My bad =) i looked at the profile picture and assumed female.
Hey, at least you got a reply =)
I'm still waiting for him trying to justify twisting the terminology to suit his needs.
But yes, i agree that he is a bit like Darryl, he wont reply to any of the hard questions.
... i guess the hat fits =)
If it diverts an income stream from a rights holder it is theft.
I think you'll find that if you look up the legal definition of theft, and then the legal definition of copyright infringement you'll notice a few things.
Like ... they're two different things.
- "Hang on" you say
- "Calling things by their proper names ? surely this must be witchcraft!" you say
As it turns out ... no, it is not.
It's the intellectually honest thing to do, to actually use the right terms.
You don't point at the saltshaker and ask yer wife to pass you the hammer do you ?
More to the point though, Vivaelamor never said copyright infringement was not a crime, she merely pointed out that that crime is not THEFT, and mixing up the terminology is just plain bad.
I'm starting to think that someone went cheap when they outsourced their astroturfing ...
Those are the best kind of trolls imo =), when they can't even be arsed to read your reply and respond to it people tend to dismiss anything they say after that.
But aye, maybe Mike should create a new usercategory named "Trollslayer" =)
Hang in there sister, we must be strong and fight stupidity wherever it creeps out.
Tbh DH ...
This is awesome, i mean Darryl is obviously a few fries short of a happymeal.
If he's the one chosen to argument for 'the other side' here ... it's gunna be a very very short argument once someone explains to him (real slow like and none of dem scary big words) that he lost the argument.
Just think how many people are now out on the streets that would otherwise have been passive news consumers in their own homes.
Sure, by cutting communications they might have made it a tiny bit harder for the really motivated people to organize big protests, but as it is now they have people on the streets that would never have gone if they could get news and reports in the safety of their own homes.
My bet is that they're just trying to build a solid legal precedence by going after the dead / disused sites.
The name of the ISP is "Bahnhof" not Banhof.
( http://www.bahnhof.se/ )
"That is what the data retention law is about, THEY HAVE TO RETAIN THAT DATA, in plain text, human readable form,
So if you have an account with that ISP, that ISP will have to provide the IP you used at the time, your Name and your Address.
No VPN is going to stop that from occuring."
You seem like you don't fully grasp how a VPN works, think of it as surfing via a proxy server, all the logs from the ISP will show you connected to the VPN - not the target webpage/service/ftp/newsserver/tracker/whatever.
So in plaintext, the ISP will hand over the logs, but the logs will be useless since they will only show you connected to the VPN.
And before you even start, a VPN is a service, not an ISP, so the law does not apply to a VPN.
The logs would not be encrypted to start with, but all the traffic IN the logs would be to the VPN instead of the destination website.
They can fully comply with the law and hand over the useless logs.
So yes, That will work.
uuuhhm, imma have to call you on "Banhof are VERY small, operated out of what could be anyone's basement."
They have serverfarms in several cities, the one in Stockholm is housed in a cold war era nuclear bunker(http://www.bahnhof.net/).
We should all be grateful Mike, this is a user who has taken it upon himself to provide us with cheap laughs.
Granted the humor might be unintentional, but a laugh is a laugh.
In my personal experience Ernie Ball wont last as long, but in Ernie Balls defense though i have to admit that there has been a fair amount of guitarplaying at parties so i might not have been entirely sober when most of those strings broke =).
My guitar now sports Ernie Ball and the D'addario set is in the trash. =(
As much as i like their product, they will no longer have my support.
To the point where i will knowingly use an inferior product.
"The web allows people to steal their product with little to no repercussions, of course there gonna fight back."
Dear Sir. Kindly explain to me HOW THE FUCK a pair of Nikes get stolen over the web.
That is all.
What you missed here mike is that they're bringing up the debate on the SWIFT agreement again, this - valid or not - is bringing up the sharing of banking data with the US.
Potentially this could wreck a lot of information sharing between the EU and the US.
Most countries see it as an act of war when you kidnap and torture their citizens.
So uuh ... srsly, what the hell are we complaining about really ? due to OUR actions they can justify a war against us, yet we blame THEM.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Let's play set theory
Mmmm ... and give Democracy back to the people by outlawing political lobbying, your vote should be yours, not yours until some big corporation 'buys' whoever you voted for.