That's NOTHING. You should check out 17 U.S. CODE ? 501
I'll quote the very first bit to you.
(a) Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122 or of the author as provided in section 106A (a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the United States in violation of section 602, is an infringer of the copyright or right of the author, as the case may be.
Here's a helpful little primer to help you understand the difference.
I am told Pearson education actually bought a license to put it in one of their copyright textbooks.
http://torrentfreak.com/copyright-infringement-and-theft-%e2%80%93-the-difference-110827/
We've been a bit twitchy about terrorist plotting - even for a laugh - since 7/7/2005.
gotta love the internet.
Couldn't find a link myself, until I found a comment I'd made on Falkvinge's blog 18months ago with the link in it :-)
http://www.zdnet.com/surveillance-straw-petitioned-on-commerce-bill-controversy-3002073974/
I read and commented on the popehat story, but just now I finally remembered why Shelby County sounded so familiar.
Voting Rights Act.
Now it all kinda makes sense.
the exception for naming the driver of a vehicle went to the european courts in ~98. they said you had no right to silence or protection from self-incrimination then.
Then RIPA came in, and they can demand the password for any crime, failure is 2 years. for terrorism its 5. So one of the first things people did when it passed, was commit a minor crime, write a file about it, then encrypted it and sent it to the Home Secretary (or maybe the deputy PM, I forget which) then told the police that politician had evidence of a crime.
As you might expect, plod didn't really care, because of who it was (this was before plebegate) but it might be something people will try again.
I think the problem is we're looking at two different meanings of transparent
We look at it as meaning 'you can look through it'
They look at it as meaning 'you can't see it at all'
Says who?
You certainly can, just its cheaper (in time and materials) to buy it in.
oh, and I forgot that some of those conversion kits, are open source (Such as https://www.inventables.com/technologies/desktop-cnc-mill-kit-shapeoko-2)
Lets see how well they get stopped, eh?
I used to machine (many years ago I was a robotics guy ,was even one of the tech advisers/safety inspectors on BattleBots), and I'll tell you one thing about modern machining. The low-end stuff today, is worse than the low-end stuff from the 40s.
Second, 90% of all mills and lathes come from China.
Third - there are a NUMBER of conversion kits, to turn regular mills and lathes into CNC machines, and has been for a long time. I remember the battleBot builder association SORC buying and installing a conversion kit in 1999.
Fourth -mills and lathes and CNC machines are not that complex. In fact they're a lot simpler than atomic weapons to construct. So, if you're worried about constructing a bomb, and don't want them to do it, trying to den them a much simpler tool used for it, aint going to work. Especially not when there are even open source kits out there. After all, how well did the Ban on CNC machines hamper the Manhattan project? (I know the ban was temporal, in that they hadn't been invented at that point, but the US made them without needing a CNC)
What good cops?
Good cops don't allow bad cops to continue. Good cops don't shield misconduct behind 'the thin blue line'. Good cops should be actively policing themselves, and getting the bad ones out.
How often are you seeing that?
Not very often?
Not many good cops then are there?
There are potentials for effectively acting otherwise than in the best interests of the client when a layer accepts money from a third party. Thus the referenced rules make it clear that such things are to be done with the clients informed consent, and with the people funding being unable to direct the litigation, or obtaining information that's privileged.
Not going to be too hard to prove there were no professional standards violations.
Actually, good rhyme, but slightly off.
Patel owns two gas stations, which have wifi. the alleged actions took place on one of those IIRC. (its been ~9 months. Was in the motion to set aside the default)
It was a kinda emotional day. I had major butterflies in my stomach and I barely said a word the entire hearing. Also the computer Blair was using to display documents to the court was running Ubuntu, not Windows, so he was flustered by the switch as well.
The UK Pirate Party used Reddit to formulate their 2012 Manifesto. It has also used online voting for internal elections, including all the executive positions (which ended this past weekend http://www.pirateparty.org.uk/press/releases/2013/dec/16/new-pirate-leadership-team-takes-aim-2014/)
That will take some balls.
Judge O'Kelley's held his judgeship since 1970 (appointed by Nixon) and was Chief Justice until he retired (and took senior status) in 96.
I don't think that would wash. I think he's actually one of the longest serving federal judges (I think 3 longest currently, and 15th overall)
Indeed, just ask Bill S. Preston...
As a former Robotics engineer what's so alarming about Google's foray?
So, should we call manufacturing 'craftsman theft'?
How about printing 'scribe theft'?
If you're going to make up terms, don't forget to apply them to the exact same situations in history.
Re:
is that code dating from before the mis-70s? if so, then it's been superceeded by federal ones. Sorry, try again.
You forgot to mention Golan also established it's not property