Of course you must have missed the part where most of those advancements have been in the realm of computer technology, which have had little to no patent protection until very recently.
We are optimistic that Google's actions will help steer consumers to the myriad legitimate ways for them to access movies and TV shows online, and away from the rogue cyberlockers, peer-to-peer sites, and other outlaw enterprises that steal the hard work of creators across the globe.This is their problem right here. They already think that there are "myriad legitimate ways for them to access movies and TV shows online". There isn't. You can't just go to Hulu or Netflix and watch any movie or TV show you want when you want, they don't have them all, or they are region restricted or windowed. Until this happens the "rogue cyberlockers, peer-to-peer sites, and other outlaw enterprises" will always provide the better service.
Unless they can plaster their artist at the top of the chainThis, plus they want the largest share of any revenue regardless of where their artists are at in the chain.
Your arguments might be a little more reasonable sounding if you'd quit throwing around that "100% gross margin" line. It shows that you didn't actually read the linked article, nor have a clue what you're talking about. All that shipping, storing, processing, and re-shiping of the used games they buy is paid for out of Gamestop's "100% gross margin", but with new games all those costs are paid for by the distributer and are included in the wholesale price of the product, this usually includes the return shipping for unsold/damaged product. And you have to subtract all the used games they sell at a loss--or can't sell at all--plus any defective merchandise, so I wonder how much difference in profit there is for Gamestop between a new game and the same game used (it's probably not near as much as all the haters want to believe it is).
Same here. Thought it was on my end too.
This is the problem that Linux has with adoption at this point--user's first impressions of it. Yes, Linux had all these problems when most Windows users were first exposed to it. Many, if not most of these issues have been fixed in most distros at this point.
Windows Vista was not shit, it just changed so many things that almost no software or hardware made for previous versions of Windows would work with it (of course added with the whole Vista Ready, Vista Capable debacle). Windows 7 is for the most part just a slightly tweaked Vista with a few years of third party support, so almost everything will run on it out of the box. Window XP had the exact same problems for people coming from Windows 9X. It took years for everything to be compatible with it.
Yeah, But at least the US government has the excuse of huge brib...er...campaign contributions, and the promise of lucrative employment once retired. What's in it for all these other governments?
But it's only anonymous to us, the end viewer. YouTube knows exactly who that upload came from, well at least as far as an ip address can be used to identify a single person. If the IP holder wishes to sue the uploader, they can get a court order to have YouTube reveal that information to them.
This. And they also expect Google to somehow know the difference. How? By using magic I guess.
True. Apple has never been innovative. Very good at taking the designs of others and making them allegedly better? Very good at that, but that's not innovation.
How about this as evidence of prior art? Front surfaces flat with rounded corners? Check. Rectangular display screen centered on the front flat surface? Double check. Overall shape rectangular with four flat sides and four rounded corners? Quadruple check. and lets see...the front surface is flat and the profile is thin. Not much left to that patent except the clear front surface. but I really don't think you can patent the physical properties of glass.
In my study I have found that bad decisions by politions cost taxpayers 1 million$ a day for each taxpayer.
Fixed that for ya ;)
I say, good, let the professional writing industry die. In any other consumer facing industry, if you tried to say that the only way for you to survive as an industry is to continue to not give your customers what they want, you would be laughed out of business. I can't understand how these allegedly smart and savvy business people can believe that giving the customer what they want is a bad idea.
Dirty cheap / free is the easiest sale in the world, and that's why sellers with no imagination go there.Oh really? Amazon and Steam would disagree with that--In fact they do--they actually recommend "Dirty cheap" as the best price to maximize profitability. And I would say that those are two of the businesses in the digital area with some of the most imagination.
That was probably intentional--much easier to defend your point of view if the opposition looks like it's a minority fringe.
In the end, it will be neither the old guard (the publishing houses, agents, and authors who support them), or the upstarts (self publishing authors) who will decide what shape the publishing industry will take--the consumers will vote with their money on what model of publishing will work (and it will be something completely different than what exists now).
Yup, Almost all of the authors whose books I am willing to pay full price for, were discovered through cheap (used bookstores) or free (public library) books. And honestly, I don't think piracy losses can possibly amount to more than was lost to the authors and publishers through those two--seeing as you can't sell an e-book, and good luck finding many at your library (although it is getting better).
Curse you, Perry the Platypus!!!
It's almost amusing how mystified record label execs seem to be over the most basic product marketing processes. With all these people they allegedly employ, you would think they would want to hire some with some product research/marketing skills. Even the most basic knowledge would suffice. What do our prospective customers want? How do they consume it? What other ways would they like to consume it? What are they willing to pay for it? How can we sell it to them at that price and still make enough profit to support growing our market?
Nope, nor do they have to deal with all the other great anti-piracy features like CD-Keys or on-line checks and the wonderfully buggy SecuROM that all the legitimate customers have such a fun time dealing with.
Re: Re: Re: