And the same can be said about the pre-camera statistics. Where there things going on at those intersections which increased the risk of accident. Like rain, or construction, or people standing in the middle of the street dressed like a troll. If there was an elevation prior to the installation, then that would only further prove the growing trend that camera cause additional accidents.
I suspect there is an equal level of probability that the risks were elevate above normal levels due to external events prior to the camera installation as there was after the installation.
Your problem is your provider over-sold the connection and NN people are all using their connection. Not 1 person taking up all of the bandwidth.
The only way 1 or the top 5% of the users could cause congestion for everyone is if A) They oversold the last mile or B) They have a HUGE bottle neck at one of their POPs.
Either way, caps don't fix it. More equipment fixes it.
Do I know you? Cause you sure has hell proclaim to know me.
Do you honestly believe that the MPAA/RIAA wouldn't be pushing for stronger copyright laws and enforcement if there was no theft? If so, you haven't paid attention to their past. Many if not most copyright extensions have been at the bequest of those two parties. They have lobbied for increasing the scope and penalties of copyright since the record player.
I suspect the only way they will ever come close to be satisfied is if every performance of a song/movie/whatever was paid for each time, at a rate that meets their profit needs, and without having to pay the artists involved in its creation.
I suspect at this point, they will never let up off suing people due to the huge amount of profit they make from the settlement letters. Lawyers for companies of that size are on retainer and litigation essentially becomes a fixed cost.
While I can appreciate, to an extent, the technicality of her maybe having brken a law, that in no way justifies the law, the prosecution, the MPAA/RIAA's behavior, or the destruction of this girls life.
Ending a persons life with intent = 5-6 years.
Filming 3-4 minutes of a movie without intent = up to 3 years.
The only lesson she is going to learn is how to live on the streets and what discrimination is. 3-4 minutes of video for a life of bullshit. Dificulty getting a job (even worse in a recession), restrictions on her freedoms, limitations to her rights as a citizen, etc., etc.
How the fuck do you justify that? What harm did she do to ANYONE to deserve her life to be a tossed on for the next decade or more?
Belief - Holding something to be true with out evidence.
Knowledge - Holding something to be true with (or because of) evidence.
Watch the show, learn something, and you will see he mocks the Dems when they are dumb asses as well. It just turns out that the current neo-con circus is doing a lot better at making themselves a target.
Ya. I use Google products solely because of their IP. It has nothing to do with their reputation or the quality of product they put out. Simply because they own their search algorithm. Nothing more.
(In the event the tone of this comment is question, I will clarify and say that it is most definitely SARCASM.)
> The road to being able to take the content you legally buy everywhere with you is to give up some of your "free speech" control over your stuff. You have to give a little in order to get a lot.
This is typically a place for civility and intellectualism, but this comment all I have to say is "fuck you".
I am not giving up a damn thing for any conglomerate organization and for you to think it is OK tells me that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Wow.. go from a group being critical of an organization that has historically supported business interest over the consumer to some political conspiracy.
And really what does radio play matter? Since when did the vast majority of songs on the radio get chosen by the listeners? I have always seen it more as an advertising platform for the music than a way for me the consumer to show my interests.
Re:
Cause it would be 30 to 40 minutes tops before it did work on a PC. Completely ignoring the hurdle to adoption and everything else.
Re: Forget secret votes
Votes used to be public. They were made secret because political parties were bullying people for not voting according to their plans.
Fucking public interest!?! How does it work?
Re: What does Rocco want?
OMG!! Children.. think of them.. errr..
Moral Outrage is what sells.
Re:
Please Don't Feed The Trolls.
Moron in a hurry
I don't know, he may have a case. It could be pretty difficult to distinguish a celebrity chef from a 70s band.
Re: Hard to seperate out data
I can play this game too!!
And the same can be said about the pre-camera statistics. Where there things going on at those intersections which increased the risk of accident. Like rain, or construction, or people standing in the middle of the street dressed like a troll. If there was an elevation prior to the installation, then that would only further prove the growing trend that camera cause additional accidents.
I suspect there is an equal level of probability that the risks were elevate above normal levels due to external events prior to the camera installation as there was after the installation.
Re:
Your problem is your provider over-sold the connection and NN people are all using their connection. Not 1 person taking up all of the bandwidth.
The only way 1 or the top 5% of the users could cause congestion for everyone is if A) They oversold the last mile or B) They have a HUGE bottle neck at one of their POPs.
Either way, caps don't fix it. More equipment fixes it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Think in a broader context.
>says a member of the entitlement society.
Do I know you? Cause you sure has hell proclaim to know me.
Do you honestly believe that the MPAA/RIAA wouldn't be pushing for stronger copyright laws and enforcement if there was no theft? If so, you haven't paid attention to their past. Many if not most copyright extensions have been at the bequest of those two parties. They have lobbied for increasing the scope and penalties of copyright since the record player.
I suspect the only way they will ever come close to be satisfied is if every performance of a song/movie/whatever was paid for each time, at a rate that meets their profit needs, and without having to pay the artists involved in its creation.
I suspect at this point, they will never let up off suing people due to the huge amount of profit they make from the settlement letters. Lawyers for companies of that size are on retainer and litigation essentially becomes a fixed cost.
While I can appreciate, to an extent, the technicality of her maybe having brken a law, that in no way justifies the law, the prosecution, the MPAA/RIAA's behavior, or the destruction of this girls life.
Re: Valubale lesson
Ending a persons life with intent = 5-6 years.
Filming 3-4 minutes of a movie without intent = up to 3 years.
The only lesson she is going to learn is how to live on the streets and what discrimination is. 3-4 minutes of video for a life of bullshit. Dificulty getting a job (even worse in a recession), restrictions on her freedoms, limitations to her rights as a citizen, etc., etc.
How the fuck do you justify that? What harm did she do to ANYONE to deserve her life to be a tossed on for the next decade or more?
Re: Re: Re: Think in a broader context.
>are a result of people pirating and stealing content on a large scale.
I disagree. They are a result of greed and ignorance on the part of the RIAA/MPAA/etc.
Re:
ya. That's the ticket. Cause offering a product through different means is exactly like copying someone else's work.
If you can't make the distinction between the two, you have lost at the internets.
AP Hypocracy
Hypocracy: The AP is upset because an organization is placing restrictions on their content.
Re:
Belief - Holding something to be true with out evidence.
Knowledge - Holding something to be true with (or because of) evidence.
Watch the show, learn something, and you will see he mocks the Dems when they are dumb asses as well. It just turns out that the current neo-con circus is doing a lot better at making themselves a target.
Re:
Ya. I use Google products solely because of their IP. It has nothing to do with their reputation or the quality of product they put out. Simply because they own their search algorithm. Nothing more.
(In the event the tone of this comment is question, I will clarify and say that it is most definitely SARCASM.)
Re:
> The road to being able to take the content you legally buy everywhere with you is to give up some of your "free speech" control over your stuff. You have to give a little in order to get a lot.
This is typically a place for civility and intellectualism, but this comment all I have to say is "fuck you".
I am not giving up a damn thing for any conglomerate organization and for you to think it is OK tells me that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Re:
>why can't you make a mug that says: "I love twilight"
Where is the money in that?
Grab your tinfoil hats!!!
Wow.. go from a group being critical of an organization that has historically supported business interest over the consumer to some political conspiracy.
Re: In some cases ...
And that is even a different scenario than this. That is the same reason you can't yell "fire" in a theater.
Re: Billboard Charts
And really what does radio play matter? Since when did the vast majority of songs on the radio get chosen by the listeners? I have always seen it more as an advertising platform for the music than a way for me the consumer to show my interests.