unnamed_1 's Techdirt Comments

Latest Comments (74)

• On the post: New Documents Raise More Questions About Safety Of TSA Scanners

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 30 Jun, 2011 @ 12:44pm

  Re: Re: Re:

  Right. Senators and other "special people" don't go through scanning.

• On the post: Righthaven's Biggest Fan Copies Content As Part Of His Argument Against Copying Content

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 20 Jun, 2011 @ 01:28pm

  Who do I see about buying the right to sue?

• On the post: Peanuts Rights Holder Shuts Down Peanutweeter, Pisses Off Fans For No Reason At All

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 20 Jun, 2011 @ 11:04am

  Re: Re:

  You sir will be hearing from Sam Jackson's lawyers for your blatant trademark infringement.

• On the post: You Can't Sue Google If You Get Hit By A Car While Following Google Walking Directions

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 17 Jun, 2011 @ 03:17pm

  Sheesh. She checked the Google satellite view and didn't see any cars.

• On the post: Investors Speaking Up About Patents Harming Innovation

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 08 Jun, 2011 @ 04:51pm

  Re:

  Now we just need to define "useful"

• On the post: Senators Want To Put People In Jail For Embedding YouTube Videos

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 01 Jun, 2011 @ 11:53am

  Coming this fall to Fox
  
  Cops: MPAA Edition

• On the post: Congress Folds: Extends Controversial & Likely Abused PATRIOT Act Provisions For 4 More Years

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 27 May, 2011 @ 10:29am

  Re: Re: My plaintive plea...

  I think the first step is to make the members of the party pay for the primary election. We'll see how many truly need a party if they have to kick in $50 bucks an election.

• On the post: Did Less Than 10% Of Access Copyright's Income Go To Authors Last Year?

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 27 May, 2011 @ 10:10am

  Re: Sure sounds profitable for a non profit

  Sheesh. Who uses overheads anymore?

• On the post: Senators Reveal That Feds Have Secretly Reinterpreted The PATRIOT Act

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 26 May, 2011 @ 01:10pm

  Re: Re: Re:

  But I'm from Oregon. Is it ok to vote for Wyden?

• On the post: Senator Leahy Supports Bringing Drugs In From Canada… And Also Banning Such Sites From The Internet

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 25 May, 2011 @ 01:10pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: realpolitik

  I would prefer a longer 1 term rather than 2 terms. As it is now they spend their entire first term trying to get a second term rather than actually doing anything.
  
  I agree with the salary thing. They shouldn't get a pension either. It was designed as a part time job. Let's get back to that.

• On the post: Disney's Anthony Accardo: The Tech Community Owes Content Creators A Living

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 23 May, 2011 @ 04:21pm

  Re:

  Disney does police content through their Homeland Security arm. So are "tech giants" now going to be forced to fondle people at the airport?

• On the post: Being Concerned With Free Speech Implications Of PROTECT IP Does Not Mean You Think You're Above The Law

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 20 May, 2011 @ 04:34pm

  As a legitimate company, Google has a responsibility to not benefit from criminal activity.
  
  Well since "piracy" also leads to sales I would hope that the *AAs would reject those sales and return that cash so they don't benefit from this criminal activity.

• On the post: Bezos: Attempts To Collect State Sales Tax On Amazon Sales Is Unconstitutional

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 19 May, 2011 @ 01:09pm

  Re:

  What about the other side of the coin? Do brick stores charge you sales tax based on where you live rather then where the store is located?
  
  To be fair maybe they should charge and pay sales tax to the state where the company is headquartered rather than to all 50 states.
  
  Oregon would gladly welcome all the companies that want to take advantage of our 0% sales tax by bringing in the jobs.

• On the post: 4th Amendment? What 4th Amendment? Supremes Say Police Can Create Conditions To Enter Home Without A Warrant

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 17 May, 2011 @ 04:49pm

  Re: Re:

  Didn't we see earlier this week a ruling that resisting an illegal entry into your home by the cops was itself illegal

• On the post: DOJ Uses Congressional Hearings About Protecting Mobile Privacy To Suggest Mobile Users Deserve Less Privacy

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 11 May, 2011 @ 10:36am

  Re: Re: Another post about a sacred right

  Maybe because the government is ignoring the whole "get a warrant" part lately?

• On the post: The Info Law Enforcement Gets When They Subpoena Facebook

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 05 May, 2011 @ 11:36am

  Re:

  If law enforcement wanted that, my webmail account is just as private.
  
  Except for their position that anything in your email that is over 180 days old they don't need a warrant to access.

• On the post: Apple Takes Credit For 'Uncovering' Its Patented Location 'Bug' That Isn't Really Tracking You, But Which It'll Fix

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 28 Apr, 2011 @ 03:14pm

  Filing patent application for infinite loop bug now. Cha-Ching.

• On the post: White House Threatens Blog For Accurately Using White House Logo

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 27 Apr, 2011 @ 04:57pm

  The White House also mentioned the "proximity to advertising," suggesting they were afraid that it would be seen as being associated with the White House.
  
  Dammit this administration was bought and paid for by Pepsi, not Coke. Call the lawyers.

• On the post: Obama Says It's Okay To Treat Manning The Way He's Been Treated Because He 'Broke The Law'

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 25 Apr, 2011 @ 02:44pm

  Now, the folks who posted this are taking the biggest issue with Obama's statement of "he broke the law," pointing out that he hasn't been convicted of breaking any laws. I actually don't find that to be all that problematic.
  
  Since as President he is the CNC of the military I believe that's called unlawful command influence.

• On the post: Winklevoss Twins Told To Accept The Millions Facebook Has Already Given Them And To Stop Complaining

  

  unnamed_1 ( profile ), 11 Apr, 2011 @ 04:45pm

  Oh how I want to hear a judge say: "Ok settlement thrown out. We find for Facebook, you collect $0. Should have taken the win. Goodbye"

Next >>