I'm featured as part of a TechDirt article!! Really surprised that Shiva decided to respond to my tweet considering he probably get similar tweets all the time...
Setting up the environment does not involve just the location. It is setting the framing and subject and the lighting of the photo. All of which the photographer did not do since the camera was operated by the monkey
Technically, yes. As you are the one who took the photo, you own the copyright to it. The thing is, most people wouldn't actually file copyright claims over something like this.
This is why photographers can use wedding pictures that they take in their portfolio because they own the copyright to them, and not the bride and groom (assuming there wasn't a contract that specifically reassign the copyright from photographer to the wedding party)
The Canadian constitution is completely locked up. Any major change require 50% of the province to agree, with the provinces making up 50% of the national population. Not to mention, any attempt to open up the constitution would lead to a flood of demands from the provinces for other changes before they give their support. Hence, the constitution is effectively locked up. Why else did you think Harper gave up on Senate reform as soon as the Supreme Court declared that it would require a constitutional amendment to change it?
I think if Jack Layton is still around, the NDP would definitely be a force to reckon with in the next election... The NDP just isn't the same without him
"online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist."
If this statement is true, then the person behind this secret blacklist obviously have an agenda they are pushing on the people. I find the fact that there is a fine for disclosing the list very disturbing... Not only is the public not allowed access to the list, anyone who leaks the list runs the risk of getting fined a not-insignificant amount of money... The whole purpose of the fine is obviously to hide the fact that the operator of the list has a bias....
How exactly would the fine work at $11,000 a day?? Once disclosed, the person who leaked the list can't exactly take back the leak. Wouldn't that mean the person will be charged a fine each day until bankruptcy?? I doubt this is true, but that is my interpretation based on the information above...
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by MizuRyuu.
I'm in a TechDirt article!!
I'm featured as part of a TechDirt article!! Really surprised that Shiva decided to respond to my tweet considering he probably get similar tweets all the time...
Re: Re: Re:
Setting up the environment does not involve just the location. It is setting the framing and subject and the lighting of the photo. All of which the photographer did not do since the camera was operated by the monkey
Re:
No, only to instagram
Re:
Technically, yes. As you are the one who took the photo, you own the copyright to it. The thing is, most people wouldn't actually file copyright claims over something like this.
This is why photographers can use wedding pictures that they take in their portfolio because they own the copyright to them, and not the bride and groom (assuming there wasn't a contract that specifically reassign the copyright from photographer to the wedding party)
Re:
None... just like I'm sure we are also tapping into the US without a warrant either, since you guys are foreigners...
Re: canada
The Canadian constitution is completely locked up. Any major change require 50% of the province to agree, with the provinces making up 50% of the national population. Not to mention, any attempt to open up the constitution would lead to a flood of demands from the provinces for other changes before they give their support. Hence, the constitution is effectively locked up. Why else did you think Harper gave up on Senate reform as soon as the Supreme Court declared that it would require a constitutional amendment to change it?
Re: Re: Re: I couldn't believe it when I logged in to the news this morning
I think if Jack Layton is still around, the NDP would definitely be a force to reckon with in the next election... The NDP just isn't the same without him
Send them completely redacted documents...
Re:
"online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist."
If this statement is true, then the person behind this secret blacklist obviously have an agenda they are pushing on the people. I find the fact that there is a fine for disclosing the list very disturbing... Not only is the public not allowed access to the list, anyone who leaks the list runs the risk of getting fined a not-insignificant amount of money... The whole purpose of the fine is obviously to hide the fact that the operator of the list has a bias....
How exactly would the fine work at $11,000 a day?? Once disclosed, the person who leaked the list can't exactly take back the leak. Wouldn't that mean the person will be charged a fine each day until bankruptcy?? I doubt this is true, but that is my interpretation based on the information above...