Even if you think "Apple island's" rates are too high, at least they don't try to destroy your business
Gmail is the preferred Internet service provider of terrorists worldwide
TeqDert is my favorite blog!
Don't forget that there is massive power asymmetry at work. Facebook (and advertisers) isn't going to kidnap you and send you to a secret prison and torque you for years because of flaw/oversight/oops in their database mining. The government, on the other hand, can totally do that.
The computer game industry is whining about the same problem these days.
entitled.i.am
"[T]he NSA does not voyeuristically pore through U.S. citizens' e-mails. I stand by that."
Does it strike anyone else that he's saying we do read your emails, we just don't derive sexual gratification from doing so?
I'm only 2 paragraphs into the article and I can already see that Tim is low balling it. There's so much more in there that wasn't even covered. But I guess you can't spend pages and pages ripping it apart...
Impressive troll is impressive. MacArthur really hits all the "high" points from neutral search to Google not having any cost to likening Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Eric Schmidt to Hearst.
I'm only 2 paragraphs into the article and I can already see that Tim is low balling it. There's so much more in there that wasn't even covered. But I guess you can't spend pages and pages ripping it apart...
Impressive troll is impressive. MacArthur really hits all the "high" points from neutral search to Google not having any cost to likening Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Eric Schmidt to Hearst.
While I do think that using HIV is not in the best taste, I do think the analogy with STDs is a good one. Your shitty password on Facebook makes it more likely that scammers will gain access to more of my private information. That puts me in more danger and, in turn, makes it more likely that I will be scammed.
Then again, the analogy only makes sense if everyone is having sex with everyone else.
As a Bayesian, I have to point out that not only does our mind have a problem with probability but it's also not trivial to even define what one means by a statement like "Obama has a 85% chance of winning". For spinning coins, we can define the probability of heads by the frequency of heads in an ever-increasing number of coin spins. But the 2012 presidential is a non-repeatable event and all that breaks down.
I'm actually rooting for total mutually assured destruction.
I like that you call the world wide web a discovery and not an invention. :) I can totally see Tim Berners-Lee digging up the first ever seen chunk of world wide webinum.
The very title of the article already shows a lack of understanding about some of the issues with genetic information. Your genome is not just your genome. It also makes up a large part of the genome of your parents and your siblings and your children. You might be ok with doing whatever with your own genome today but your brother or your children and their children are going to have different considerations.
"People like me used to be auteurs... Now I'm supposed to beg for attention. It's completely counterintuitive to why I became a musician in the first place and the personality of someone like me."
I'm sorry Billy Corgan, I totally didn't hear you there. I was too busy watching stuff on Hulu, listening to music at Spotify, planning my next gathering at MeetUp, reading interesting articles on PLoS, posting on Facebook, and learning things at the Khan Academy. Please whine at me more about having to beg for attention, these headphone are just so I can hear you better.
This is all that went through my head when I read this:
Record producer: Wow, your song at open mic night was great. I think you have real potential. I'd like to sign you to my label.
Starving artist: Nah man, I want to be know for my music and not because I got lucky that some hot-shot producer saw me perform.
Record producer: ...
I think this captures my feelings accurately:
http://t.co/LR7Xio1r
This "more information = more better" fetish has gotten a little over the top. More information isn't helping the NSA find terrorist; it's making it harder! What we need is more knowledge and converting information into knowledge is pretty hard, and especially hard in medicine.