There's an important point hidden in their expenses. The whole 'producer' concept is the key to understanding the label mindset.
Musicians make music. Producers make product, which is how the Labels view their wares. Once the promotions department is finished with it, it's a tightly controlled packaging of the artist's intention, using the closed feedback loop of chart numbers as an infinitely recursive mass focus group.
They still think in terms of physical objects: their entire philosophy, and their entire workflow is based around solid lumps of plastic and the vending thereof.
They don't know how to change, because all they know is 'product'. 'Product' isn't what's selling.
Between these headlong leaps to extremes, and your new found affection for 'reasonable assumptions', you're really losing your edge. Been a long week, has it?
C'mon... you're not even trying here. I know it's the end of the week, but put some damned effort into it, wouldja?
This is Techdirt...Politico is two doors down, on the right.
In the beginning, Apple was the one with the plastic velcro on their cases for easy access to the card slots. PC's were the ones that voided your warranty if the anti-tamper strips showed *any* signs of human contact.
Apple was most emphatically *not* always locked down.
You are paying them for their skillset... the music is how their use of their skillset manifests itself.
In the case of a (for want of a better term) celebrity musician, wouldn't the product being sold be Reznor (and his not unsubstantial skillset) himself?
We look forward to Hollywood leading the way to this new era of completely original creativity. They'll be getting right on that as soon as they're finished promoting 'Battleship: The Movie' and can free up some manpower, I presume?
I think PaulT has covered most of your less factual assumptions quite splendidly below.
You state opinions as fact. It really undermines your attempts at logic.
It's worth noting that the cake is the middleman between the film maker and the audience; it will be claiming all ensuing revenue until the costs of batter, icing and oven time are fully recouped.
The amount of effort you put into being willfully obtuse for the sole purpose of steering the dialog towards whatever point you're attempting to make is truly impressive.
In the early '70's Fahrenheit 451, 1984 and Brave New World were on my required reading list in grade 10.
Cautionary tales, doncha know.
Unfortunately, many of my generation assumed they were instruction manuals.
You're seriously putting forth the theory that it's wrong to assume the DMCA is *somehow* involved in a DMCA takedown?
I'm from Vancouver...I know the drug trade.
You'd think these guys would try to come up with an original scam, instead of doing a mashup of other PRO's clearly copyrighted techniques.
No one will want to do a $100 million dollar scam anymore if filthy pirates are just going to rip off their methods for their own gain.
Sheesh.