Unfortunately, it seems to be rampant on both sides of the aisle.
I'm pretty sure the US will if there is ever a successful French company.
I'm going to start with saying that I do not agree with the President or the way his administration is handling things.
Than I am going to go on to agreeing with some of it, but I'll at least try to explain.
There is something to be said about trying to keep media outlets and government officials from creating panic where there shouldn't be. Someone in a position of knowledge should have the chance to explain what they mean by something being "devastating" and we should be concerned about headlines when a seeming large portion of our population stops reading when the font gets smaller.
There is also something to be said about the economic impact of the virus causing more deaths than the virus itself at some point, and I think that is a complicated thing to balance. The President and this administration do not seem to handle "complicated" well, but that does not mean all of their decisions are poorly motivated.
Also, lock-picks have legitimate legal uses..and so does surveillance software.
Sure they lost millions of subscribers, but the stock price went up because of his masterful work cutting useless expenses (like employees, benefits, etc.). Investment thinking once again looks to the end of the quarter and does not really care about longevity.
But this continues to ignore telecom services that we pay (a lot) for and they have zero respect for their customers. Giving someone money does not give them incentive to treat you better, giving customers options and providing transparency about how you are actually being treated is incentive because your customers or audience can dry up if you are not doing a good job.
Plus, you know, yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater is not actually illegal.
The police officer posting it had no sense of it possibly being wrong or that people would consider it theft. This is one of (apparently) many police officers that are so out of touch with the people that they police that there was little thought given to the possibility that posting this would have people questioning why they did something. This police officer is literally the Sheriff of Nottingham and does not understand that what he is doing is theft. Unfortunately, the experience is probably teaching him not that taking money from a suspect that cannot be arrested is wrong, but it is probably teaching him not to tell anyone about it because the public is "hostile".
So I assume that the Internet is currently coming up with the list of all instances in which the city of Newark has posted anything that was actually wrong so they can go arrest themselves.
the central premise of its product is security umm...no it isn't. The central premise of their product is ease of use. They are just trying to hide the fact that it achieves this at the expense of security.
as it is not fixed in the sense needed for copyright Had they used Gorilla Tape, it would have been.
That begs the question as to whether or not it would be legal to fill a self-driving car with 10% Ethanol fuel. The car would be way over the limit.
Roku gets a cut of the subscriptions from content providers that have apps available on their devices. This is (most likely) a dispute about that amount.
Blood alcohol levels tested by a traditional breathalyzer get the alcohol from the air contact with the blood in the lungs. You have not inhaled anything (hopefully) and it will appear on the test. Alcohol directly injected with a needle will still show up (plus, the whole you being dead while driving will be a problem). Assuming their test is similar for THC, the method of ingestion would not matter. If their test is somehow testing residual in the lungs from inhalation, they are going to quickly run into experts in court that will be explaining their snake-oil is not going to produce any sort of accurate result.
“There is no capability to recognize or identify individuals and absolutely no plan”
Well, clearly since their other attempt yielded 0 success, I think the "no capability" part is probably accurate.
And it really is difficult to fathom the MTA having any sort of an actual plan for anything.
What they were able to find was a security camera attached to a house across the street that captured the crime that never happened
Probably a Ring camera purposely pointed at a place of worship using facial recognition to identify the people that go there.
Lomnitzer Law has followed suit and sued Malibu for breach of contract
I actually hope the court sides with Malibu. A law firm really should be more responsible for choosing it's clients wisely. How could anyone representing them not realize that Malibu would do this kind of thing the first opportunity they had?
How did they have standing to sue?
An AI generated the work and owns the copyright for it.
First, the creators need to then get the AI to somehow grant them a license to do anything with the work if they want to make a copy.
More importantly, doesn't the AI actually have to sue for copyright infringement? Does an AI have standing to sue in China? Did it really want to? How did it know about the legal system at all?
Re:
Actually, they can't. These were pulled by ContentID, so there was no copyright abuse. YouTube's automated system did not work correctly and pulled the videos, NBC and Disney likely did nothing wrong here, but this is the result of bad law, notice-and-takedown liability issues, and the likes of NBC and Disney pushing for this kind of stuff for decades.