It seems to me what he's saying is "Maybe the Cooper of AF is the caretaker, maybe he's somebody else, I personally have no clue."
Before, they specifically said that the Alan Cooper who turned up in court, the one who was a caretaker, WAS NOT the Cooper in charge of their company.Wait, when did they say this?
I can already hear your liver screaming in agony.
I... Are you suggesting that Ken White takes orders from Mike?
Wait, I thought Ken said he wasn't going to use his computer during the hearing, since judges tend not to like it.
It's surprising how many of the people involved in this are willing to work for free.
Lutz could say that the only contact info he has for Cooper is a phone number, and that Cooper simply isn't answering his phone or responding to messages left on his answering machine. Of course, if he said that, the judge would want to know the phone number, would be able to determine the address the phone number belonged to, and from there...
If he wanted the Cooper issue to permanently go away, he could do a variation on the above: the only contact info he had for Cooper was his phone number, and that number was on his smartphone. Except that, oops, his smartphone got damaged to the point of destruction (or got stolen), and double oops, he never synced up his smartphone with his computer. So sorry, your honor, but Cooper is now and forevermore unserviceable.
Of course, the second would certainly get him contempt of court, but if the alternative is worse...
I would think that this would piss off the actual copyright holders, so why aren't they doing anything about it? Are they not aware of it?
By default, BitTorrent trackers record the source IP address from the request as the actual address of the peer to be delivered to others. But, some BitTorrent tracker implementations support an optional extension to the peer request message that allows requesting clients to specify a different IP address that the tracker should record in its list of peers instead. This is intended to provide support for proxy servers and peers/trackers behind the same NAT.That isn't spoofing a TCP connection.
IP addresses can be spoofed.How? From what I know of TCP/IP and the anti-spoofing measures used nowadays, spoofing a TCP connection would require incredible luck.
in which Barbara Streisand sued a photographer for taking an aerial photograph of her house, as part of a project to photograph the entire California coastline from a helicopter (to study the impact of erosion). It was crazy to think of that as a privacy violation, and the court clearly agreed, siding with the photographer over Streisand.Wasn't Streisand's issue that her house was labelled as being her house, rather than it being anonymous like all the other photos?
as well as your shots at Mike regarding his defense of Google (which purposefully ignores the numerous articles directly criticizing Google and actions undertaken by them).Silly, it's the fact that he defends Google at all that's the problem. </sarcasm>
They make money when people search for illegal versions of content via site hits AND they make money off the ads on the pirate sites.So, what is Google supposed to do? Try to guess which searches are looking for pirate sites, and refuse to do those searches?
The point is how much does Google make off of selling ads that are in some way connected to piracy attempts.Okay, then, how much? Do you have any estimates?
But now, when faced with the potential to say something on behalf of the artist to defend this pro-publicity gambit, you don't hesitate to go negative on the artists. Whammo. Even asking for attribution is being greedy and selfish.But the artist didn't merely ask. If he'd just asked for attribution, I doubt that Tim would have cared. Instead, he:
And yet there you were grousing and complaining when Slashdot was grabbing your stories without attribution. Sheesh.Did he threaten to sue Slashdot, or threaten to get their ISP to yank their connection? If not, I don't see how they're comparable.
So, if this sort of thing turns out to work, would it mean that if one country accepts the patent, the other has to accept it as well? Or does it go further, so if Mexico, the U.S. and Canada all decline to grant a patent, does the company get to sue all three countries to force them to accept the patent?
1) Games which haven't been rated? If those don't suffer from the tax, wouldn't it be an incentive to leave games unrated?
2) Freeware and open source games? Do they ignore the tax since they make no profits or revenues?
The electrical wiring in the walls produces electro-magnetic radiation.Oh, the same people who worry over WiFi already have that covered. Just google "dirty electricity".
which demanded the paper ?stop this article immediately, because I will sue you just like I sue the people who don?t pay their dues.? he said.Has he forgotten that the HOA has contracts with the people who don't pay their dues, and that's why he can sue them?
Shouldn't the judge ask for a copy of Anthony Saltmarsh's signature, for comparison? Or would that be beyond the scope of the judge's powers?