Living in a country where federal investigators can lie to you freely during interrogations/questionings, but will charge you with a felony if you dare lie to them in answer to their questions. Land of the free*. *Free only applies to individuals and entities who are in power or have enough money/political influence. Not you.
I mean, any lawyer worth half a damn could parlay that 10 minutes of research into at least a couple of billable hours. Admittedly, that would probably be fewer hours than they could bill for sending out the C&D. So yeah. Greed?
Perhaps the officer should be ticketed for disturbing the peace along with being fired for violating departmental policy.
Now, now. It's a desert, so water is way more expensive.
"But this is mixing apples and orangutans"
I genuinely scared my dog when I read this because it made me laugh way too loudly. I'm keeping this for use in the future.
To get past that point, we'd have to restructure elections so that the "first past the post" method we currently use got changed to something else. Unfortunately, both parties currently in power have no plans to weaken their positions by allowing anyone else to step into the pool. We need a complete overhaul of our entire electoral process, including but not limited to ranked-choice voting and the elimination of gerrymandering in favor of an independent districting committee that is not beholden to either party. I don't see that happening any time soon. Probably not in my lifetime.
"To simplify adoption, Matter will start as an application layer on top of existing IP technologies, including ethernet, Wi-Fi, Thread, and Bluetooth (for device provisioning)."
I hope they're starting from a strong security focus. I mean, I know they aren't because security is hard, and hard things cost money, but still.
I think you misread that. I believe OP was saying $50 total for 4 services, so $12.50 per service per month on average.
I want to vote this as funny, but some idiot city councilman just read this and was all "Yes! Yes! That's exactly what we should do!"
In the 90s, fashion magazines aimed at teens were to blame for depression/poor self-image. Oh, and also grunge music. Everyone seems to forget how much growing up sucks, and how scary the teen years are by the time they have teens of their own. Easier to blame the new hotness than try to understand what your kid is going through, I guess.
Oh come on. A part of the US government targeting citizens? I can think of No Such Agency.
I can't decide if this is a perfect example of Hanlon's Razor, or if it's actual evil. Given that a corporate mouthpiece is spouting this insanity, it really could go either way.
Licensing audits in the business world are very common. Microsoft, Adobe, VMware, Kaseya and a whole host of others that I've worked with over the years have these provisions. Usually it boils down to them having the company run a tool that checks for installed instances of the software on corporate networks, and compares that to the number of seats the company has licensed for use. If the company is out of compliance, they work with them to purchase enough licenses to cover their level of utilization. Sometimes companies even get a price break on true-up. The "without limitation" part of this particular license agreement is definitely a little concerning, but the practice of license auditing is an every day part of the business software world.
It's funny how many companies and government organizations trot out the "the security of the data we collect is of the utmost importance" line AFTER an easily preventable breach or (as in the case here) blatant information security malpractice. If the security of users were truly important to them, it wouldn't be an afterthought, and they wouldn't be attacking the white hats who properly disclose vulnerabilities in a responsible manner.
Is this stage two or stage three of Doctorow's Shitty Technology Adoption Curve?
Is it too late to get Tom Wheeler back? He was the first halfway decent FCC chair in my memory.
Because corporations don't want to make some of the money. They want to make all of the money.
I'm at a loss for even attempting to wrap my head around the idiocy of these bills. Instead, I'll just politely point out the typo in the headline. :)
I see Cory Doctorow's Shitty Technology Adoption Curve is back with a vengeance.
Someone is missing from this comment thread
I can't put my finger on who it is, but I know there's someone who insists that all moderation on social media is evil censorship and shouldn't happen. Since I can't think of his name, I'll just use a totally made up one. I'll call him Koby. Anyone seen him? Or did he trip over his blankie in his rush to decry this horrible example of "censorship" and knock himself unconscious?