I've never read or heard anywhere anyone proposing we round up homosexuals and throw them into death camps. There might be a few fringe kooks who say that, but I find it hard to believe that Milo Yannapolis (sp?) would advocate for death camps he personally would be subject to.
Please try to refrain from using foul language in your headlines. I really like this site and the stories posted, but I have a hard time sending links to NSFW content.
Meanwhile, the uninvited and their supporters are shouting about censorship in a way that suggests their views must be tolerated without reaction, which is a complete misunderstanding of how free speech works.
If by "tolerated," you mean "given," I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the controversy here. After years of having the Democrats saying, "If you don't like what I have to say, don't listen," (or watch, particularly when it comes to the TV shows they've put out over the last few decades) now it's "If I don't like what you have to say I don't want to listen, and I don't want anyone else to, either."
If someone is giving a speech at a college or university, and I, as a student, don't like what that particular speaker has to say, I stay away from the speech. I do not try to stop other people from going, though.
Why not have twenty to thirty people print out some Supreme Court decisions, put them in a binder and label it "Correspondence with Attorney" and after they read through it, sue them for violating Attorney-Client privilege?
We need to be proäctive, people!
Right hand, take a look at what the left hand is doing...
I wonder if Trump will produce his own document where he officially classified anything Comey had written about him or his administration.
Doesn't the president have that power and wouldn't that make Comey a "leaker?"
Is it really permanent? Aren't new Congresses not bound by previous Congresses' actions?
Couldn't a new majority in Congress just pass a new law that invalidates the whole thing?
As a highschooler in the 1980s (1980-1984) I have experience in the Apple II DRM BS. There were many companies who implemented DRM in their games and we spent many hours calling various BBSs to find the "cracked" versions so we could have a backup if our 5.25" disks bit the dust (which happened with frequent regularity). It was cheaper, even with a dialup service in a different state, to download it DRM-free.
But there was one company, here in San Diego, who proudly stated their software was DRM-free, Beagle Bros., and everyone I knew bought their software in the stores for two main reasons:
1. They had great software with great manuals.
2. They didn't hate their customers by implementing DRM.
Learn from history, software companies, it can save you a lot of headaches (if you'll listen!).
Why not, when a government agency refuses to respond to a legitimate FOIA request, just make it so the courts have to believe the very worst of the agency, and act accordingly?
For example, if you won't divulge the information about Geek Squad members and payments from the FBI, courts will assume all cases related to Geek Squad discoveries are illegal searches and all of them are thrown out with prejudice.
Looks like it might be time to rent a jet:
http://www.pentastaraviation.com/available-aircraft
I know the writers here at Techdirt, and other places, think it's okay to defame politicians, since they are public figures and whatever anyone says about them is allowed. I'm wondering what the limit is, though.
How would you define it? I know in this story the politician was angry that he and his colleagues were characterized as receiving kickbacks, an as-yet unproven charge (as far as I know). Is claiming a politician committed a specific crime okay, even if there is no evidence beyond speculation?
As soon as I heard that Huma Abedin forwarded classified emails to her then-husband to print out on their home printer, and Comey testifies to Congress that the law says there must be intent to prosecute (the law says nothing about intent), I was expecting him to get fired.
Before the ACA, Americans would be denied insurance coverage for cancer treatment merely for not reporting teenage acne when they applied for insurance.I've been trying to find a reputable source for a story about this, but I can only find far-left websites making this claim. Do you have a link to a website that isn't directly linked to the Democrats that has this story?
Is it just me or are there suddenly a slew of Zillow defenders that just decided today is the day they'd come on over to Techdirt and have their say?
Funny how that works!
TSA: Tolerated Sexual Assault?
I read the opening of the second paragraph as "Quack recap:"
I looked for the "done nothing but deal dope their whole lives" quote, supposedly by Jeff Sessions, but google only lists this story as a source.
Where did you get this quote from?
So the NSA can build a data center with hundreds of petabytes of storage to hold all our calls, texts, and emails, but a few hundred terabytes to hold court records is beyond the pale?
Now the app community has a new task: create a lock screen, that if you place a specific finger on the screen to unlock it, the phone is wiped instead of unlocked.
1. Create app to wipe phone if compromised
2. ???
3. Profit!
Hmmm...
I guess two Wangs do make this right!