They believe they are providing Google with content and Google is profiting off their content. Google isn't sharing the money with them, and they feel entitled to it. Simple as that.
News in the United States has been divided into the "mainstream media" and everything else (i.e. sources not controlled by Newscorp).
Anyone that relies on mainstream media for news deserves their ignorance.
Grammar Nazis are the worse form of troll.
On top of that... how is this a creative work in any way?
Nope. That would still be considered synced to video since it's broadcast through the television medium.
Permission no, but money yes. They could have approached these companies to pay for the entire campaign.
the only thing surprising here is that one of the studios actually lost money one of those years.
They have a right to complain, and they have a right to take legal action. That's what copyright is.
For starters, it's rarely the artists making these negotiations. It's one big corporate music label negotiating with a big corporate television network. Each is trying to get the best deal from the other one, which includes limiting use of the music as much as possible by only allowing it for broadcast but not for sale (which up through the 80s was almost unheard of for TV shows, largely because there was no efficient means to package that much material).
In other words, it's all about how middle men divide up culture into as many little pieces as possible so they can sell it off a piece at a time. You would think the right to use a song in a TV show would extend to all uses of that TV show into the future, but sadly those are different pieces with different price tags.
And the big corporations like it this way because it keeps little people out of their business and gives them an excuse to hire lots of lawyers and middle men.
It wasn't a big deal when the big corporations controlled the means of distribution, but now the internet lets anybody distribute music and video, and that's why copyright is such an issue for them. They can't do anything without the proper contracts being signed, but the little people are going around publishing material left and right.
For a long time it was WKRP and Wonder Years, but it seems those issues have been resolved. I'm sure there are many others.
Anyone that records a video of someone playing a song or puts a song in their video needs a sync license unless they can make a case for fair use, which can only be determined in a court of law.
That's why Youtube is becoming a graveyard of taken down videos.
This could only work if EVERY business did it and did it at the same time. Otherwise the government would hit each individual business hard (and go after the individuals running that business). Only a collective and very public action against government intrusion would be effective.
And don't forget that up until the 2000s, big business was routinely painted as evil. Nobody would trust them when they complained about what the government was doing. Now suddenly Yahoo has turned all Kim Dotcom and become heroes thanks to the government's malevolence.
"Play it and see what happens."
Most likely nothing after that exchange, but unfortunately few people have Letterman's bankroll to so brazenly break the law.
And really, Dave, "Life in the Fast Lane" is your song, isn't it?
Apparently convicted felons should never be given a job where they interact with another human being.
From what I've seen of the film, no it wouldn't.
That's because building the box is the purpose of these organizations.
It's a simple numbers game. Once the spreadsheet shows that sports can make more money offering their own subscriptions rather than offering subscriptions through cable, they'll ditch cable in a millisecond.
I think the biggest impediment to all this has been getting streaming and online content onto people's big screens instead of their computer screen, and they're finally making that happen.
By your logic, torrenting isn't free either because you have to have pay for a computer and an internet connection and it requires bandwith, and you have to give your attention to ads on the torrent sites.
But yeah, let's keep redefining what you mean by free until it only fits the narrow logic you need to make your pointless point that Mike endorses piracy.
People who say remixing isn't an art are insulting an awful lot of professional sound engineers and sound designers.