If so, he probably went blind from rolling his eyes into the back of his head.
The next step is for these EU Regulators is to demand that all these articles about this stupid decision be forgotten.
The people in power have the most to gain from this ruling, so you can bet your ass they're going to support it.
It wasn't "thin air" where they got those numbers. It was a fundamental orifice.
Excuse me, but there is a huge difference between illegal and wrong. If you are charged with oversight, then nothing should be off limits. If the CIA is actively trying to thwart your investigation, then it's your job to go behind their backs.
Can we get the NSA to hire these Prenda clowns? That way we can keep all the douchebags in one place.
"And now we have a contractor employee, not a government employee, who has access to information which is, when revealed, most damaging to the standing prestige of the United States and our relations with some of our best friends." There, he said it. The real reason everybody is pissed off at Snowden is because he embarrassed the US government.
Here's an article I found on Salon that talks about "rentiers" that are the true drain on our economy. The ratcheting up of IP controls seem to help enable this.
http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/
I watched it last night (I've got Comcast). It was pretty funny. BTW, it's already available in all the usual illegal places.
P.S. Your buddy Louis CK was on too. Very funny guy.
I read the parent comment as satire. I hope I'm right.
In the early days of emusic.com, you could find albums of older acts (BJ Thomas and John Prine come to mind) that were actually re-recordings of their old hits. Sometimes they were better than the originals, sometimes not.
If you really want to mess with the "fundamental" parts of Hollywood's business, how about attacking "Hollywood Accounting." The most fundamental part of their business is to screw over as many as possible.
They keep using this excuse. If nothing is going to change, why bother with it in the first place.
You forgot option 3:
Screw the artist and screw the customer at the same time. This would be completely consistent with past behavior.
Once he's bought, he stays bought.
He never said the the laws were effective, just that those laws are the monopoly's only hope. If you add his point of the collateral damage to your point of "It ain't going to work anyway," you come to the conclusion that these laws are really bad.
This quote has been attributed to Samuel Johnson:
www.samueljohnson.com/refuge.html
It seems like it still applies.
How will they square this up with the previous post about France requiring data retention? You can't retain it and delete it at the same time.
Maybe you could reconvene the panel on the Jerry Springer Show. Also invite Hulk Hogan to bust some heads. It would generate enough cash to fix the entire recording industry.
I think you could make an argument that it's format shifting. If IBM purchased all of the books, scanned then into Watson, and kept the physical books. I don't see much difference between that and me buying a CD and ripping it to Mp3's for my own personal use.
Actually, he's right
"It's pretty pathetic when athletes think they know the law."
Actually, he's right. It's pretty obvious by now that it's perfectly legal for the police can shoot anyone they want.