Bill Gates. Seriously?
There goes any credibility he may have had right there, if the person he wants to talk to about Internet management is the guy who so famously did not understand the Internet that he blew the biggest example of First Mover Advantage that the world has ever seen and his company has still not recovered from it, 20 years later.
As I understand it, ex parte means that only one party to a dispute needs to be present. So what's wrong with an "ex parte accusation"? If I have a problem with Bob violating my rights, I don't need to haul Bob into court just to accuse him; that would, in fact, be completely backwards.
The restaurant may be their property, but my phone is my private property; what right does some building-owner have to unilaterally decide to violate my property rights just because he owns a building?
"There are no void areas if you do special trick XYZ" is simply not true. Try placing a traffic cone (which is approximately the size of a toddler) directly behind the center of your rear bumper, then get in the car and see how far forward you have to drive before you can see it in any way. You might be surprised. I know I was when we did that in driver's ed.
No children are going to be able to sneak up on you so you smush them when you back up.
I don't need to add forty-thousand dollars to the price of the vehicle for an in-car CCTV system which attempts badly to replace that.
FWIW, I've never bent a fender or bumper hitting anyone,
I'll just put you down as the average java programmer who thinks the jvm is everything you need to care about, and deal with your broken hardware when you call me to tell me it's "acting up" and you've not a clue what could possibly be wrong.
I wonder if these guys are aware that it is specifically a felony to knowingly infect someone with the HIV virus. (They really should, being specialists in HIV-related issues and all.)
Isn't threatening to commit a felony against someone a pretty serious crime in and of itself?
However, we under estimated the impact this would have on a small number of customers who use lights from other brands which could not be controlled by the Philips Hue software.
I am not saying that ISIS is not a legitimate threat to cause some damage
And while some implementations of zero rating may seem better than others (like T-Mobile's Binge On, which exempts all video from usage caps)
It's amusing to watch how so many of the people stridently calling for Mayor Emmanuel's resignation right now are the same ones who worked so hard to get him elected in the first place.
I say, let him stay in office and finish out his term. This is what you get, people of Chicago, for electing a politician with a long and well-documented history of corruption in the first place. Like the story of the farmer and the viper, you knew exactly what he was when you picked him up.
No, as a matter of fact, there is a difference between being objectively guilty and being found guilty by a court. Hopefully a mess like this will lead the DEA to clean up their act so more guilty people won't get away with it like this.
As I pointed out earlier, he apparently does not know what a void area is.
As this concept is explained in driver's ed, it's at least somewhat reasonable to conclude that tqk does not, in fact, know how to drive, and therefore his opinions on the subject are not backed by any actual experience and can be safely discounted.
Precisely. Unlike some people in here who make a big deal of proclaiming their undying hatred for the film industry and swearing up and down that they'll never watch another mainstream movie again whenever any article about the MPAA's misdeeds gets posted, I actually enjoy going to the movies. I have for years, for longer than smartphones have been a thing, and I've never once actually seen the mythical "disruptive cellphone yakker" that everyone loves to wring their hands about. That sort of thing could almost lead one to believe that he doesn't exist. A very few times, I've noticed someone texting during a movie, but... so what? How does that interfere with my viewing experience? The screen is up and he's holding his phone down, so it's I'm not even looking at it. Why should I even care?
Wow. Who names their son "sun"? :P
Sensors and cameras are the best invention ever to help keep the paint and body business busy!
So they came out with the camera...no more dents at the back...started repairing the fenders. Watching the backup up camera and forgot to watch the front end swinging into something.
How many mass shootings have you experienced in person lately? I've never been anywhere near one, nor do I know anyone who has.
...says the guy who apparently doesn't know what a void area is, or how many children small enough that they literally cannot be seen in a rearview mirror get hurt every year because of them. Backup cameras aren't about convenience or laziness or "not having to learn to use mirrors"; they're a basic safety feature for a very specific and very real use case. Mirrors are great for driving forward, but horrible for driving in reverse.
Yes, I know, but that was a deliberately simplified post for the benefit of people without a background in computer science and complexity theory. :P
Remember when they complained about how disruptive the horseless carriage was to ordinary, decent horse-drawn traffic?
Yeah, me neither. Everyone who said that is long dead now, and so is the concept of horse-drawn traffic in modern cities. This simple point is worth keeping in mind for people who complain about cell phones being disruptive.
Well, there are NP-complete problems and NP-hard problems. NP-complete means (simplified version) that it's very difficult to compute, but easy to verify the right answer once you see it. Factorization belongs to this category: once you have the factors, it's simple arithmetic to verify that they are indeed the factors of the number in question.
The Traveling Salesman problem, on the other hand, is not easy to verify. It asks which permutation of possible routes the salesman may take is the fastest, and this necessarily requires you to compute every possible permutation of routes (or at least a significant percentage of them, if you're clever enough to find a way to prove some of them can be pruned early) and then see which of them is the shortest. A problem that's very difficult to both compute and verify is called NP-hard, and they're significantly worse than ordinary NP-complete problems.
You spelled "virtuous" wrong.