Can't we just start another petition asking to make porn mandatory for 21+ year olds?
Let me guess, they're going to eliminate foreign spying before they do anything about domestic spying.
Who shortened the term to just "socking"? Simple "puppetry" says it all, and is more direct. I don't think anybody particularly cares whether or not it involves hosiery enough to be the defining characteristic.
Too bad you can't use your phone while driving.
Sure, they're just pretending, but the point is that EA's pretense is thinner than an iPad5.
I'm starting to think Americans are born in full tactics gear holding assault guns.
Only on Tuesdays.
Mom says it's nothing new. Govt always been spying.
...to attach sensors to people sleeping in order to collect real-time data for a million people.
Just what the NSA needs.
Mike actually said that it was surprising that he called it, not that they did it.
I have no problem paying about as much for gas as for milk, and the milk is subsidized. Gas is cheap.
It better look cool if it's going to make up for the horrible audio.
I don't see much similarity tho. The gulf wars were U.S. interest. Stopped the first because U.N. said so. So the U.S. lied to get U.N. sanction for the second.
Syria seems to be more of a U.N. ordeal not focused on U.S. interests. The U.S. doesn't have any reason to lie in order to invade.
I have 3 cellphones, 2 tablets, and gizmos that I don't even know what they are for...
...Ooh! Bunnies!
Point is that percentage of traffic is completely the wrong metric.
Part of my premise is that of "all the data transmitted on the Internet", most of it is public: such as typical videos.
My example even excluded the fact that said YouTube video is subject to thousands times more transmissions than the single transmission of an e-mail to a single recipient.
I was shooting for 200 bytes.
That means the U.S. said "Yes, Germany, we will help you improve your own domestic spying program, so we can exchange relevant information between our great nations."
Done with due process
"Basically, the DOJ is saying that it can make legal arguments that only the court can see, but which the tech companies suing it cannot see. That goes against every basic concept of due process."
Well, that just goes hand in hand with one of their reasons for blanket surveillance, that due process takes too long.