" They didn't even have to because they weren't even based in the U.S."
Even inside the US, there is no legal requirement to comply with DMCA takedown notices. Companies do it because they get additional legal protections if they do, but it is not required.
I don't know the MAC addresses of my wireless devices, because they are all randomized and change with every connection.
I track which is which through certs.
There is no need to have a special device to do this. Anybody with a smartphone (at least an Android one, but I assume iPhones as well) can start sniffing MAC addresses in a matter of minutes.
The only "value add" the cop could be providing is to run a database of such addresses, but considering that MAC addresses are not guaranteed to be unique and are easily changeable by the user, the value of such a database is very low.
Maybe it's different in Texas, but where I live the people who run the police departments are elected officials.
It's also insulting and not really true (unless you consider "people" somme sort of monolithic entity, but at that point you're talking about something fictional). I actively work to make government less awful and I vote accordingly. In what sense do I "deserve" the government I have?
Yes. I'm half a continent away from Texas, but when my daughter was in middle school, they put the entire school on lockdown once because a kid got his head stuck in a fence.
I only wish I were joking.
A hoax bomb is indeed a thing. So are hoax guns. The differentiator is what they are being represented as being, not what they look like. If you bundle up a few dowels and tell everyone it's a bomb, you've made a "hoax bomb". Legally, hoax weapon perpetrators can be punished as if they were the real thing.
The flip side is that if you made a device that looks like a real bomb and tell everyone it's not a real bomb, then you haven't made a "hoax bomb".
This student made something that didn't look like a bomb, and that he wasn't claiming was a bomb, and so what he made was obviously not a hoax bomb.
I disagree. If he had done that, he would be perpetuating a large part of the harm of these idiotic policies.
Do you really believe that people who choose to remain anonymous are behaving like petty criminals, "Whatever"?
Ahem.
The ad appears to be entirely fair use to me. If so, then it doesn't matter who owns the copyright. The copyright assignment wouldn't enter into it.
The 2nd amendment does not do that. It only preserves the right to own firearms, not the right to use them for that particular purpose.
There is a very real threat involved: arrest or worse.
This is so, but most people don't want money. They want to be able to meet their life needs. Money is just a tool to do that.
That this is an important point is demonstrated by the fact that having too much money makes you just as unhappy as having too little. The sweet spot is to have just a bit more than is necessary to pay for your necessities.
Their response to this parody (which is hilarious) is ironclad proof that the parody hit the nail right on the head.
"Windows 10 for desktops managed not to suck outside the security and privacy issues"
If we ignore the security issues, then "sucks" may be too harsh a term for Windows 10. However, I do think it's fair to say that on the whole Windows 10 is inferior to Windows 7.
"You can stream Netflix using the Google Chrome browser -- even on Linux."
So they claim. I have not found this to be acutally true.
"It just needs a browser on a computer."
It needs more than that. You also need to be running a supported operating system. I still cannot watch Netflix on Linux machines without doing an awful lot of hacking.
meaning that Netflix made a judgement call and decided this content was content that its customers can live without.
Re: Chill out people, nobody threatened anybody
If what you say is true, that makes Burning Man's statements even worse, as they are threatening legal action that they have no intention of taking.