Only it didn't work, at least not how the MAFIAA wanted it to.
For them, "working" would be letting them voice their misguided, unsupported views without having to worry about interference or the other side questioning them and resenting actual facts. In that sense, IRC definitely didn't - and couldn't - work.
You're right, congress members aren't Obama's cronies.
Both congress and Obama are the corporations' cronies.
But how can I /make/ a $100 million movie and have a profit on it? That's the problem with your new /business/ model /idea/.
I never thought I'd miss OOTB...
"...they know where to find the information they need and how to implement what they find."
"There is a need for a standardized something to put on ones resume in order to get an interview..."
Of course the entertainment industry won't stop claiming that Google profits off of copyright infringement, but that doesn't mean that they won't use this evidence to say, "See? Even Google dropped Megaupload because they are such a den of piracy! Clearly this proves their guilt!"
Looks like Jay's argument was...
*puts on sunglasses*
Dead on arrival.
If we don't abandon all of our civil rights, the pirates and terrorists have WON!
Mike, have you emailed him or linked him a copy of the article? I'd be interested to see what (if anything) he has to say about this.
The article didn't make it clear whether the item was cosmetic or practical in-game, but as a video game player I find it extremely objectionable to give people a pay-to-win advantage.
(I put all the blame with the developer in these situations, as I can relate to people who would rather buy an item than grind for hours to unlock it).
Damn, I was hoping for an article about Team Fortress 2 Hats...
Sure, this open source business model may work for a developer with half a million dollars to burn and a passion for free software, but it would never work for a patent troll who can't innovate his way out of a wet paper bag (patent pending)!
I can see them getting sued for violating quite a few vaguely-worded, unused patents with this plan.
What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.
Were you here back in 2008 or so when angry dude weird harold trolled Techdirt? Those were the days...
Just like how it's illegal to violate copyrights and therefore there are no people violating copyrights?
Why has no one compared this to the idea of a sit-in? In the same way that a sit-in overloads normal operating procedures to inhibit business as a form of protest, this block emails from coming in (albeit unintentionally). The way I see it, this is just another form of protest.
Also, I remember a post that was probably on techdirt, but maybe not, that compared DDoS attacks to digital sit-ins.
All I've ever heard of Hegel was his Dialectic...something about the thesis/antithesis-synthesis...
"...promise the ones who settle quickly a cut of what they can get from the others."
It's like a Macon's Bill #2 from Hell...
Re: Re: Re:
One more time, with feeling: