel stations and toll boothsallow it? THey should inspect every passenger to make sure that there's no suspect using their services.
"wine and tequila might be said to be in the same or similar marketplaces, but it's more accurate to say they are in tangential markets. Both products might be sold in the same store, for instance, but nobody is going to accidentally buy a bottle of wine with the intention of buying tequila.
It's something I have been arguing for years: the marketplace distinction for trademarks needs to be more nuanced than a marketplace designation for something like alcoholic beverages."
I disagree with that reasoning. Companies often produce different kinds of products, like Diageo, Coca Cola and Red Bull. And they may try to use the same brand for different products.
If a customer sees a Pumpd energy drink and a Pumpd vodka, they may think they are from the same company.
In this case, Tequika Cuervo sounds Mexican and Il Corvo sounds Italian.
(untitled comment)
Congratulations, Mike!
Greetings from Uruguay
Re: The Olympic Committee's legal department
Business as usual.
Re: Olympics killed the Greeks
The International Gymnastics Federation wants to claim ownership of parkour.
Re: Re:
Correct, except for non-timed, turn-based videogames.
Re: True...
Not every deal is legal just because all parties signed for it. Voluntary slavery is an old example.
(untitled comment)
Let customers decide if they want encryption or not.
(untitled comment)
So the NCAA tells a college sports player he can't play because he has a web video channel. That's a direct attack to freedom of speech, period.
(untitled comment)
Also the old Indy Racing League had a blue / red silhouette logo.
Anyway, nobody would ever confuse Overwatch with baseball. I mean, they are totally different demographic groups.
(untitled comment)
Deleting hate speech won't reduce hate, it will reduce speech.
(untitled comment)
In countries like mine (Uruguay), prostitution is a regulated job. Workers pay taxes, have medical insurance, and sometimes get interviewed on television.
There's also sex trafficking, just like there's legal and illegal fishing.
Sex trafficking is a terrible and must be fought. But prostitution should be regualted like any other economic activity with supply and demand.
(untitled comment)
Duh, it's a trap. If you saw something (say underage porn), you are a criminal. Saying it means that you consumer will get punished, not the publishers.
(untitled comment)
I've read that companies oppose the use of a brand for unrelated products, feating for dillution of the brand, is a legal requirement to keep the trademark. If they don't do it, others can claim "hey, the company isn't protecting its trademark, so it's invalid".
It's not a legal drama, it's a legal farce.
(untitled comment)
It's unclear just how (insert emoticon) Tissot was with the message
Companies can show emoticons, not emotions.
Re: Re:
Smash Bros is a fighting game. The oldest known to Earth animals, other than sex.
(untitled comment)
The Department of Justice should be completely independent from the federal executive.
(untitled comment)
Mega corporations are working hard to find smaller (less large) comporations to acquire. Not everyone will find a dating partner. So in this Trump administration there's some serious competition indeed.
Re:
Perhaps it was an anti-neutrality person trying to impersonate a pro-neutrality person trying to discredit the anti-neutrality, therefore trying to discredit the pro-neutrality.
Or perhaps it was a pro-neutrality person trying to imperson an anti-neutrality person trying to impersonate a pro-neutrality person trying to discredit the anti-neutrality, who would try to discredit the pro-neutrality, therefore trying to discredit the anti-neutrality.
(untitled comment)
Several criminals communicate using mail. How can FedEx and DHL allow them to do that? They should inspect every letter and package to see if there is any suspicious message or content.
Several criminals use cars and motorcycles to do their stuff. How can vehicle manufacturers, fuel stations and toll boothsallow it? THey should inspect every passenger to make sure that there's no suspect using their services.
(untitled comment)
"wine and tequila might be said to be in the same or similar marketplaces, but it's more accurate to say they are in tangential markets. Both products might be sold in the same store, for instance, but nobody is going to accidentally buy a bottle of wine with the intention of buying tequila.
It's something I have been arguing for years: the marketplace distinction for trademarks needs to be more nuanced than a marketplace designation for something like alcoholic beverages."
I disagree with that reasoning. Companies often produce different kinds of products, like Diageo, Coca Cola and Red Bull. And they may try to use the same brand for different products.
If a customer sees a Pumpd energy drink and a Pumpd vodka, they may think they are from the same company.
In this case, Tequika Cuervo sounds Mexican and Il Corvo sounds Italian.
(untitled comment)
Less consumer choice is never a good idea.
How many homes would have just one broadband internet provider?