From what I've read in this article, the lawsuit is against Turkey itself, since it was their representative that the security was "protecting".
As Leonard French has said, "Don't be a Liebowitz."
No, you only pay lip-service to the 1st amendmentThis reminds me of the scripture "They draw near me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me." In other words, he only says he likes the first amendment, but twists its definition to suit his purposes.
Nah, the lowly developers can be fired and hired with impunity. Why are they called Human Resources if we weren't meant to strip-mine them?
One good thing I like about macOS is that it can mount ISOs, .toasts, and .DMGs.
I still have Daemon Tools: macOS doesn't handle the more proprietary formats.
How far we have come.No, it's how far we have fallen.
Government regulatory and licensing powers, like any tool, can be used, misused, and abused. This is clearly in the second or third area for it to be "Drone operators will steal our business of surveying, even if they're just offering pictures."
Misdemeanor? Nah, felony all along the way. Gotta get that disenfranchisement for undesirables in somehow.
Profits from loot boxes goes to the upper management, not the lowly developers.
What makes you think they haven't? If there was anything meriting an arrest, it would have been brought up. Either they were smart enough to wear masks to prevent identification and were smart enough to not record their "rioting", or there was nothing that was actionable.
Minor correction: The binary version would be 1,073,741,824, not 1,024,000,000.
Or the system saw an ISP sending a lot of messages and flagged the ISP as a potential bot farm.
Either A. Reply to your previous comment, or B. Put them all in one big post. Don't separate it out into separate threads. And I prefer B. It's less spammy that way.
It's constant topic here in your attacks on copyright, patents, trademarks, and DMCA.Remember that the Constitution of the United States of America, the highest law of the land, has said Congress may enact such laws, not that they must. Also, it must be for the benefit of the arts and science. If the law starts harming innovation and media, something is wrong. Maybe the existing laws need to be re-written or abolished entirely.
Boo hoo. -- If your "job" involves finding suchNice line break.
then you're probably malicious / pirate.
DMCA works fine for everyone honest. Only pirates hate it.Nope. A lot of content creators on YouTube have had their livelihoods taken away by fraudulent DMCA notices. TotalBiscuit, the Cynical Brit, had a couple of strikes by Sega Japan against his Shining Force videos because Sega Japan went on a DMCA spree to drum up search rankings on the sequel Shining Ark. Yes, this is abuse of DMCA. Yes, his channel was affected. And it wasn't just his channel.
do you want Airbus to allow Chinee knock-off parts on their assemblies of already multi-sourced death traps?If they work (both in stress tests and as replacements), I see no issue. Things go wrong when testing starts being skipped or ignored.
You DO NOT "own" the content on a DVD or book.No, but you do own the physical item itself. If you cut out all the words of a book and paste them together randomly on a poster, is that copyright infringement? Can the author or publisher go after the person who bought the book for misuse of their product (and remember: books can be resold, so the original buyer might not have been the one to cut it up)? What about showing someone else a picture in a magazine: are you infringing on copyright by showing someone who didn't buy the magazine the picture? If not, why not?
And people are complaining about Biden being pro-PRC. Through inaction, Trump has given Hong Kong to China. Xi will be calling his buddy Trump after this is over and congratulating him on distracting the world so that Communist China could take over Hong Kong.
What was Popehat's comments on goat fornicators again? Ah yes…
The Rule of Goats: even if you say you're only fucking goats ironically, you're still a goatfucker
And how quickly would one person who went around killing police officers last? I guarantee that, unless the police are that hated by the public, the public would assist the police in tracking down any mass murderer, even if that murderer was a cop killer. What about a group of people? Or even a city? I think the answer is that if it went that far, the military would end up getting involved to quell the uprising.
But it made some people feel like retribution was done. Just a reminder to everyone: Vengeance isn't justice.
There are better ways of saying "I don't agree with you because of this fact and/or statement" than insulting people. And I agree: Cuties does not look like a cute coming of age story. SidAlpha even said that the main character isn't a good person: her actions could have killed a fellow student/young girl; she steals her cousin's phone and watches porn on it; when found out, she tries to do a striptease and, when rebuffed, retaliated by taking pictures of her nude crotch and sending it out on social media. That said, badmouthing a writer on the site, and doing it in an insulting way, will turn people against you, not the author.
It's a power thing. Police have a lot of power over citizens. Currently, citizens have little power over police. People in power tend to abuse that power. Citizens have little power to abuse.
The entire leadership of Activision-Blizzard need to resign without the golden parachute: They should have enough money to not need that parachute.
Bobby Kotick either inherited the problem or caused it. Either way, he should have stopped this but he didn't.