One would also like a pony. (Hey, if we're going to wish for things, why not? It's at least as likely to happen as all those other things....)
In most of my classes, I list books as recommended rather than required; the only exceptions are those (very few) classes for which I believe the book is really critical. I've done this for almost 20 years now, mostly because of the skyrocketing cost of textbooks. I also always list online references for those who don't want to buy a book at all. I have never felt right about requiring that students buy anything that I might get royalties from, so for classes I teach where I use my own textbook, I never make it required, and I always tell my students about other equivalent texts.
One thing I've noticed about the comment spammers here is how many of them actually create accounts in order to post their spam. I do see the occasional "drive-by" (anonymous) spam comment, but it seems to be much more common that the spammer will register, post one or two spam comments, and then disappear.
Well, yeah, if you want to be all adult and rational about it. But if you're looking for something to prosecute, where's the fun in that? It's kind of like living in a small off-the-beaten-track town - you don't have cable, so you have to make your own fun. Plus, the way things are now, you get to be all big and powerful and can go around touting your good deeds and spouting off about how you, at least, are "thinking of the children".
I'm shocked - shocked! - to find that gambling is going on in here!
Yeah, that would be like selling consoles with the promise that you could run other operating systems on them - say, Linux - and then retroactively taking away that capability. Nobody would be crazy enough to do that, would they?
Why not both?
Oh, great. Because of this, Georgia no longer has any incentive to create new laws! I hope Mr. Malamud is happy.
Maybe because they're regulated public utilities, and the regulations say they can't?
The FBI has been creating its own "terrorists" for years; now it's branching out into child pornography. It began by keeping child porn servers online, now it's trumping up charges against people who annoy it. What's next - fabricating images and planting them?
Yeah, that's gonna happen. While we're wishing, I'd like a pony.
The FCC needed something that sounded plausible to explain away the failure of their comment infrastructure, and someone latched onto the first "technical" idea that sounded plausible. Unfortunately, that person didn't know enough about the subject to realize that it could easily be debunked.
A classic example of the "sunk cost" fallacy - literally.
Boy, am I glad that comment was held for moderation; otherwise, I might have had to actually read it.
If this is the "silver lining", I'm really in favor of trying to find a different dark cloud.
So, David Bowie and Prince were both pioneers in the digital realm, eh? And they're both dead now. Coincidence? I think not!
Save for the fact he intended people to get hurtMaybe. It's also conceivable that he didn't even think about that possibility when he made the call, assuming that the SWAT team would figure it all out before actually opening fire on someone. After all, it's well known that SWAT teams never shoot people accidentally, or throw flash-bangs into baby cribs, right?
Feature creep?
For now, at least. How long until someone finds a "good reason" to expand its use, or mandate its installation, do you suppose?