Can't see a good reason why it couldn't just appear over at Wikileaks. Attach the Panetta review for good measure.
4 Years? He'll be impeached for something stupid he does well before that.
Looks to me that he's draining the swamp into the White House...
Prince is dead. There can be no further creative works from him, so there is no further need for incentives for Prince. Copyright held by individuals should expire with the artist. Tidal should be free to stream this, as should anyone else.
Life + 50/70 years is complete nonsense.
Trump isn't a patch on Boris Johnson for buffoonery - by comparison, Trump is just a bigot and an idiot.
Unfortunately, it's a "post-truth" populist revolt. This idea that facts and truth don't matter as long as you get results is going to live as long as it's first disaster. Not sure if that is Brexit or Trump.
The idea that Donald Trump will do anything for the economy except granting large corporations more rent seeking opportunities ought to have been apparent to anyone that showed the slightest interest in his history.
Donald Trump's entire career has been predicated on inheriting a vast empire and he hasn't the imagination to conceive of anything else.
Apparently, there are also questions as to whether the accusers are real people.
Registering copyright works always was a no-brainer - but that is not the issue here. It's registering a DMCA agent.
Copyright cultists managed to change the law from registered works only to "everything" years ago - because they don't care about workable solutions and think they can profit by it. Probably their hands guiding this idiocy as well.
I suspect a BETTER idea would be to get Congress to apply that solution to DMCA registration:
- No idiots at the copyright office screwing things up
- No-on loses safe harbour
Next he'll be running for president. Does he grope women too?
...using a ruler graded in centimetres instead of inches
Very likely to be in violation of EU data protection laws - which will have a Irish variant.
People that buy Buggatti's?
Thing is, marginal cost of a Buggatti is 5 mil? Of a Movie? 0.
Where I come from, the first four letters are an acronym for ****ed In The Head.
I fail to see why an artists derivative works "licensing" their other creative works after they are dead offers anything of value to society at all. It's simply an argument that "someone should be paid".
It's called nano-piracy because it's a nano-problem
Pretty sure Charter don't want the same deal as Google - that would entail them providing meaningful broadband. They don't want to do that hence the tantrums.
Any law that places criminal determination on the subjective opinion of a third party being offended is problematic. It is impossible to abide by the law other than foregoing speech altogether. It is also the perfect weapon to return fire on the idiots who created it.
The USPTO only consider it prior art if there is already a patent on it. So yes, they would NOT consider the wheel having prior art.
Of course, you can find that design on this very page at techdirt...
[MAIN] [SUBMIT A STORY] [RSS]
[IMAGE - Patents]
Isn't that a question to ask the electorate? No one seems to have any illusions as to what sort of person is and how he behaves - does the US really want a person like this as president?