I wanted to read the source for "health benefits."
Well, "video games have health benefits for children", "benefits" links to an article citing only "video games can improve your health". Improve your health links to another trivial article citing only "video games that are supposed to improve your mental and physical health". Now, not only have we gone from an assertion of fact "do have benefits" and "can improve your health", we've fallen down to a mere "supposition." I suppose you know what they say about suppositions. Finally, "Mental and physical" links to http://www.beyond.com.au/. where the most meaningful science is found in the "Mythbusters 10-Year Anniversary" advertisement.
Please don't restate and overstatement of a supposition from a presumed source that is no longer linked. All tedium and no source makes Joey want to start cutting himself.
So, if they're targeting everyone 3 hops from a suspected terrorist, and Santa knows the location of Al Queda, then everyone who has received a present from Santa needs to be targeted. Santa is one big hop.
Well, if he's holding a hornets nest, then obviously the people are the hornets. Some may sting you and some may not. He claims it is hard to tell the bad hornets from the good hornets without more metadata. Alas, all he's doing is gripping the nest tighter and tighter, suffocating us all.
The corporation / worker model doesn't work; both players exist at a loss. A corporation cannot pay the worker more than it sells. A worker cannot pay the corporation more than he is paid. After taxes from every angle, there's nothing left to talk about.
Hated how popular news, and I thought the TD article, only mentioned if there's a possible connection to a possible terrorist. No, remember it's more like a possible connection to a possible connection to a possible connection to possible terrorist.
"...banning these nonlethal weapons leaves officers employed by schools with few options when the use of force is necessary."
That's nonsense implying a problem maintaining in the past when there were fewer weapons to choose from? Without getting in history, though, anybody working next to mental health is trained in takedowns. That includes 4'9" 105 lbs. females. Being unarmed rather places the majority of risk (still being, arguably, not much) on the staff members, which society should see as acceptible and noble, since staff risks themselves to protect the children.