Frankly I don't give a flying fuck about the quality of journalism is shitty these days.
If you can't be bothered to do a quick search for intellectual property on FUCKING WIKIPEDIA as a quick reference check, especially since it identifies copyright and patents as two completely separate types of IP in the last sentence of the first paragraph on the wikipage, then you deserve to literally be thrown out on your ass from any respectable news organization for such a blatantly obvious screw-up.
For a single news article, it's as simple as this
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=intellectual+property
Was that so hard?
*facepalms* Jesus AFP, do the fucking research before posting shit like this. What, did they not read the actual tweet? Did you fire all your high-quality journalists or something?
Still not sure if Dotcom was serious or trolling with the patent claim (which is so overly broad it's completely absurd), but he seems to be up to his old tricks: saying something outrageous and then watching the established media make a fool of themselves.
As somemone who's lost a close family friend to brain cancer, I'd be more than willing to let him off the hook. Provided he tells us everything he knows about the inner workings of Prenda Law (even as the fall guy, i doubt that they kept him completely in the dark.
$500 in his account and $50,000 in debt? Yeah, that sounds pretty accurate for a patient with brain cancer. Those brain-cancer treatments are mind-blowingly expensive, and a lot of them are still experimental.
Even if he's involved in a den of scam artists like Prenda "Law", nobody should have to suffer something as crippling as brain cancer.
Side-note: Can anybody find out know where the tumor is located on Brett's brain?
I honestly miss Jack Thompson.
The guy may have been an overzealous anti-video game crusader, but at least his "arguments" were slightly more realistic than some of the bizzaro claims made by today's anti-violent video game crowd.
How long is the video game industry going to put up with this bullshit?
As the Zen Master says, "We'll see."
Seriously, a bunch of teens getting CRIMINAL FUCKING RECORDS for throwing Water Balloons.
Hopefully the Raleigh Police don't realize that water is actually H2O, or else those teenagers could find themselves on a one-way trip to Guantanamo Bay for being "enemy combatants".
I can see it now:
Detainee: ...So, what are you in for?
Teenager: Throwing water balloons at my High school security officer.
Detainee: What, did you fill the balloons with acid or something?
Teenager: Nope, just plain water.
Detainee: And you're locked up here why?
Teen: Because the chemical compound of water is H2O.
Detainee: ... You have got to be fucking kidding me.
Hell I bet you couldn't be on any decent sized public university these days without hearding a "that's what she said" line at least once.
Stupid is sort of thing that the US DOJ does (see: MegaUpload case). I'm pretty sure the brainiacs at the Justice Department aren't so lobotomized that they would even consider going after an entire domain registrar.
Then again, with the current administration, who knows?
As the Zen Master says, "We'll see."
Pretty much this. If it's the LED is glowin' then it's clearly recordin'.
So yeah, the claim that you wouldn't be able to tell if someone is recording you or not with Glass is a load of bull*.
*Caveat: this statement does not cover the possibility of the person wearing Glass tampering with said device so that the LED doesn't light up.
Of course they're organized blue. They're all businesses! It's very hard (or at least extremely time-consuming) to operate a business without a minimum amount of organizational structure!
That being said, I think that this "IP Theft=Terrorism" bull is just a red herring for Holder to distract from the fact that a) he should have been fired a long time ago, b) he's completely incompetent, and c) he's trying to distract everyone from the whole AP records debacle.
And for the nth time, it's not IP theft. It's IP infringement! You can't steal a copyright, you infringe on a copyright. You can't steal a patent, you infringe on a patent. You can't steal a trademark, you infringe on a trademark.
However, you can steal trade secrets, but that usually falls under "corporate espionage". So while trade secrets are considered Intellectual Property, they're the only one of the four IP categories that is actually considered stealing.
The phrase IP Theft is misleading to the common man, because you turn around and go "copyrights/trademarks/patents are IP", which leads to people incorrectly believing that illegal downloads are considered stealing, when in fact it's actually infringement. There is a big difference.
The fact that the people at the DOJ don't understand this kind of important difference (or they do and keep parroting the "copyright infringement=theft" meme anyway) is rather disturbing.
Now the question is: will Rep. Watts try to get a bill through Congress effectively saying something "IP Theft is helpin teh terrorusts (including copyright in that definition since he supports Hollywood's interests), so we need to make it a a felony, and if you don't support this bill then you're with the terrorists!"?
As the Zen Master says, "We'll see."
I can already hear the Star Wars references being made.
So in the previous article I suggested (in a half-joking manner) that the Internet should consider crowdfunding the construction of a statue for Judge Wright to honor him for taking down Prenda.
I mentioned the idea over at Ars as well, and apparently someone over there has started a campaign on indiegogo for that very statue!
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-unofficial-otis-d-wright-ii-statue-fundraiser
I'd be pretty amused if this project actually met its goal, to be honest.
So, has there been any word on someone crowd-source funding a statue of the Honorable Judge Otis Wright made from [insert precious metal here] with a plaque saying:
Dear Honorable Judge Otis Wright:
You win ALL the Internets.
-Sincerely,
The Internet
This. If you're going to use something in a commercial venture, at least ask for permission from the owners first.
On a related note, since this is related to memes in general, I wonder how the whole Slenderman phenomenon factors into this. There's already an independent studio releasing a film named "Entity" into theaters this July that is basing itself on the Slenderman mythos, which makes me wonder: did they ask permission from the makers of Slender/Slenderman's creator to use Slenderman for their movie (doubt he'll be referred to as Slenderman, but it's hard not to instantly recognize tall, dark and faceless at this point.)?
Oddly enough, Macklemore/Ryan Lewis and Alice in Chains are both from Seattle.
And honestly, I can kinda understand the whole twitter aversion (Didn't see the point of it when it came out, still don't now). For popular bands these days, people love hearing constant updates about whatever the band members are doing this very second. Fact is, some people still have this belief that we don't need to get on the Internet bullhorn and shout out whatever is we're doing at the moment just because.
I think Sean's point is pretty much if Alice in Chains is going to let the world know what they're doing, they'll do it the old-fashioned way: with a old-fashioned press-release.
As for their complaints about how much their music is worth these days, considering on how their contract was probably written, they're probably getting under 10% of the income that their songs actually generate (the line from Macklemore's "Jimmy Iovine" popped into my head about "7 percent to split" and whatnot). And with the advent of the Internet, their already tiny slice of the revenue pie may have declined in the past decade or so due to brief lapses in popularity/Internet piracy/rewritten contracts with record labels. so I'm not surprised that Alice In Chains would be unhappy about the apparent worth of their music.
And much as you think that the days of record labels supporting artists is over, here's a little food for thought: Macklemore's singles are getting a lot of radio play in part to the fact that he hired out Time Warner's promotions department to help get his debut album out in the open (y'know, for all those unaware of the awesomeness that is Youtube/still listen to the radio).
The success of The Heist can be attributed to how the relationship between the record label and the artist should be. Not the "I sold my soul to the record label in order to make it to the big time" relationship, but a "I am the artist, the label's job is just to distribute my music on a per album basis".
Still, both groups make great music as far as I'm concerned.
uses Norton
Meh, Norton does an adequate job for a run-of-the-mill anti-virus program.
That said, I have SuperAntiSpyware and MalwareBytes installed and run them every so often just to go through my drives and make sure that Norton didn't miss anything.
But yeah, I burst out laughing when I read that McAfee was the ones patenting this thing. I mean, I don't know anyone in my circle of friends actually uses McAfee these days. It's kinda common knowledge now that it's a shitty anti-virus software.
And now that I think about it, if they implement this patent into their software, aren't they technically selling legal spyware instead of an anti-virus program?
The Ambassador probably specified Game of Thrones (which I've never seen myself) for his "infringement = stealing" rant/mantra is because it's the single-most pirated show to date, so he decided to hold it up as a prime example of his tired, horse-carcass of an argument.
It should be noted though that there are two types of infringement, a civil and a criminal version. I think the arguments trying to equate the criminal version with stealing, but it still fails because even then it's still two different crimes.
Oh, and this just makes the Ambassador look like more of a fool:
Show director David Petrarca said shows like Game of Thrones thrive on ?cultural buzz? and piracy, he suggested, helps to move that along. HBO programming president Michael Lombardo and actor Rose Leslie, who plays Ygritte in the show, both described piracy as a ?compliment?.
From the source:
In addition to the new barriers for public participation, Enbridge?s proposal won?t undergo an environmental assessment, also thanks to Bill C-38 which gutted environmental laws.
In all fairness, the FBI interviewed Tamerlan in 2011. Apparently lot can change in two years.
Re: House Judiciary investigating whether Holder lied under oath
And any American who was paying even a little attention to the shit that the DOJ's been pulling under Obama (continuing Fast and Furious, spying on journalists, playing Hollywood's rent-a-cop with the Megaupload fiasco/illegal seizure of Dotcom's servers, etc.) is going: "Wait, they're investigating this idiot now? He should've been kicked out a long time ago!"