That's it! I have had enough! Just because you ** out a couple of letters doesn't make it okay to derogate people for being different.
Why don't you try calling me a NAGGER to my face!
Oh hell, yeah! The Office would do just fine without Hulu - on torrents.
I smell a commercial for replacement insurance brewing.
Grrrlllphmmmmgrrrrryaahhhwwwnn..I'm sorry, what?
Oh, TX attorneys will kick yer ass any day just as good as any other, but it damn sure helps to have a case.
Actually two of them were equally facetious, so..who's to say? But let's continue to analyze the hell out of it because, that's fun, too!
...because techdirt does not only exist for IP trolls?
I did like that.
Okay, nevermind. It's clear from some of his comments that he is super-adamant in a way that didn't come across in the article.
The salesman who can coordinate the contracting of regionalized ads to targeted audiences will have a nice revenue stream AND some nice travel opportunities.
Good point - this is a wasted opportunity for building a better business.
Yeah, it's pretty clear from the article that he was just a little offended at the multiple layers of insinuation of wrong doing when he wasn't doing something that probably shouldn't be so wrong.
Even if they had some unfortunate, unintended outcomes of their licensing control (and I respect the desire to fulfill your obligations no matter how unreasonable they are), they really should have considered how they worded the message to their viewers. "Since you're probably a thief anyway, screw you."
Good point, but if BBC doesn't find a way to capitalize on their growing international audience, they'll be depriving their UK public of some easy proceeds.
Yeah, time will tell. It's unfortunate, but understandable that Hulu had to make some concessions to get the content. It's unfortunate but understandable that their efforts to keep their obligations had unintended side effects.
If they don't fix it, that would be unfortunate and not so understandable.
Damn, that's twice now! Anyhow, custom parts are okay, and illegal mods to those customizations are not, and what Harris offered was on the legal side, bottom line.
http://tinyurl.com/yfyywmc
Begging the question is what is so fallacious. If you don't know what that means, click above.
As for parading asshats, Mr. Grand Marshal, the particular asshat in question only jacked around with technology. Somebody else did ALL the circumventing.
All of the 'illicit uses' of this hack required actual illegal hacking beyond the legal hacking that this guy did - similar to modifying custom rifle parts to make them fully auto. The custom parts -> okay. The illegal mods
"I find it hard to believe, however, that Harris did not know that A) his work could be used to break the law and B) a great many -probably most- of his clients were going to use it to do just that."
A. Not indictable, not even wrong. So could guns, rocks, and butter knives.
B. Well since his work by itself DID NOT provide the means to do so, I think you can safely be converted. BELIEVE!
BELIVE that it's legal to configure computers,
BELIEVE that it's legal to make a locked computer configurable.
OF COURSE it's not legal to spoof MACs. Whether it's legal to uncap depends on your TPM, but could also be illegal. HE DID NOT PROVIDE MACS AND HE DID NOT PROVIDE ILLEGAL CONFIGURATIONS OR HELP IN GETTING THOSE.
Please don't encourage people to believe that simply tinkering around is illegal.
No, the heart of the indictment is to use weasel words to cast a dark shadowy fog of "computer hacking" around perfectly legitimate activities just because someone else committed a crime and used Harris' tools in addition to his own illegal 'cracking' tools to commit a crime.
Distributing spoofed MAC addresses? No question that'd be the illegal part. There is a question of fact related to Harris on this, but it's a pathetically vague relation, a shady allegation, and should make for easy repudiation (unless of course he is the guy that was sniffing around for MACs and then he's pretty much toast - again doubtful).
Simply unlocking the modem? Legal activity.
Re:
Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away...