Less relevant every day? They own half of pop culture.
I'm glad people want to come here. It means we're a better place than wherever they're coming from. It's when people start to leave that I'll get worried.
If the law is detrimental to society, the economy, and humanity, then I'd say change the law. Keeping illegals here and making them legal will be better for the U.S. in the long run.
You could change the system so they're no longer criminals.
Opinion blogs should have comments. The open form is the one thing that makes Techdirt worthwhile.
Techdirt only reports on ICE because it's a long-evolved extension of its technology reporting. Why should it report on apartheid in Israel? Is it a high-tech wall?
I agree, esp. when guys like David Boies also do things like overturning California's Proposition 8 and helping Lawrence Lessig challenge the Electoral College.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drpgiUP6Yrc
He takes on high profile cases. He just may not be on your side. That's what lawyers do.
We've always charged people for their thoughts.
Wait until other countries start seizing the assets of Americans.
This is one case where it seems lots of people just assume he's guilty as sin and don't really care what happens to him as long as he's thoroughly punished.
But that's different than a streaming service, where you can pick and choose which episodes or content you want to watch. I'd rather pay for access to a massive library than have one programmed for me on cable.
While it's not as simple as that and such a law would never be passed, it would solve a lot of problems with copyright.
I would put a time limit on it though, to say if a work wasn't made available for a certain number of years. There are valid reasons not to make something available temporarily, but it should not be out of print indefinitely. And an exception would be works with pending legal issues.
Of course, it raises a can of worms about what constitutes "making available" and "reasonable price."
If the CBS streaming service offered everything CBS owns since it started broadcasting, that might be worthwhile.
The way to make these services appealing is to offer deep libraries. That why Netflix made money with the DVD service.
If you truly have respect for the legal system and laws, then you can respect that she has served her time in prison and is therefore vindicated of any crimes.
I'm in Kansas City, and even today we still have a couple of video rental stores operating. Blockbuster never killed them all off, nor did Netflix. Maybe my city is an anomaly?
Blockbuster was rarely the only game in town. There were always many competing video rental stores. Blockbuster was just the national chain - the only one capable of competing with Netflix for streaming, but it was too protective of its rental business to change direction.
And here I thought the purpose of serving prison time was to act as punishment for their crimes, but I guess some people can't accept that and want criminals to be punished for the rest of their lives. Funny how those are the same people that put all their faith in the justice system.
Funny how the music industry won't release an mp3 of a song for free, but are happy to offer a music video with the mp3 embedded for free.
Funny how the music video itself has no value, but the audio inside it is precious.
What is it that makes the video worth giving away but not the music?
Frankly, I've ripped songs from youtube vids before, but usually just for music I can't buy otherwise. If they won't offer it for sale, why not give it away for free?
Re: Re: Re:
No, I mean the stuff most people pay attention to.