I've just assumed that this was just to give traditional media a chance to stay ahead of new media in reporting stories.
Honestly, just consider the minority of users who use ad blockers as loss leaders. Odds are, if the article is good enough, it may be shared and bring in other users that would not have normally come to the site and probably don't use an ad blocker.
Either way, there are enough news sources these days, if they want to actively encourage people not to use them as a source, somebody else will be welcoming.
Stupid truth getting in the way of a press release about stopping terrorism.
Wait. They don't want to give them the information, but if they charge them it all becomes discoverable and they would have to give it to them. Genius.
My guess: Trying not to piss off the candidates for 2016. Stay on their good side so they can minimize the contributions they need to make to get what they want.
Throughout history, there are a lot of people we look upon as villains that meant well at the time. Tread lightly.
Fortunately, it looks like some possible victims are coming forward.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-victims-denver-airport-groping-scandal-20150415-story.html
Eh, probably just make another list with another name and use it instead.
Some like powerball do. But our State drawings use computers to do the "draw".
So why are they not using a USB port blocker to lock all of the open ports? Require 2 or more people to get the key out of a safe and this would have been harder to pull off.
Govt- "Hey, we'll help you out with that whole FCC thing, if you'll do us a little favor" wink wink-nudge nudge.
Well, this is just great. They could be using this money to keep lobbying for taking away our employee benefits. Don't they know what is important?
Tomorrow's headline: US Marshals confiscate records ordered released citing unspecified threat.
I loved they said they were going to post the emails, but they needed to go through and redact them for security purposes. If nothing sent by it was classified, why is there a need to redact anything.
I bet Rogers uses a VPN to access their internal networks. Perhaps they should lead the way and stop using theirs first.
There is already a root certificate in our certificate stores listed as belonging to the US government. I'm sure there are others in there we don't know about.
Every active exploit was at one point simply theoretical. Since this is such a juicy vector, I can't imagine it will be long before it's part of the standard toolkit. If it isn't already.
I can't even get the website to let me opt out even once. I've been trying for months. Even tried today, just get the "whoops, something went wrong" error. I'm sure they are taking it seriously.
How many stories have we seen where a virus was distributed by an online ad? No thank you. It is my job as a user to minimize the vectors that malware can creep into my system. Since ad networks have proven to be a vector, it is not only my prerogative, but perhaps my duty as a responsible user, to block them.
I've no doubt Techdirt will rise to this challenge.