"How do we promote international law when we ignore it whenever convenient?"
Er, Nagasaki and Hiroshima? Vietnam? Condor Plan? Two Irak wars? Afghanistan?
"There is no reason to believe a Trump-controlled FTC will target Musk’s services"
Well, things have changed this week...
Corollary: be careful when describing examples of a statement.
You Americans are pretty dumb.
You have all federal attorneys, solicitors and law enforcement officers gathered in a single executive department, headed by a president appointee.
At the very least, the attorney general should be appointed by the congress, and have no control of law enforcement.
Fun fact: Nazis said to be anti-capitalists, as that was a Jewish thing.
Of course, what the actually did was to loot the Jews and share it with Nazi sympathisers.
The article is misleading.
"a mark for merely the number eight introduces a much higher chance for confusion than those other examples"
Earnhardt's trademark wasn't for "merely the number eight", but for an "illustration drawing" of "a stylized number 8", as in the font. And it was just for clothing, toy vehicles and car racing.
Here’s the thing about “hate crime” laws: they deal with historically marginalized groups with immutable characteristics.
That's not true. Hate crimes can be done for any reason, like rooting for the Los Angeles Clippers, wearing Crocs with docks, and/or eating pinespple pizza.
"business executives who are concerned about their safety after the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson (who would likely have access to corporate security anyway)"
Smelks like the true target are non-corporative business executive. I mean druglords.
Speaking of cars and privacy...
https://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/volkswagen-konzern-datenleck-wir-wissen-wo-dein-auto-steht-a-e12d33d0-97bc-493c-96d1-aa5892861027
Most Jewish-American billionaires support the Republican Party.
Also, Soros is well-known to support progressive causes worldwide, just like many other billionaires support conservative causes.
There's too many articles about fair use like this one that don't mention copyleft. It's not fair if the derivative work is privative.
BTW in 2018 the F1 was challenged by 3M, as it's basically identical to its Futuro logo.
I understand the criticism of false balance. But I disagree that journalists shouldn't worry about why people don't believe them. Truth is not enough.
The Hill may or may not be a "DC gossip rag", but calling it names won't make TD more trustworthy.
"How do we promote international law when we ignore it whenever convenient?" Er, Nagasaki and Hiroshima? Vietnam? Condor Plan? Two Irak wars? Afghanistan?
A wild shining phone and MVNO has appeared!
"There is no reason to believe a Trump-controlled FTC will target Musk’s services" Well, things have changed this week... Corollary: be careful when describing examples of a statement.
Minitrue sources have reveled the draft on obscenity standard:
You Americans are pretty dumb. You have all federal attorneys, solicitors and law enforcement officers gathered in a single executive department, headed by a president appointee. At the very least, the attorney general should be appointed by the congress, and have no control of law enforcement.
Fun fact: Nazis said to be anti-capitalists, as that was a Jewish thing. Of course, what the actually did was to loot the Jews and share it with Nazi sympathisers.
The article is misleading. "a mark for merely the number eight introduces a much higher chance for confusion than those other examples" Earnhardt's trademark wasn't for "merely the number eight", but for an "illustration drawing" of "a stylized number 8", as in the font. And it was just for clothing, toy vehicles and car racing.
"business executives who are concerned about their safety after the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson (who would likely have access to corporate security anyway)" Smelks like the true target are non-corporative business executive. I mean druglords.
Warning: reading this article may cause traumatic brain injury.
Additional metaphors: * The Schrödinger's employee * The invisible white employee * Invisible Boy (as the Mystery Men character)
Speaking of cars and privacy... https://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/volkswagen-konzern-datenleck-wir-wissen-wo-dein-auto-steht-a-e12d33d0-97bc-493c-96d1-aa5892861027
Sorry, we shouldn't celebrate a massive company "sneaking in" such a significative feature secretely.
Most Jewish-American billionaires support the Republican Party. Also, Soros is well-known to support progressive causes worldwide, just like many other billionaires support conservative causes.
Orwell would claim it's designed to diminish the range of thought - or of complaint.
I'm still surprised that conservatives still use the term "liberal arts" with positive connotations.