Well, Trump has said that he WILL sue all those women... after he wins the election. That goes hand-in-hand with his promise to change defamation/libel/slander laws so that truth is no longer a defense. Then he'll feel perfectly safe suing women he has assaulted.
I've bought a game in a genre I don't normally care for just to support the developers before. Probably do it again as well. As long as the game is good and the devs aren't assholes, I'll often spend the money even if it's not what I normally play.
Yeah, I was going to say that being a rental car and not being able to roll the window down because of hidden drug stashes are kinda mutually incompatible... unless the rental agency specializes in cars for smugglers. :)
The debate sold me - I'm DEFINITELY voting third party, no matter what. Both major candidates aren't worth pissing on if they were on fire. You can yammer about "lesser of two evils" all you want - they're both EQUALLY evil. No thanks. And later, when you all are complaining about whichever wins, I'll laugh and say I told you so.
Which is exactly the problem today - most laws are written by lawyers with the express intent of keeping other lawyers employed interpreting the laws they write. There hasn't been a "plain-language" law in decades. It's exactly the same problem with patents - patent lawyers write patents so that companies have to employ their own patent lawyers to tell what the flipping hell the patents mean.
There's a trial going on right now in New Mexico where two police are charged with killing a homeless man because he had a knife (well, they claim he had TWO knifes). Never mind that when they shot him, the only things in his hands was camping equipment (they were arresting him for camping on public land).
So don't try to say cops only shoot people with guns. They'll shoot you for holding ANYTHING these days.
That's NOT how the police are supposed to work. No matter what the threat, real or perceived, they are supposed to work toward a non-lethal take-down, with deescalating the threat supposedly the initial goal. Even someone who's shot a dozen people right in front of the police is SUPPOSED to be brought in alive to stand trial for their crimes. This shot first, and shot often training that cops get these days only makes the problem WORSE. Because criminals know that the cops are looking to make lethal force the first and only method, they have no reason to allow themselves to be taken without a fight. There's absolutely no incentive to surrender.
If they do manage to extradite Kim Dotcom, and then railroad him (and oooooooh boy will they ever), after he gets out many decades later, all they'll do is immediately deport him back to NZ. It all seems like a huge waste of our taxes.
Then don't hook it to the RAID controller. It's THAT SIMPLE. No computer out has ONLY a RAID controller and nothing else. Use the regular drive controller until a RAID driver is done. I don't currently use RAID, so I never even bother installing the RAID driver.
You don't need a RAID controller to do RAID in linux. I was doing RAID long before RAID controllers were even a thing. A RAID controller simply makes the RAID a little faster, and maybe a little easier... if it has a driver.