Oh, and apparently the paper was retracted because it was just bad:
Frontiers did not ?cave in to threats?; in fact, Frontiers received no threats.
... almost as bad as shutting down an entire journal because it published an article doubting global warming, right?
(I sincerely hope that Timmy starts defending IP soon; then I can just ignore him as a 100% idiot.)
Good, we might have some sanity as a result.
Given that experience of being sued by a company simply as result of introducing new laws to protect the health of its citizens...
Damn... I swear I hadn't read AC's comment when I wrote this.
Windows has viruses! Apple doesn't! So there!
Another non-problem, let's make noise about it. 50 people dead in eight freaking years? Seriously? What's next, the danger of drowning in bathtubs?
The whole point of the AC was that "control from London" is the opposite of free trade.
...even though there's no scientific evidence to support that specific amount of water for everyone to consume daily.
I thought you were supposed to see if he weighs as much as a duck...
Yes, let's give the government even more power to mess with the Internet! What could possibly go wrong?
(The concept of "regulatory capture" appears to be a difficult one for a lot of people.)
"... and that's clearly what European regulators are concerned with".
It doesn't matter. What you're saying is "but I like these guys". Either you like the Nanny State protecting idiots from themselves or you don't.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and then this: half of the people is dumber then the average.
If they get hit with a couple thousand charge-backs, won't that be really bad even for a company as big as NS?
Where's the report button on articles? I've about had it with Timmy's PC bullshit.
SO WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO START SHOOTING THEM?
Children?
When is that not the case?