the control of information has always been about protecting the organization -- whether that be a corporation or a government. the real target is unwanted exposure. in the case of government this refers to dissidents .
hopefully we will see more BLANK devices for sale at NewEgg. I see some nasty rumors that MSFT wants to remove the option to switch UEFI off. the next step of course is to use the keys to control what o/s you are allowed to install. I don't think they will get too far
this thought is from Whitfield Diffie -- as expressed in his tesimony on behalf of NewEgg v TQP Holdings
to do business in a digital network world we need a means by which we can authenticate a document in public and at the same time retain personal control over the means of doing that
For example: the IRS should expect you so offer a digital signature on your 1040 -- and if you don't -- or if an invalid signature is offered -- the the form would be rejected as invalid . this programming could be included with tax software; all the user would need to do is enter his|her passphrase for the signature just before the submit is transmitted
the same thinking is applicable to transmittals of any importance,-- software, e/mail, online commerce,... the Thunderbird eMail client provides an excellent interface th GPG -- in the ENIGMAIL plug-in .
x.509 certificates would be a lot better -- if they were distributed with only marginal trust -- you would need to countersign just the ones you actually needed to use
local services such as credit unions should become involved in authenticating personal user keys and getting them uploaded to help with this
the thing that should be totally obvious is: if we continue business into the future on the same basis that we have used in the recent past -- hackers will make fools of us all.
="Let's repeat that last line, because it still seems that the powers that be don't get it: "
IMHO the understand it perfectly. and, as the song says "as soon as one door closes another door will open"
and so the game of whack a mole continues ad nauseum. another "sophisticated" (my ass) attack . another CVE. and then another patch, and another door is opened.
the business model of the internet is surveillance. i think this was noted by Bruce Schneier recently, if memory serves. and this is exploited by commercial interests, government, and crooks alike. Truly "a fool's paradise".
Open source should help. I hope. I use it, anyway.
verizon is essentially presenting a fallacy know as argument ad novitam: claiming x is right because it is new.
the opposite is also a fallacy: contending something is right because it's old.
experience is a better basis for evaluating any proposition.
our experience is that monopolies need to be regulated.
cable broadband clearly qualifies,-- we don't want 5 sets of cables handing on the poles.
this is and will continue to be a contentious issue.
Here in Michigan the Title II rule will bring broadband under the purview of the Michigan Public Service Commission -- which will give us a channel in which to resolve service issues -- a bit more effective than getting called an a-hole by some a-hole company.
Torvalds notes (p.95) of "Just for Fun" "If money was to get involved things would get murky. If you don't let money enter the picture you won't have greedy people".
greedy people we got and the lust to get adverts and recons into everyone's computer is stunningly vicious
I ran across this in a blog post today
oldschoolh4ck3r Welcome to the brave new world, where industries and governments collude to dissolve privacy and establish a digital battlefield. Deep-pocketed agencies can fund corporations towards their agendas of tainting technology in their favor, all the while pointing the finger at software 'bugs'. We're in a lot of trouble.
OpenSource and FSF software is the "Last Best Hope" for privacy and security
"dissonance" -- is simply the product of a disagreement
I found this on p.379 &ff of Gab. Coleman's new book THE MANY FACES OF ANONYMOUNS
"What surveillance really is, at its root, is a highly effective form of social control," reads an August Riseup newsletter. "The knowledge of always being watched changes our behavior and stifles dissent. The inability to associate secretly means there is no longer any possibility for free association. The inability to whisper means there is no longer any speech that is truly free of coercion, real or implied. Most profoundly, pervasive surveillance threatens to eliminate the most vital element of both democracy and social movements: the mental space for people to form dissenting and unpopular views."
the same sentiment is also stated in Glen Greenwald's recent NO PLACE TO HIDE ( Snowden story ). On page 3: "and history show the mere exstance of a mass surveillance aparatus, regardless of how it is used, is in itself sufficient to stifle dissent"
"It is error alone which requires the support of government. The truth, can stand on its own." - Thomas Jefferson.
the first step in cleaning up corruption is in exposing the truth. but government will see this as dissonance. this will be equated to "lies" or dis-information -- and suppressed,-- in order to preserve the"ordre public"
commercial pubs server their commercial masters and so also do political pubs serve also their political masters.
you would not expect to get an honest review of a Widget from a pub. which is taking advert. money from the company that makes Widgets.
today pubs often accept comments and such comments may help to shed the proper light on various subjects. and they do, at times. but at times good comments are flagged as "trolling" and trashed by the sys-admins.
the net bottom line is that each of us needs to "be our own man" -- not a "puppet on a string" -- manipulated by whatever public consensus can be blown up by advertisers and propagandists of the times.
this is the strongest reason for reclassifying the carriers under Title II. Here in Michigan you just tell them to cancel. Then if they bill you again you call the Public Service Commission and that *will* end the problem.
="And we wonder why Hollywood seems to have so much trouble learning how to embrace the internet."
throughout history executives will attempt to preserve cash cows at all costs. they all fail.
digital photograph was developed at Kodak. but Kodak was making a fortune on film and processing and chemicals. Can't have this digital crap around. Now, Kodak ain't around much anymore and the same will happen to other idiots who are attempting to save their precious cash cows.
remember what old Frank Roosevelt told us: "Anytime the government does anything you can bet it was carefully planned".
what changes will result from the Snowden leak? it's a puzzle: spooks always make every effort to be sure their accomplishments are not known. if Snowden was allowed to leak then that means what he has leaked -- was generally known to intelligence organizations around the world and all the uproar is is just part of the show.
we have 2 federal judges conflicting on Section 215 -- setting the stage for a SCOTUS decision
will NSA intelligence become admissible in court? no parallel detective work required to acquire evidence by legal means ? the "writ of assistance" noted in the 30c3 keynote?
i looked up "what is patentable",-- the wickedpedia essay states that the idea may not be abstract and must be non-obvious.
to me, for example, scanning a page to .pdf and then sending the .pdf via e/mail is an obvious use of 2 tools . how long did it take people to figure out they could print a page and then fax it ?
slide to unlock? how long have there been slide locks on barn doors? hmmmmm . any simple migration of an existing process to a computer program -- to me -- is "obvious". back in the Days of the Mainframe that's how we came up with all our COBOL programs .
oth, the math used in PGP to construct the public/private keys, I would say, is non-obvious. I read the description of how that is done and to me it was non-obvious.
in this, as in so many laws though, congress writes the laws, then we have a court case to establish precedent and then court tells us how they will enforce it. ( stare decisis.)