Jinxed’s Techdirt Profile

jinxed

About Jinxed




Jinxed’s Comments comment rss

  • Jun 14th, 2018 @ 9:14am

    (untitled comment)

    "With the FCC making it very clear it's a glorified rubber stamp, that leaves the DOJ as the only real wild card in terms of whether any meaningful conditions get applied to this deal."

    Not true.

    Customers can do a great deal to force a company to change its behavior.

    However, their insatiable selfish desires for the latest shiny quarter all but prevents this.

    Twas a day "boycott" actually terrified companies.

    Now, they just laugh at the word.

    Imagine, briefly, if *every single ISP customer* in the US stood up against these companies by simply not paying their bills.

    I highly doubt for a second ISPs would stand their ground.

  • May 14th, 2018 @ 10:01am

    (untitled comment)

    Perhaps Techdirt reach out to one of the authors of the bill?
    Here, I'll help:
    https://www.mpaa.org/who-we-are/#contact-us

  • May 10th, 2018 @ 5:34am

    (untitled comment)

    "If the gaming industry doesn't correct course soon, we could easily see a slowdown in an industry otherwise primed for massive growth."

    Nope. Never going to happen because gamers will not change their behavior.

    Almost every game known for having loot boxes continues to climb in sales.

    Doesn't matter if the gamer actively buys loot boxes are not, the game is selling.

    If consumers want loot boxes to go away, stop buying the damn game.

  • May 7th, 2018 @ 8:42am

    (untitled comment)

    I don't agree with the chart's assessment cord cutting is responsible for increased rates.

    I blame the distributors, who constantly force cable companies more money to charge for shows, including forcing them into "bundles" of channels owned by the same distributor.

    These "blackouts" have been just as frequent over the span of 18 years.

    Cord cutting has an impact, for sure, but when people are forced to pay $8/mo for ESPN, and this is one channel we're aware of, it makes you wonder how many other "monthly fees" we're paying for other channels.

    Cable needs shows to be viable. Without them, what's the point of cable?

    Distributors figured this out a long time ago.

    This is why cable companies started allowing ads to be injected into broadcasts.

    I'm not defending cable companies here, but to ignore the 1.2 trillion ton elephant in the room is ridiculous.

    Just as an FYI to support this: notice how many of these distributors are now pulling from places like Hulu and Netflix to push their own monthly service site.

    Eventually, distributors behind television shows will become obsolete. There won't be a platform to stream on, and those platforms whose bridges they're burning now are creating their own content, bucking the trend of old school TV.

    Can't come soon enough, frankly. Just how many CSI shows does a station need, anyway.

  • May 1st, 2018 @ 10:37am

    (untitled comment)

    There's a fundamental problem with this article and it's ignoring the obvious: even if there are 4 carriers or just 3 carriers, THERE IS NO COMPETITION IN THIS SPACE.

    There hasn't been in decades, just like the cable industry.

    Competition means competing on price, which none of these companies have ever lowered. Each has the same, identical entry price point for the same, identical features.

    Now with Zero Rating!

    No one cares about this merger. No one cars it'll cost jobs. It's between two of the smallest carriers in the US, and even after the merger, will still be the smallest carrier of Big 3.

    In addition, the article loves to believe these jobs will be "safe" without the merger, but that's a false position to make.

    Sprint has been losing customers over the past 5 years, and it hasn't done much to "expand" its business. Retail shops (or more accurately, kiosks) have been shutting down for a while now.

    These people *are* losing their jobs now. This merger won't stop this.

    A business can't compete if it doesn't have any customers. History shows this to be true as well.

    I'm not harping on the position of the article. I'm harping that it's using the same crap tactics at pushing an agenda most other "point" articles have been making of late.

  • May 1st, 2018 @ 5:06am

    (untitled comment)

    I'm a little disappointed the article didn't include the results from GEDmatch regarding Mr. DeAngelo, as they found 12% Sasquatch, 50% Anglo-saxon, 28% Pedophilia, and 10% Nordic, tracing his lineage to Elizabeth Bathory.


    Too soon?

  • Apr 30th, 2018 @ 11:16am

    (untitled comment)

    "How any of this could possibly be worth the PR hit Epic is taking is beyond me."
    No one cares about this 14 year old cheater, which is why this isn't a "PR hit".

    Today's gamers are stupid beyond words.

  • Apr 24th, 2018 @ 6:48am

    (untitled comment)

    "Right now, cable companies sell you phone, Internet service and entertainment products, all of which share one wire..."
    Exactly. One wire. Three separate bills for services which are now all digital.

    I'm sure she'll follow up with an article to boast why people love paying for HDTV "upgrades" in their cable package, never mind this is now a standard resolution.

  • Apr 23rd, 2018 @ 11:21am

    Re: Re:

    I was hoping the stretch gold would include an encrypted version, offering additional cards as "decryption devices", where points allocated from the "investigation" would determine the chance of the "BFI" to "successfully" decrypt the cards.

    The 3 device cards would be iFruit, Robotoid, and ObsoleteDevice.

    Oh, and it should include a free shredder, if we want to play an agent who wishes to cover our tracks of illegal activity when stealing Bitcoin.

  • Apr 23rd, 2018 @ 11:12am

    (untitled comment)

    100 years from now, people will be laughing at our stupidity.

  • Apr 23rd, 2018 @ 10:13am

    (untitled comment)

    "Apple sued..."

    Getting tired of seeing this is the only damn thing the company can do anymore.

  • Apr 23rd, 2018 @ 10:12am

    (untitled comment)

    Will there be a redacted version, making the challenge more difficult?

  • Apr 19th, 2018 @ 3:17am

    (untitled comment)

    If the movie industry can use child pornography and sex trafficking as excuses to pass copyright legislation, then I believe it's fair play to allow blasphemy and "pornography" to block tax incentives.

    Remember: the movie industry took the gloves off first.

  • Apr 17th, 2018 @ 11:49am

    (untitled comment)

    "There's no indication yet whether Comcast will sell Netflix at any kind of discount."
    Discount? Comcast doesn't understand the definition of the word.

    Comcast will "sell" Netflix for $49.99/mo., remove its Zero Rating protection, impose a new 100GB monthly cap, and charge customers for using Netflix, which can easily surpass 100GB monthly usage.

    Anything Comcast announces should be treated as having an ulterior motive which "discount" is not applied.

  • Apr 17th, 2018 @ 9:29am

    (untitled comment)

    I found a link to this site last year through an article talking about how horrible it was. I wanted to try it for myself.

    Putting in any movie released within a year (but older than 6 months): 0 results found

    I also put in well known older movies, such as "Die Hard": 0 results found

    Then I put in "Transmorphers", a direct-to-confused-consumer movie: 7 results found, with Netflix being #1


    The website may have been designed to help people find legal alternatives.

    Instead, it showed them few, if any, options actually existed.

    It's no wonder the MPAA took it down.

  • Apr 12th, 2018 @ 3:43am

    (untitled comment)

    Wasn't John Fithian the same person who said movie theaters wouldn't host Netflix content because it's not qualified as a movie? Something like that.

    This report from the MPAA should surprise no one, as it's the status quo from the industry:
    See new technology - sue it out of existence
    When the lawsuit fails - pass laws to limit its use
    When the laws fail - claim innovation

    How this organization, along with its sister RIAA, remain relevant fails common sense.

  • Apr 4th, 2018 @ 9:38am

    (untitled comment)

    If rational people will sit down and talk about this...

    We have, Mr. Cohen, which makes you the irrational person in these discussions.

    Perhaps learn from this.

  • Apr 2nd, 2018 @ 12:12pm

    (untitled comment)

    Another prime example of "I believe this bill is written to cover the issue while I completely ignore what the bill actually says as written."

    I'm firmly with the belief these are intentionally misdirected as to leave open "anything we didn't cover", with the "intention" only the "bad" people will get caught.

    Good representation of the buyer, and typical politician thinking who believes it's the seller that's the problem.

    It takes two to make a transaction.

  • Mar 26th, 2018 @ 11:49am

    (untitled comment)

    "Either way, the book of examples of just how incredibly the New Zealand government has fucked up everything about this case at every single turn has now added yet another chapter."

    Is MegaUpload back online? No? Then the government doesn't care.

    The outcome is precisely what they wanted, thanks to US pressure.

  • Mar 26th, 2018 @ 11:45am

    (untitled comment)

    This is great news.

    The last thing I want to see plastered all over Netflix are those fake reviews surrounded by leafy branches.

    Netflix will be just fine without Cannes.

    The opposite, in time, will not be true.

More comments from Jinxed >>