There's an obvious joke to be made here... but I just can't put my finger on it...
Look at all this data we collected, it's stopped so many (of our own) terrorist plots! Oh, you want to cut our funding, maybe next time one of the (our) plots might go through... IWe dare you to call our Bluff [dale]
In essence he was saying "100% of people I talk to agree with me, those that don't agree are crazy and/or unfit to be taken seriuosly."
Can I start using that?
they'll be using pocket battleships floating in the pools for defense. Might give a whole new meaning to the Splash zone
I might just be overly cynical, but when the only proof is "I saw it", with no other ways to validate I'm a bit wary to believe it. Again, most of his claims have been proven (directly or indirectly), but it's the "Oh yeah I alos found this..." that kinda gets to me...
it's not cowardly to be passive when your "advesary" has all the information on you and your weak-spots while you have little to no information on them...
Am I the only one that is starting to somewhat doubt Snowden*? Not saying hes a hack and a liar, but it seems every time I blink he's saying "oh look at what else I had done!" and other things essentially coming out to "Look hows smarts I am, the NSA == big stinky dumbos!"
I know a good portion of the things he released and said has turned out to be true... but the seed of doubt is planted in my mind. It's almost like a fisherman who caught a huge fish, but after retelling it he starts bragging about a slightly bigger and bigger fish.
(*note: I am not sayings it's all BS just starting to seem a bit exagerated [maybe, not sure])
Syria was using a central 5 year old Belkin router for their internets... turns out that it wasn't even a hack, just cheapness
At what point does screwing over the public cease to be enough excitement?
ah but using a brick/hammer leaves them open to a claim... however, if they hold the person and their phone "mysteriously/randomly" happens to be bricked about 5-20 minutes after being released then there is no proof as to what happened
"he's not technically a "lobbyist" -- he just happens to work for an organization where the main function is lobbying, and where most of his colleagues are lobbyists."
However, the government says the following:
"he's technically a "Terrorist" -- he just happens to work for an organization where the main function is terrorist, and where most of his colleagues are terrorists. And also because we said so"
Maybe this was one of those FBI funded plots (with the DEA's help so the FBI can keep their hands "clean") that fell through the cracks? (I mean it only cost $1M over 20 years... can't even buy a congress seat with that type of money) Imagine if the FBI had uncovered a plot that revealed so much personal inforation about people, that could have been shared with terrorists! People would of been so happy, and the gov. would have doubled their funding yearly for the next 100 years
Think of the children!!!
Clearly the fact that so much abuse happens justifies more access for the NSA to "monitor" "productivity of the workforce, both public and private. I mean the economy is vital and therefore being unproductive makes you a terrorist.
(posted from work, I must be a terrorist)
this turnover (at least at this mine, and others that I know of) happens at all levels, from miners, to IT, to accountants and even to upper management onsite.
Could become like the mining industry, at least in Northern Quebec. We hire someone out of college/technical school, they work here for 2-3 years to get experience and leave for another mining company/project. Likewise, every once in a while we see an experienced employee come in with some experience, gets hired nad works for a few years and moves on. Seems to me that an average mine worker will woek 2-5 years for a specific mining comapny/project before moving on to new things. Since there is so much turn around in the mining sector, most mines are pretty friendly with each other and will cooperate on certain things together (mine rescue being the major case). Just the other day we needed to find a specific system to fullfill our needs, so we called about 5 other nearby mines (all "competitors") asking what systems they have in place and doing a comparison. Seems like this would be a good idea for tech companies.
If this was a dry-run for a terrorist attack why would they leave a clue that they were there and successful? Mind you I'm not a terrorist (That's exactly what a terrorist would say!!) but I'm pretty sure that letting authorities know you found a weakness is counter productive...
I wonder who it was that changed big pharma's motto from being all about patients to being all about patents. Maybe it was a case of a typo and no-one bothered to fix it?
usually a nice photographer advises the couple of this and may actually make them sign a waiver to eliminate all potential mis-understandings and such
according to some arguements here, sure the monkey stole the camera, but now the photographer stole the image from that monkey... the monkey should sue him for IP theft
Re: Re: Layers, like an onion
agreed that even without telling potential attackers your layout you can and will eventually be attakced. However, what is the point of giving them a head start? If it takes them an extra week or to to figure out what holes you may or may not have, thats an extra week for the security team to detect an intrusion. It's the same thing as a chain linked fence around a secret complex, it's a delaying tactic that hopefully lasts just long enough for a routine check (patroling etc) to detect the attack