This is like playing air guitar and it being out of tune.
At least they're still bothering to torture the law, facts, and basic rational thinking. How long before they won't feel the need to make even that minimal effort?
What's the use of talking about facts and reason when the country just elected a bunch of aholes who are almost completely impervious to facts and reason, and were obviously so? Why does the law matter when you have far more Kacsmaryks and Cannons? What about when SCOTUS itself doesn't care about facts and the law? The boding is getting terrifying.
4K TVs
If they used conspiracy laws against law enforcement the way they do drug dealers, a big percentage of judges, DAs/US Attorneys and cops would be in prison.
What good are standards or codes of ethics if they're not enforced? Why aren't there standards that involve multiple examples of ignoring really basic law and facts? Of course, we have a SCOTUS that would fail these routinely, and corrupt pols who are impervious to facts, and about a third of the country in a cult. Bad boding all around.
Are you actually trying to claim that a mallet isn't a hammer? Correct me if I'm wrong but I do believe that mallets, and gavels, are used to hammer on things. To me, and dictionaries [usage] and etymology and uh .... that kinda makes it a hammer.
Does the 1st A. even apply to worms?
"For all the whining about “indoctrination” of students with “liberal agendas,” state officials clearly aren’t opposed to indoctrinating kids. They just want to be the ones doing the indoctrinating" This sounds kinda familiar. One of the most prominent and enduring national myths is the one about the Puritans coming here to escape religious persecution. This is wrong, they had no problem with religious persecution, they just didn't want to be the ones getting persecuting. They immediately engaged in their 'puritanical' persecution so bad it gave us that word.
Bela Lugosi's dead
jesus, the whole article is about how and why it's wrong, just like articles disussing good rulings. Issn't that a little more 'interesting' than glib empty comments?
The oranges of this date back to my tykish years watching that show with the family sitting around a B&W TV. [Just to make this Trump-related]. Even more so by saying--orange ya glad I didn't try to tie it in to My Mother the Car? [god I'm old, and again I'm REALLY sorry....]
A little back-story should be discussed here. The officer is a fierce opponent of free speech and named his horse Moose as short for 'Ed Moose', the singular form of Ed Meese, the guy in Reagan's orbit even when he was gov of California and Meese was instrumental in the crackdown on protests at Berkley in 1969 where a student, not even a protester, was killed [reminds of Kent State and 4 dead in Ohio...]. So this was a case involving talking to the horse Mr. Ed [Moose]. [Sorry about all of this]
Phone manufacturers could end this BS by refusing to comply. Yes I know this is pie-in-the-sky crap but it's still true, imagine if you simply couldn't buy a phone in the EU, the ahole pols would end the insanity pretty quickly.
So can we start arresting cops when they assert qualified immunity?
Wow, this is monumentally obtuse. I wonder if the cops never seem to forget to turn the camera on when they're the ones getting abused? I wonder how often the cameras don't work then? Or the footage gets lost? And of course they make it just as easy to get a hold of the footage that makes them look bad as when a citizens is behaving badly, right? What a putz.
In these discussions you don't usually hear about cameras but I have a Sony RX10 MkIV that cost $1700 new that had these two tiny plastic parts break, they're concentric ring cams/switches that go around the shutter button, one is the on/off switch the other for zoom. They couldn't cost more than pennies to make but the cheapest I could find to get the camera fixed was about $500, $600 if I went with the Sony approved route. You had to replace the whole top assembly.
He didn't argue that conservatives were better people or that liberals only had two dimensions, they had all five, it was more about how they ranked the priorities of the 5. And, it was much more nuanced than that and it involved those with conservative and liberal mindsets, not really close to todays political split. He seemed to have a fair amount of data showing a very widespread cross-cultural divide though. BUT, I never could understand his conclusions considering the hallmarks of a conservative mindset related to it being authoritarian, Manichean with a real distrust/inability to handle ambiguity and uncertainty, distrust of the new and different/group think, all of which to me is the perfect recipe for delusional thinking. Kinda like what you would expect of religiosity, in other words, why conservatives are by far the most religious.
Wow, can't say I ever expected to see “A Canticle for Leibovitz” ref, great book I read near 50 years ago.
These are the works of Christian Nationalists, or 'White Christian Nationalists', except that's a qualifier that does virtually zero work. At the core of these mfers efforts is a basic denial of facts combined with profound racism. And a large percentage of the country is ready and willing to participate.